An alternate scoring method for the multiple stimulus without replacement preference assessment

Behavioral Interventions

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 121-127

  Ciccone, Francis J ^a,b   Graft, Richard B ^a,b   Ahearn, William H ^a,b  

^a NEW ENGLAND CENTER FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

^b NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CALCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MULTIPLE STIMULUS WITHOUT REPLACEMENT PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT; POINT APPROACH METHOD; POINT WEIGHTING METHOD; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMETRY; REINFORCEMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

EID: 17644373063     PISSN: 10720847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bin.177     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519-532.
2. Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491-498.
3. Pace, G. M., Ivancic, M. T., Edwards, G. L., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1985). Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 249-255.