Data-model integration is not magic

New Phytologist

Volumn 166, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 367-370

  Classen, Aimée T ^a   Langley, J Adam ^b  

^a OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; FACE; Modeling; TERACC

Indexed keywords

BOTANY; MODEL;

EID: 17644368592     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01414.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Bond WJ, Woodward FI, Midgley GF. 2005. The global distribution of ecosystems in a world without fire. New Phytologist 165: 525-538.
2. Cox PM, Betts RA, Jone CD, Spall SA, Totterdell IJ. 2000. Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature 408: 184-187.
3. Goudriaan J, Shugart HH, Bugmann H, Cramer W, Bondeau A, Gardner RH, Hunt LA, Lauenroth WK, Landsberg JJ, Linder S, Noble IR, Parton WJ, Pitelka LF, Stafford Smith M, Sutherst RW, Valentin C, Woodward FI. 1999. Use of models in global change studies. In: Walker, B, Steffen, W, Canadell, J, Ingram, J, eds. The Terrestrial Biosphere and Global Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 106-140.
4. Hanson PJ, Amthor JS, Wullschleger SD, Wilson KB, Grant RF, Hartley A, Hui D, Hunt ER Jr, Johnson DW, Kimball JS, King AW, Luo Y, McNulty SG, Sun G, Thornton PE, Wang S, Williams M, Baldocchi DD, Cushman RM. 2004. Oak forest carbon and water simulations: model intercomparisons and evaluations against independent data. Ecological Monographs 74: 443-489.
5. Hanson PJ, Todd DE, Amthor JS. 2001. A six year study of sapling and large-tree growth and mortality responses to natural and induced variability in precipitation and throughfall. Tree Physiology 21: 345-358.
6. Knorr W, Prentice IC, House JI, Holland EA. 2005. Long-term sensitivity of soil carbon turnover to warming. Nature 433: 298-301.
7. Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P. 2002. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Synthesis and Perspectives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8. Luo Y, Su B, Currie WS, Dukes JS, Finzi A, Hartwig U, Hungate BA, McMurtrie RE, Oren R, Parton WJ, Pataki DE, Shaw MR, Zak DR, Field CB. 2004. Progressive nitrogen limitation of ecosystem responses to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide. Bioscience 54: 731-739.
9. 2 and its Effects on Plants, Animals, and Ecosystems. New York, USA: Springer, 441-467.
10. Moorcroft PR, Hurtt GC, Pacala SW. 2001. A method for scaling synamics: The ecosystem demography model (ED). Ecological Monographs 71: 557-585.
11. 2. Oecologia 140: 11-25.
12. 2 enrichment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101: 9689-9693.
13. Norby RJ, Ogle K, Curtis PS, Badeck FW, Huth A, Hunt GC, Kohyama T, Peñuelas J. 2001. Aboveground growth and competition in forest gap models: An analysis for studies of climatic change. Climatic Change 51: 415-447.
14. 2 - do photosynthetic and productivity data from FACE experiments support early predictions? New Phytologist 162: 253-280.
15. 2 and temperature: a discussion of observations, measurement methods, and models. New Phytologist 162: 311-322.
16. 2 and N availability regimes? A field test with 16 grassland species. New Phytologist 150: 435-448.
17. 2 increases productivity and invasive species success in an arid ecosystem. Nature 408: 79-82.