The judged seriousness of an environmental loss is a matter of what caused it

Journal of Environmental Psychology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 13-21

  Brown, Thomas C ^a   Peterson, George L ^a   Brodersen, R Marc ^b   Ford, Valerie ^b   Bell, Paul A ^b  

^a ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^b Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CERVUS ELAPHUS;

EID: 17644382963     PISSN: 02724944     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. A.E. Auhagen & H.-W. Bierhoff (Eds.) Responsibility: The many faces of a social phenomenon 2001 Routledge London
2. K.K. Baker Consorting with forests: Rethinking our relationship to natural resources and how we should value their loss Ecological Law Quarterly 22 1995 677-728
3. J. Baron Heuristics and biases in equity judgments: A utilitarian approach In: B.A. Mellers & J. Baron (Eds.) Psychological perspectives on justice: Theory and applications 1993 Cambridge University Press New York 109-137
4. J. Baron & I. Ritov Intuitions about penalties and compensation in the context of tort law Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7 1993 17-33
5. D. Birnbacher Philosophical foundations of responsibility In: A.E. Auhagen & H.-W. Bierhoff (Eds.) Responsibility: The many faces of a social phenomenon 2001 Routledge London 9-22
6. T.C. Brown D. Nannini R.B. Gorter P.A. Bell & G.L. Peterson Judged seriousness of environmental losses: Reliability and cause of loss Ecological Economics 42 3 2002 479-491
7. H.A. David The method of paired comparisons 2nd ed. 1988 Oxford University Press New York, NY
8. M.L. DeKay & G.H. McClelland Probability and utility components of endangered species preservation programs Journal of Experimental Psychology: Appied 2 1996 60-83
9. P. Dunn-Rankin Scaling methods 1983 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, NJ
10. N. Feigenson J. Park & P. Salovey Effect of blameworthiness and outcome severity on attributions of responsibility and damage awards in comparative negligence cases Law and Human Behavior 21 6 1997 597-617
11. F. Haider The psychology of interpersonal relations 1958 Wiley New York
12. H.L.A. Hart Punishment and responsibility 1968 Oxford University Press New York
13. D. Kahneman I. Ritov K.E. Jacowitz & P. Grant Stated willingness to pay for public goods: A psychological perspective Psychological Science 4 3 1993 310-315
14. M.J. Radin Compensation and commensurability Duke Law Journal 43 1993 56-86
15. J.K. Robbennolt Outcome severity and judgments of "responsibility": A meta-analytic review Journal of Applied Social Psychology 30 12 2000 2575-2609
16. K.G. Shaver Redress and conscientiousness in the attribution of responsibility for accidents Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 6 1 1970 100-110
17. K.G. Shaver The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness 1985 Springer New York
18. K.G. Shaver & D.A. Schutte Towards a broader psychological foundation for responsibility In: A.E. Auhagen & H.-W. Bierhoff (Eds.) Responsibility: The many faces of a social phenomenon 2001 Routledge London 35-47
19. M.E. Walker O.F. Morera J. Vining & B. Orland Disparate WTA-WTP disparities: The influence of human versus natural causes Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 12 3 1999 219-232
20. E. Walster Assignment of responsibility for an accident Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 3 1 1966 73-79
21. B. Weiner Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct 1995 Guilford Press New York
22. D.J. Zickafoose & B.H. Bornstein Double discounting: The effects of comparative negligence on mock juror decision making Law and Human Behavior 23 5 1999 577-596