Motor imagery in hypnosis: Accuracy and duration of motor imagery in waking and hypnotic states

International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 148-169

  Konradt, Brigitte ^a   Deeb, Salim ^b   Scholz, Oskar Berndt ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPNOSIS; IMAGERY; IMAGINATION; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TASK PERFORMANCE; WAKEFULNESS; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); TIME;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPNOSIS; IMAGINATION; MALE; MOVEMENT; TIME FACTORS; WAKEFULNESS;

EID: 17644366439     PISSN: 00207144     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207140590927572     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ahsen, A. (1987). Epilogue to unvividness paradox. Journal of Mental Imagery, 11, 13-60.
2. Ahsen, A. (1993). A commentary on imagery tests. Journal of Mental Imagery, 17, 153-196.
3. Annett, J. (1995). Motor Imagery: Perception or action? Neuropsychologia, 33, 1395-1417.
4. Barber, T. X., & Wilson, S. C. (1979). The Barber Suggestibility Scale and the Creative Imagination Scale: Experimental and clinical applications. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 21, 84-108.
5. Betts, G. H. (1909). The distributions and functions of mental imagery. Columbia University Teachers College Contributions to Education, 26.
6. Bongartz, W., & Bongartz, B. (2000). Hypnosetherapie [Hypnotherapy] (2nd ed.). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
7. Comey, G., & Kirsch, I. (1999). Intentional and spontaneous imagery in hypnosis: The phenomenology of hypnotic responding. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 47, 65-85.
8. Crawford, H. J. (1994). Brain dynamics and hypnosis: Attentional and disattentional processes. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 92, 204-232.
9. Csákó, R., & Mészâros, I. (2002). Altered-state experiences during relaxation: Do they depend on hypnotic susceptibility? In B. Peter, W. Bongartz, D. Revenstorf, & W. Butollo (Eds.), Munich 2000 - The 15th International Congress of Hypnosis (Hypnosis International Monographs, No. 6 (pp. 137-144). Munich, Germany: MEG-Stiftung.
10. Decety, J., & Jeannerod, M. (1996). Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: Does Fitts' law hold in motor imagery? Behavioural Brain Research, 72, 127-134.
11. Decety, J., Jeannerod, M., & Prablanc, C. (1989). The timing of mentally represented actions. Behavioural Brain Research, 34, 35-42.
12. Eton, D. T., Gilner, F. H., & Munz, D. C. (1998). The measurement of imagery vividness: A test of the reliability and validity of the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire and the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire. Journal of Mental Imagery, 22, 125-136.
13. Farthing, G. W., Venturino, M., & Brown, S. W. (1983). Relationships between two different types of imagery vividness questionnaire items and three hypnotic susceptibility scale factors: A brief communication. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 31, 8-13.
14. Field, P. B. (1965). An inventory scale of hypnotic depth. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 13, 238-249.
15. Glisky, M. L., Tataryn, D. J., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1995). Hypnotizability and mental imagery. International Journal Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 43, 34-54.
16. nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published in 1970)
17. Isaac, A. R., Marks, D. F., & Russell, D. G. (1986). An instrument of assessing imagery of movement: the vividness of movement questionnaire. Journal of Mental Imagery, 10, 23-30.
18. Jeannerod, M., & Frak, V. (1999). Mental imaging of motor activity in humans. Institut des Sciences Cognitives Working Papers 99-8. Retrieved June 16, 2003, from http://www.isc.cnrs.fr/wp/wp99-8.htm
19. Kirchenheim, C., & Persinger, M. A. (1991). Time distortion - A comparison of hypnotic induction and progressive relaxation procedures: A brief communication. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 39, 63-66.
20. Kirsch, I., & Council, J. (1992). Situational and personality correlates of hypnotic responsiveness. In E. Fromm & M. R. Nash (Eds.), Comtemporary hypnosis research (pp. 267-291). New York: Guilford.
21. Kogon, M. M., Jasiukaitis, P., Berardi, A., Gupta, M., Kosslyn, S., & Spiegel, D. (1998). Imagery and hypnotizability revisited. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 46, 363-367.
22. Kohl, R. M., Fisicaro, S. A., Roenker, D. L. & Turner, M. K. (1998). A note on state individual differences in accuracy of response imagery. Aftereffects and Reminiscence. Brain and Cognition, 38, 369-377.
23. Marks, D. F., & Isaac, A. R. (1995). Topographical distribution of EEG activity accompanying visual and motor imagery in vivid and non-vivid imagers. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 86, 271-282.
24. Page, R. A. (1998). Mental imagery, hypnotizability, differential item difficulty, and context effects, American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 41, 162-167.
25. Papaxanthis, C., Pozzo, T., Skoura, X., & Schieppati, M. (2002). Does order and timing in performance of imagined and actual movements affect motor imagery process? The duration of walking and writing task. Behavioural Brain Research, 134, 209-215.
26. Papaxanthis, C., Schieppati, M., Gentili, R., & Pozzo, T. (2002). Imagined and actual arm movements have similar durations when performed under different conditions of directions and mass. Experimental Brain Research, 143, 447-452.
27. Perry, C. (1973). Imagery, fantasy, and hypnotic susceptibility: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 217-221.
28. Roelofs, K., Hoogduin, K. A. L., & Keijsers, G. P. (2002). Motor imagery during hypnotic arm paralysis in high and low hypnotizable participants. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 50, 51-66.
29. Sarbin, T. R., & Coe, W. C. (1972). Hypnosis: A social psychological analysis of influence communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
30. Scholz, O. B. (2001). Kurz- und mittelfristige Effekte hypnotischer Stimmungsinduktion [SHORT- and long-term effects of the hypnotic induction of different moods]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 209, 118-136.
31. Scholz, O. B. (2002). Freiberger Imaginations-, Relaxations- und Suggestibilitätstest (FIRST) [Freiberger Imagination, Relaxation, and Suggestibility Test]. Eschborn, Germany: Verlag Dietmar Klotz.
32. Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
33. Spanos, N. P. (1991). Imagery, hypnosis, and hypnotizability. In R. G. Kunzendorf (Ed.), Mental Imagery (pp. 79-88). New York: Plenum.
34. St. Jean, R., & MacLeod, C. (1983). Hypnosis, absorption, and time perception. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 92, 81-86.
35. St. Jean, R., McInnis, K., Campbell-Mayne, L., & Swainson, P. (1994). Hypnotic underestimation of time: The busy beaver hypothesis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 565-569.
36. St. Jean, R., & Robertson, L. (1986). Attentional versus absorptive processing in hypnotic time estimation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 40-42.
37. Stevenson, J. H. (1976). Effect of posthypnotic dissociation on the performance of interfering tasks. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 85, 398-407.
38. Sutcliffe, J. P., Perry, C. W., & Sheehan, P. W. (1970). The relation of some aspects of imagery and fantasy to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 76, 279-287.
39. Van Dyne, W. T., & Stava, L. J. (1981). Analysis of relationships among hypnotic susceptibility, personality type, and vividness of mental imagery. Psychological Reports, 48, 23-26.