Two cases of segmental multiple glomangiomas in a family: Type 1 or type 2 segmental manifestation?

Dermatology

Volumn 201, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 65-67

  Peña Penabad, Carmen ^a,d   Garcia Silva J ^a   Del Pozo, J ^a   Yebra Pimentel, M T ^a   Fonseca, E ^a   Cuevas, J ^b   Contreras, F ^c  

^a HOSPITAL JUAN CANALEJO   (Spain)

^b Regional General Hospital   (Mexico)

^c HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LA PAZ   (Spain)

^d NONE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Multiple glomangiomas; Type 1 segmental arrangement; Type 2 segmental arrangement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT DISORDER; CASE REPORT; CHILD; CLINICAL FEATURE; FEMALE; GENODERMATOSIS; GLOMUS TUMOR; HUMAN; MOSAICISM; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 17544390089     PISSN: 10188665     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000018435     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Parsons ME, Russo G, Fucich L, Millikan LE, Kim R: Multiple glomus tumors. Int J Dermatol 1997;36:894-900.
2. Happle R, König A: Type 2 segmental manifestation of multiple glomus tumors: A review and reclassification of 5 case reports. Dermatology 1999;198:270-272.
3. Pepper MC, Laubenheimer R, Cripps DJ: Multiple glomus tumors. J Cutan Pathol 1977;4: 244-257.
4. Rudolph R: Familial multiple glomangiomas. Ann Plast Surg 1993;30:183-185.
5. Lawlor KB, Helm TH, Narurkar V, Vidimos A: Stump the experts - Multiple glomus tumors. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1994;20:572, 629-630.
6. Mora Morillas I, Sánchez Yus E, Sánchez Lozano JL, Abad Asensio E, García Pérez A: Glomangiomatosis múltiple diseminada. Actas Dermosifiliogr 1987;78:239-243.
7. Yoon TY, Lee HT, Chang SH: Giant congenital multiple patch-like glomus tumors. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999;40:826-828.
8. Landthaler M, Braun-Falco O, Eckert F, Stoltz W, Dorn M, Wolff HH: Congenital multiple plaquelike glomus tumors. Arch Dermatol 1990;26:1203-1207.
9. Yang JS, Ko JW, Suh KS, Kim ST: Congenital multiple plaque-like glomangiomyoma. Am J Dermatopathol 1999;21:454-457.
10. Happle R: A rule concerning the segmental manifestation of autosomal dominant skin disorders: Review of clinical examples providing evidence for dichotomous types of severity. Arch Dermatol 1997;133:1505-1509.
11. Happle R: Loss of heterozygosity in human skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999;41:143-161.
12. Happle R: Segmental forms of autosomal dominant skin disorders: Different types of severity reflect different states of zygosity. Am J Med Genet 1996;66:241-242
13. Merino Monje E, Guerra Tapia A, Moreno Izquierdo R, Barrio Fuertes A: Multiple glomus tumors: Regional and disseminated form in the same patient - Report of a case (in Spanish). Actas Dermosifiliogr 1978;69:393-398.