Famous artefacts: Spearman's hypothesis

Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 665-694

  Schönemann, Peter H ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Artefacts; Black white iq differences; Group differences on mental tests; Racism; Spearman g; Spearman hypothesis

Indexed keywords

EID: 17544388108     PISSN: 02499185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Angoff, W. H. (1971). The College Board Admissions Testing Program: A technical report on research and development activities relating the Scholastic Aptitude Test and achievement tests. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
2. Brandt, C. (1985). Jensen's compromise with componentialism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 222-223.
3. Brigham, C. (1923). A study of American intelligence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
4. Carlson, J. S. (1985). The issue of g: Some relevant questions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 224-225.
5. Cattell, R. B. (1985). Intelligence and g: An imaginative treatment of unimaginative data. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 227-228.
6. Chase, A. (1980). The legacy of Malthus: The social cost of the new scientific racism. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
7. Estes, W. K. E. (1992). Ability testing. Postscript on ability tests, testing, and public policy. Cognitive Science, 5, 278.
8. Gordon, R. A. (1987). Jensen's contribution concerning test bias: A contextual view. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil, C. (Eds.), Arthur Jensen: Consensus and controversy (pp. 77-154). New York: Falmer Press.
9. Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: Norton.
10. Guttman, L. (1992). The irrelevance of factor analysis for the study of group differences. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 175-204.
11. Hearnshaw, L. S. (1979). Cyril Bun psychologist New York: Vintage.
12. Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve. New York: Free Press.
13. Hirsch, J. (1981). To 'unfrock the charlatans'. Sage Race Relations Abstracts, 6, 1-67.
14. Holland, J. L., & Richards, J. M. Jr. (1965). Academic and Non-Academic Accomplishment: Correlated or Uncorrelated? ACT Research Reports, No. 2. Iowa City: American College Testing Program.
15. Horn, J., & Goldsmith, H. (1981). Reader be cautious: A review of Bias in Mental Testing. American Journal of Education, 89, 305-329.
16. Humphreys, L. G. (1968). The fleeting nature of the prediction of college academic success. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 375-380.
17. Humphreys, L. G. (1985a). Race differences and the Spearman hypothesis. Intelligence, 9, 275-283.
18. Humphreys, L. G. (1985b). Attenuated hypothesis or attentuated test of hypothesis. Intelligence, 9, 291-295.
19. Jensen, A. R. (1970). Statement of Dr. Arthur R. Jensen before the General Subcommittee on Education, House Education and Labor Committee. Washington: Congressional Record, 1-237.
20. Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.
21. Jensen, A. R. (1985). The nature of Black-White differences on various psychometric tests: Spearman's hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 193-263.
22. Jensen, A. R. (1987). Differential psychology: Towards consensus. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), Arthur Jensen: Consensus and controversy (pp. 353-399). New York: Falmer Press.
23. Jones, L. V. (1985). Golly g: Interpreting Spearman's general factor. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 233.
24. Kline, P. (1985). The nature of psychometric g. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 234.
25. Maraun, M. D. (1996). Metaphor taken as math: Indeterminacy in the factor analysis model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31, 517-538.
26. Modgil, S., & Modgil, C. (Eds.) (1987). Arthur Jensen: Consensus and controversy. New York: Falmer Press.
27. Moss, G. L. (1985). Toward the final solution: A history of European racism. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
28. Mulaik, S. A. (1986). Factor analysis and Psychometrika: Major developments. Psychometrika, 51, 23-34.
29. Nagoshi, C. T., Johnson, R. C., DeFries, J. C., Wilson, J. R., & Vandenberg, S. G. (1984). Group differences and first principal-component loadings in the Hawaii Family Study of Cognition: a test of the generality of 'Spearman's hypothesis'. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 751-753.
30. Nettlebeck, T. (1985). What reaction times time. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 235.
31. Nichols, R. C. (1985). Intelligence and its biological substrate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 236.
32. Pearson, K., & Moul, M. (1925). The problem of alien immigration into Great Britain, illustrated by an examination of Russian and Polish Jewish children. Annals of Eugenics, 1, 1-127.
33. Peters, D. P., & Ceci, S. J. (1982). Peer review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 187-195.
34. Robitscher, J. (1973). Eugenic sterilization. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
35. Schönemann, P. H. (1971). The minimum correlation between equivalent sets of uncorrelated factors. Psychometrika, 36, 21-30. Erratum. Psychometrika, 1973, 38, 149.
36. Schönemann, P. H. (1978). Some nontrivial implications of factor indeterminacy. Paper read at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Multivariate Experimental Psychology, Cincinnati, Ohio.
37. Schönemann, P. H. (1981a). Factorial definitions of intelligence: Dubious legacy of dogma in data analysis. In I. Borg (Ed.), Multidimensional data representations: When and why. Ann Arbor, MI: Mathesis Press.
38. Schönemann. P. H. (1981b). Power as a function of communality in factor analysis. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 17, 57-60.
39. Schönemann, P. H. (1985). On artefical intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 241-242.
40. Schönemann, P. H. (1987). Jensen's g: Outmoded theories and unconquered frontiers. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), Arthur Jensen: Consensus and controversy (pp. 311-327). New York: Falmer Press.
41. Schönemann, P. H. (1989). Some new results of the Spearman Hypothesis artifact. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 463-464.
42. Schönemann, P. H. (1990). Environmental versus genetic variance component models for the identical twin data by Shields. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 10, 451-473.
43. Schönemann, P. H. (1992). Extension of Guttman's result from g to PC1. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 219-224.
44. 2. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 35, 59-65.
45. Schönemann, P. H. (1996a). The psychopathology of factor indeterminacy. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31, 571-577.
46. Schönemann, P. H. (1996b). Syllogisms of factor indeterminacy. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31, 651-654.
47. Schönemann, P. H. (in press). On models and muddles of heritability, Genetica.
48. Schönemann, P. H., & Schönemann, R. D. (1994). Environmental versus genetic models for Osborne's personality data on identical and fraternal twins. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 13, 141-167.
49. Schönemann P. H., & Wang, M. M. (1972). Some new results on factor indeterminacy. Psychometrika, 37, 61-91.
50. Schrader, W. B. (1971). The predictive validity of College Board Admission Tests. In W. H. Angoff (Ed.), The College Board Admissions Testing Program: A technical report on research and development activities relating the Scholastic Aptitude Test and achievement tests. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
51. Shockley, W. (1971). Models, mathematics, and the moral obligation to diagnose the origin of negro IQ deficits. Review of Educational Research, 369-377.
52. Shockley, W. (1987). Jensen's data on Spearman's hypothesis: No artifact. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10, 512.
53. Spearman, C. S. (1927). The abilities of man. New York: MacMillan.
54. Steiger, J. H., & Schönemann. P. H. (1976). A history of factor indeterminacy. In S. Shye (Ed.), Theory construction and data analysis in the social sciences (pp. 136-178). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
55. Westinghouse Learning Corporation (1969). The impact of head start. Akron, OH: Ohio University.
56. Wahlsten, D. (1990). Insensity of the analysis of variance to heredity-environment interactions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 109-120.
57. Wilson, J. R. (1985). Jensen's support for Spearman's hypothesis is support for a circular argument. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 246.