Morphology analysis approach for technology forecasting

IEEE International Engineering Management Conference

Volumn 2, Issue , 2004, Pages 566-570

  Yoon, B C ^a   Park, Y T ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Conjoint analysis; Morphology analysis; Patent information; Technology forecasting

Indexed keywords

DATA MINING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MORPHOLOGY; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH; RISK MANAGEMENT;

CONJOINT ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY ANALYSIS (MA); PATENT INFORMATION; SUBSYSTEMS; TECHNOLOGY DOMAINS;

TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

EID: 17644388850     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. D. Zhu and A. L. Porter, "Automated extraction and visualization of information for technological intelligence and forecasting", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 69, pp. 495-506, 2002.
2. D. Barker and J. H. D. Smith, "Technology foresight using roadmaps", Long Range Planning, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 21-28, 1995.
3. J. P. Martino, "Technology forecasting - an overview", Management Science, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 28-33, 1980.
4. V. Coates, M. Farooque, R. Klavans, K. Lapid, H. A. Linstone, C. Pistorius, and A. L. Porter, "On the Future of Technological Forecasting", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 67, pp. 1-17, 2001.
5. D. L. Mann, "Better technology forecasting using systemic innovation methods", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 70, pp. 779-795, 2003.
6. J. C. Glenn and T. J. Gordon, Futures Research Methodology, Washington D.C: American Council for the UNU, 2003.
7. J. G. Wissema, "Morphological analysis: its application to a company TF investigation", Futures, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 146-153, 1976.
8. H. Majer, "Technology measurement: The functional approach", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 27, pp. 335-351, 1985.
9. J. H. Leinhard, "Some ideas about growth and quality in technology", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol.27, pp. 265-282, 1985.
10. M. Pidd, Tools for Thinking - Modeling in Management Science, London: Wiley, 1996.
11. F. Zwichy, Discovery, Invention, Research - Through the Morphological approach, Toronto: The Macmillan Company, 1969.
12. D. Cuesta-Frau, M. Aboy, J. McNames, and B. Goldstein, "Morphology analysis of intracranial pressure using pattern matching techniques", in Proc. 25th Annu. International Conf. of the IEEE EMBS, Cancun, Mexico, 2003.
13. T. Ritchey, "Using morphological analysis to evaluate preparedness for accidents involving hazardous materials", in Proc. the 4th International Conf. for Local Authorities, Shanghai, 2002.
14. M. Belaziz, A. Bouras, and J. M. Brun, "Morphological analysis for product design", Computer-Aided Design, vol. 32, pp. 377-388, 2000.
15. R. Rhyne, "Field anomaly relaxation: the arts of usage", Futures, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 657-675, 1995.
16. T. Eriksson, "Scenario development using computer aided morphological analysis", unpublished.
17. P. E. Green, A. M. Krieger, and Y. L. Wind, "Thirty years of conjoint analysis: Reflections and prospects", Interfaces, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. S56-S73, 2001.
18. V. Srinivasan and A. D. Shocker, "Estimating the weights for multiple attributes in a composite criterion using pair-wise judgments", Psychometrika, vol. 38, pp. 479-493, 1973.
19. D. R. Wittink, R. Dick, and P. Cattin, "Commercial use of conjoint analysis: An update", Journal of Marketing, vol. 53, pp. 91-96, 1989.
20. P. E. Green and V. R. Rao, "Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data", Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 8, pp. 355-363, 1971.
21. P. E. Green and V. Srinivasan, "Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice", Journal of Marketing, vol. 54, pp. 3-19, 1990.
22. R. Mulye, "An empirical comparison of three variants of the AHP and two variants of conjoint analysis", Journal of Behavioral Decision Marketing, vol. 11, pp. 263-280, 1998.
23. P. E. Green, J. D. Carroll, and S. M. Goldberg, "A general approach to product design optimization via conjoint analysis", Journal of Marketing, vol. 45, pp. 17-37, 1981.
24. P. V. Balakrishnan and V.S. Jacob, "Genetic algorithms for product design", Management Science, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1105-1117, 1996.
25. M. E. Pullman, W. L. Moore, and D. G. Wardell, "A comparison of quality function deployment and conjoint analysis in new product design", Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 19, pp. 354-364, 2002.
26. A. Scholl, L. Manthey, R. Helm, and M. Steiner, "Solving multiattribute design problems with analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis: An empirical comparison", European Journal of Operational Research, in press.
27. M. Karki, "Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool", World Patent Information, vol. 19, no.4, pp. 269-272, 1997.
28. A. B. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg, Patents, Citations, and Innovations, London: The MIT Press, 2002.