Small Group Instructional Evaluation across Disciplines

College Teaching

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 106-111

  Coffman, Sara Jane ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17644371885     PISSN: 87567555     EISSN: 19308299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/87567559809596250     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Abbott, R. D., 1990. Satisfaction with processes of collecting student opinions about instruction: a student perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (2): 201–06.
2. Braskamp, L. A., Brandenberg, D. C., and Ory, J. C., 1984. Evaluating teaching effectiveness: A practical guide, Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.
3. Clark, D. J., and Bekey, J., 1979. Use of small groups in instructional evaluation. POD Quarterly, 1 (2) Summer: 87–95.
4. Coffman, S. J., 1991. Improving your teaching through small‐group instructional diagnosis. College Teaching, 39 (2) Spring: 80–2.
5. McKeachie, W. J., and Kaplan, M., 1996. Persistent problems in evaluating college teaching. AAHE Bulletin, February: 5–8.
6. Newby, T., Sherman, M., and Coffman, S. J., Instructional diagnosis: Effective open‐ended faculty evaluation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. April, Chicago, Ill.
7. Redmond, M. V., and Clark, D. J., 1982. Small group instructional diagnosis: A practical approach to improving teaching. AAHE Bulletin, February: 8–10.
8. Seldin, P., 1993. The use and abuse of student ratings of professors. Chronicle of Higher Education, 10 July