How should we ethically select living kidney donors when they all are at risk? [7]

American Journal of Transplantation

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1172-1173

  Steiner, Robert ^a  

^a UCSD MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LETTER; LIVING DONOR; MEDICAL ETHICS; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

ETHICS, MEDICAL; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LIVING DONORS; RISK; TISSUE AND ORGAN HARVESTING; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT; TISSUE DONORS; TRANSPLANTS;

EID: 17644376547     PISSN: 16006135     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00886.x     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Spital, Aaron. Rejecting heroic kidney donors protects much more than public trust. Am J Trans 2004; 4: 1727.
2. Steiner R. Risk appreciation for living kidney donors: another new subspecialty? Am J Trans 2004; 4: 694-697.
3. Steiner RW, Gert B. Ethical selection of living kidney donors. Am J Kid Dis 2000; 36: 667-686.
4. Steiner RW, Bennett WM, Gert B. Ethical approaches to living kidney donor education and acceptance. In: Steiner RW ed. Educating, evaluating, and selecting living kidney donors, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2004; 1-12.
5. Steiner RW, Frederici C. The education and counseling process for potential donors and donor attitudes after living kidney donation. In: Steiner RW ed. Educating, evaluating, and selecting living kidney donors, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2004; 129-140.
6. Davis CL. Evaluation of the living kidney donor: current perspectives. Am J Kidney Dis Mar, 2004; 43: 508-530.