Trend-setters in environmental policy: The character and role of pioneer countries

European Environment

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 129-142

  Jänicke, Martin ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Convergence; Countries; Environmental policy; Pioneer

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; POLICY MAKING;

EID: 17644393452     PISSN: 09610405     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eet.375     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Andersen MS, Liefferink D. 1997. European Environmental Policy. The Pioneers. Manchester University Press: Manchester.
2. Andersson M, Mol APJ. 2002. The Netherlands in the UNFCCC process - leadership between ambition and reality. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2: 49-68.
3. Andresen S, Agrawala S. 2002. Leaders, pushers and laggards in the making of the climate regime. Global Environmental Change 12: 41-51.
4. Beise M. 2001. Lead Markets. Country Specific Success Factors of the Global Diffusion of Innovations. Physica: Heidelberg.
5. Bennett CJ. 1991. What is policy convergence and what causes it? British Journal of Political Science 21(2): 215-233.
6. Bernauer Th. 2000. Staaten im Weltmarkt: Zur Handlungsfühigkeit von Staaten trotz wirtschaftlicher Globalisierung. Leske and Budrich: Opladen.
7. Busch P-O, Jörgens H. 2005. Globale Diffusionsmuster umweltpolitischer Innovationen. Environmental Policy Research Centre: Berlin.
8. Cameron DR. 1978. The expansion of the public economy: a comparative analysis. American Political Science Review 72(4).
9. Desai U (ed.). 2002. Environmental Politics and Policy in Industrialized Countries. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
10. Drezner DW. 2001. Globalization and policy convergence. International Studies Review 3(1): 53-78.
11. Dryzek JS, Hunold Ch, Schlosberg D et al. 2002. Environmental transformation of the state: the USA, Norway, Germany and the UK. Political Studies 50: 659-682.
12. Faucheux S. 2000. Environmental policy and technological change; towards deliberative governance. In Innovation-Oriented Environmental Regulation: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Analysis, Hemmelskamp J, Rennings K, Leone F (eds). Physica: Heidelberg; 153-171.
13. Garrett G. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
14. Harvard University, World Economic Forum. 2000. The Global Competitiveness Report 2000. Oxford University Press: New York.
15. Hemmelskamp J, Rennings K, Leone F (eds). 2000. Innovation-Oriented Environmental Regulation. Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Analysis ZEW Economic Studies 10. Physica: Heidelberg.
16. Héritier A, Mingers S, Knill C, Becka M. 1994. Die Veränderung von Staatlichkeit in Europa - Ein regulativer Wettbewerb: Deutschland, Groβbritannien, Frankreich. Leske and Budrich: Opladen.
17. Jacob K. 1999. Innovationsorientierte Chemikalienpolitik. Politische, soziale und ökonomische Faktoren des verminderten Gebrauchs gefährlicher Stoffe. Herbert Utz: München.
18. Jacob K, Beise M, Blazecjzak J, Edler D, Haum RK, Jänicke M, Löw Th, Rennings K, Petschow U. 2005. Lead Markets for Environmental Innovations. ZEW: Berlin.
19. Jänicke M. 1984. Umweltpolitische Prävention als ökologische Modernisierung und Strukturwandel, IIUG Discussion Paper 84-1, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin.
20. Jänicke M. 1990. Conditions for environmental policy success: an international comparison. The Environmentalist 12(1): 47-58.
21. Jänicke M. 2000. Ecological Modernization. Innovation and Diffusion of Policy and Technology, FFU Report 00-08. Forschungsstelle für Umweltpolitik-Freie Universität Berlin: Berlin.
22. Jänicke M, Blazecjzak J et al. 2000. Environmental policy and innovation: an international comparison of policy frameworks and innovation effects. In Innovation-Oriented Environmental Regulation. Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Analysis, Hemmelskamp J, Rennings K, Leone F (eds). Physica: Heidelberg; 125-152.
23. Jänicke M, Jacob K. 2002. Ecological Modernisation and the Creation of Lead Markets, FFU Report 02-03, Freie Universität Berlin. 2004. Global Environmental Politics 4(1).
24. Jänicke M, Weidner H (eds) with Jörgens H. 1997. National Environmental Policies: a Comparative Study of Capacity-Building. Springer: Berlin.
25. Kern K, Jörgens H, Jänicke M. 2001. The Diffusion of Environmental Policy Innovations: a Contribution to the Globalisation of Environmental Policy, Discussion Paper FS II 01-302. Social Science Research Centre: Berlin.
26. Kingdon JW. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd edn. HarperCollins: New York.
27. Kitschelt H. 1983. Politik und Energie. Campus: Frankfurt/M.
28. Kok W. 2004. Facing the Challenge. The Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Employment, report from the High Level Group chaired by Wim. Kok. European Communities: Luxembourg.
29. Levi-Faur D, Jordaua J (eds). 2005. The Rise of Regulatory Capitalism: The Global Diffusion of a New Order. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. Vol. 598, March 2005.
30. Liefferink D, Andersen MS. 1996. The Innovation of EU Environmental Policy. Scandinavian University Press: Oslo.
31. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 1994. Capacity Development in Environment. OECD: Paris.
32. Porter ME, van der Linde C. 1995. Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review September-October: 120-134.
33. Rose R. 1993. Lesson-Drawing in Public Policy: a Guide to Learning Across Time and Space. Chatham House: Chatham, NJ.
34. Sabatier PA (ed.). 1999. Theories of the Policy Process. Westview: Boulder, CO.
35. Scharpf FW. 1999. Regieren in Europa. Effektiv und demokratisch? Campus: Frankfurt.
36. Schröder H. 2003. From Dusk to Dawn. Climate Change Policy in Japan, dissertation, Fachbereich Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften der Freien Universität Berlin.
37. Scruggs L. 2003. Sustaining Abundance. Environmental Performance in Industrial Democracirs. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
38. Sturm A, Wackernagel M, Müller K. 2000. The Winners and Losers in Global Competition. Why Eco-Efficiency Reinforces Competitiveness: a Study of 44 Nations. Rüegger: Chur.
39. Tews K, Busch P-O, Jörgens H. 2003. The diffusion of new environmental policy instruments. European Journal of Political Research 42(4).
40. Vogel D. 2001. Is there a race to the bottom? The impact of globalization on national regulatory policies. The Tocqueville Review/ La Revue Tocqueville 22(1).
41. Volkery A, Jacob K. 2003. Pioneers in Environmental Policy Making. Konferenzbericht, FFU Report 03-04.
42. Wallace D. 1995. Environmental Policy and Industrial Innovation. Strategies in Europe, the US and Japan. Earthscan: London.
43. Weidner H, Jänicke M (eds). 2002. Capacity Building in National Environmental Policy. A Comparative Study of 17 Countries. Springer: Berlin.
44. Wheeler D. 2001. Racing to the bottom? Foreign investment and air pollution in developing countries. Journal of Environment and Development 10(3): 225-245.
45. World Bank. 2003. World Development Report 2003. Washington, DC.
46. World Economic Forum (ed): The Global Competitiveness Report, Oxford University Press: NY.