Breakdown of spatial parallel coding in children's drawing

Developmental Science

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 226-228

  De Bruyn, Bart ^a   Davis, Alyson ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ART; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECORDING;

AGE FACTORS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ART; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COPYING PROCESSES; CUES; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 17544375936     PISSN: 1363755X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00411.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Beck, J. (1966). Perceptual grouping produced by changes in orientation and shape. Science, 154, 538-540.
2. Berkley, M.A., De Bruyn, B., & Orban, G.A. (1994). Illusory, motion, and luminance defined contours interact in the human visual system. Vision Research, 34, 209-216.
3. Bremner, J.G. (1984). Errors towards the perpendicular in children's copies of angular figures: a test of the bisection interpretation. Perception, 13, 117-128.
4. Bremner, J.G., & Taylor, J. (1982). Children's errors in copying angles: perpendicular error or bisection error? Perception, 11, 163-171.
5. Bryant, P.E. (1969). Perception and memory of the orientation of visually presented lines by children. Nature, 224, 1331-1332.
6. Bryant, P.E. (1974). Perception and understanding in young children. London: Methuen.
7. Dakin, S.C., Williams, C.B., & Hess, R.F. (1999). The interaction of first- and second-order cues to orientation. Vision Research, 39, 2867-2884.
8. Davis, A.M. (1983). Contextual sensitivity in young children's drawings. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35, 478-486.
9. Freeman, N.H. (1975). Do children draw men with arms coming out of the head? Nature, 254, 416-417.
10. Freeman, N.H. (1980). Strategies of representation in young children. New York: Academic Press.
11. Freeman, N.H., & Kelman, S.E. (1981). The interference of a baseline with children's orientation judgement need not entirely mask their contextual responsiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33, 145-154.
12. Freeman, N.H., Chen, M.J., & Hambly, M. (1984). Children's different use of alignment cues when encoding and when producing a match-to-target. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2, 123-137.
13. Freeman, N.H., & Cox, M.V. (Eds.) (1985). Visual order: The nature and development of pictorial representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Ibbotson, A., & Bryant, P.E. (1976). The perpendicular error and the vertical effect in children's drawing. Perception, 5, 319-326.
15. Naeli, H., & Harris, P. (1976). Orientation of the diamond and the square. Perception, 5, 73-77.
16. Nothdurft, H.C. (1991). Texture segmentation and pop-out from orientation contrast. Vision Research, 31, 1073-1078.
17. Perner, J., Kohlmann, R., & Wimmer, H. (1984). Young children's recognition and use of the vertical and horizontal in drawings. Child Development, 55, 1637-1645.
18. Regan, D. (2000). Human perception of objects. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
19. Somerville, D., & Cox, M.V. (1988). Sources of error in the Piagetian water-level task. Perception, 17, 249-254.