Cooperative work: The role of explanation in creating a shared problem representation

Travail Humain

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2000, Pages

  Karsenty, L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PAUL SABATIER   (France)

Author keywords

Cognitive ergonomics; Collective decision making; Shared representations; Synchronous and asynchronous communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 17444448573     PISSN: 00411868     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abelson, R. P., & Lalljee, M. (1988). Knowledge Structures and Causal Explanation. In D. J. Hilton (Ed.), Contemporary Science and Natural Explanation. Commonsense Conceptions of Causality (pp. 175-203). Sussex, UK: Harvester Press.
2. Baker, M. J. (1993). Negociation in Collaborative Problem-Solving Dialogues. In M. J. Baker, R. J. Beun, & M. Reiner (Eds.), Natural Dialogue and Student Modelling. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
3. Bannon, L. J. (1996). From requirements as texts to requirements as constructions: Enphasizing use, process and iteration in systems development. Paper presented at the Workshop on Requirement Engineering in a Changing World, CAISE 96. Crete, Greece, May.
4. Bannon, L. J., & Kuutti, K. (1996). Shifting Perspectives on Organizational Memory: From Storage to Active Remembering. Paper presented at the 29th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-29). Maui, Hawaii, January.
5. Belkin, N. J. (1988). On the nature and function of explanation in intelligent information retrieval. Proceedings of the 11th Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Grenoble, France, Juin.
6. Bellotti, V. (1993). Integrating Theoricians' and Practicionners' Perspectives with Design Rationale. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (INTERCHI'93). Amsterdam, The Netherlands, April.
7. Bisseret, A., Sebillotte, S., & Falzon, P. (1999). Techniques pratiques pour l'étude des activités expertes. Toulouse: Octarès.
8. Cawsey, A. (1993). Planning interactive explanations. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38, 169-199.
9. Clancey, W. J. (1983). The Epistemoiogy of a Rule-Based Expert System. A Framework for Explanation. Artificial Intelligence, 20, 215-251.
10. Conklin, J. E., & Yakemovic, B. (1991). A Process-Oriented Approach to Design Rationale. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 357-391.
11. Cross, N. (1986). Understanding design: the lessons of design methodology. Design Methods and Theories, 20, 409-438.
12. Dennis, A. R., Heminger, J. F., Nunamaker, J. F., & Vogel, D. (1990). Bringing automated support to large groups: The Burr-Brown experience. Information and Management, 18, 111-121.
13. Draper, S. W. (1987). Spontaneous Explanation. Proceedings of the 3rd Alvey Explanation Workshop (pp. 74-82). University of Edinburgh, UK: Guilford.
14. Fischer, G. (1987). Cognitive view of reuse and redesign. IEEE Software, 4, 60-72.
15. Garfinkel, A. (1981). Forms of Explanation. Rethinking the Questions in Social Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16. Gilbert, N. (1989). Explanation and Dialogue. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 4, 235-247.
17. Goguen, J. A., Weiner, J. L., & Linde, C. (1983). Reasoning and natural explanation. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 19, 521-559.
18. Grusenmeyer, C. (1995). De l'analyse des communications à celle des représentations foncnorinelles partagées. Une application à la relève de poste. Ph.D. dissertation, Université René-Descartes, Paris, France.
19. Hilton, D. J. (1988). Logic and Causal Attribution. In D. J. Hilton (Ed.), Contemporary Science and Natural Explanation. Commonsense Conceptions of Causality (pp. 33-65). Sussex, UK: Harvester Press.
20. Hilton, D. J., & Slugoski, B. R. (1986). Knowledge-based causal attribution: The abnormal conditions focus model. Psychological Review, 9, 75-88.
21. Karsenty, L. (1994). Explaining a solution in design dialogues. Ph.D. dissertation, University Paris VIII, Saint-Denis, France.
22. Karsenty, L. (1996). An Empirical Evaluation of Design Rationale Documents, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'96). Vancouver, Canada, April.
23. Karsenty, L. (1999). Cooperative work and shared visual context: An empirical study of comprehension problems in side by side and remote help dialogues. Human-Computer Interaction, 14, 283-315.
24. Karsenty, L., & Brézillon, P. (1995a). Coopération Homme-Machine et Explication. Le Travail Humain, 58, 291-312.
25. Karsenty, L., & Brézillon, P. (1995b). Cooperative problem solving and explanation. International Journal of Expert Systems faith Applications, 8, 443-462.
26. Karsenty, L., Bigot, V., & De Brito, G. (1995). L'utilisation des procédures écrites dans les avions de nouvelle génération (Report no T-95-023). Toulouse: EURISCO.
27. Karsenty, L., & Pavard, B. (1998). Various levels of context analysis in the ergonomic study of cooperative work. Reseaux: The French Journal of Communication, 6, 167-193.
28. Kemp, E. A., & Kemp, R. H. (1991). Explanation in Knowledge-Based Systems: A User Perspective. Paper presented at the IJCAI-91 Workshop on Explanation Generation for KB Systems. Sydney, Australia, August.
29. Klein, M., & Lu, S. C. Y. (1989). Conflict resolution in cooperative design. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 4, 168-180.
30. Lee, J., & Lai, K. (1991). What's in Design Rationale? Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 251-280.
31. Leplat, J. (1988). Organization of activity in collective tasks. Paper presented at the Workshop "Distributed decision making". Bad Homburg, Germany.
32. MacLean, A., Young, R. M., Bellotti, V. M. E., & Moran, T. P. (1991). Questions, Options, and Criteria; Elements of Design Space Analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 201-250.
33. Moore, J. D. (1989). A Reactive Approach to Explanation. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, UCLA.
34. Moran, T. P., & Carroll, J. M. (Eds.). (1996). Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
35. Navarro, C. (1991). Une analyse cognitive de l'interaction dans les activités de travail. Le Travail Humain, 54, 113-128.
36. Paris, C. L. (1988). Tailoring object descriptions to a user's level of expertise. Computational Linguistics, 14, 64-78.
37. Ramberg, R. (1996). Construing and Testing Explanations in a Complex Domain. Computers in Human Behavior, 12, 29-48.
38. Richard, J. F. (1990). Les Activités Mentales. Comprendre, Raisonner, Trouver des Solutions. Paris: Armand Colin.
39. Schank, R. C. (1986). Explanation Patterns. Understanding Mechanically and Creatively, Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
40. Schmidt, K. (1994). Cooperative work and its articulation: Requirements for computer support. Le Travail Humain, 57, 345-366.
41. Schmidt, K., & Bannon, L. (1992). Taking CSCW seriously: Supporting articulation work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1, 7-40.
42. Slugoski, B. R., Lalljee, M., Lamb, R., & Ginsburg, G. P. (1993). Attribution in conversational context: Effect of mutual knowledge on explanation-giving. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 219-238.
43. Teach, R. L., & Shortliffe, E. H. (1984). An Analysis of Physicians' Attitudes. In B. G. Buchanan & E. H. Shortliffe (Eds.), Rule-Based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project (pp. 635-652. Reading, USA: Addison-Wesley.
44. Terssac, G. de, & Chabaud, C. (1990). Référentiel operatif commun et fiabilité. In J. Leplat & G. de Terssac (Eds.), Les facteurs humains de la fiabité dans les systèmes complexes (pp. 111-139). Toulouse: Octarès.
45. Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Waern, Y , Osterlund, B., & Ramberg, R. (1995). On the role of explanations in understanding complex domain. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 203, 245-258.
47. Wallis, J. W., & Shortliffe, E. H. (1984). Customized Explanations Using Causal Knowledge. In B. G. Buchanan & E. H. Shordiffe (Eds.), Rule-Based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project (pp. 371-388). Reading, USA: Addison-Wesley.
48. Walz, D., Elam, J., Krasner, H., & Curtis, B. (1987). A Methodology for Studying Software Design Teams: an Investigation of Conflict Behaviors in the Requirements Definition Phase. In G. M. Olson, S. Sheppard, & E. Soloway (Eds.), Empirical Studies of Programmers (pp. 83-99). Norwood, USA: Ablex.
49. Wibaux, F. (1992). L'implicite dans la prescription: Le cas de la formation au pilotage de l'A320. Mémoire de DEA, CNAM, Paris.
50. Wick, M. R., & Slagle, J. M. (1989). The Partitioned Support Network for Expert System Justification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 19, 528-535.