Anomalous Fluctuations in Phases with a Broken Continuous Symmetry

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 92, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 272031-272034

  Zwerger, W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIFERROMAGNETIC MATERIALS; CONDENSATION; CORRELATION METHODS; FUNCTIONS; GROUND STATE; MAGNETIC COUPLINGS; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MAGNETIZATION; NEUTRON SCATTERING; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; QUANTUM THEORY; ROTATION; VECTORS;

BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATES (BEC); GOLDSTONE MODES;

THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 17444441804     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. M. E. Fisher and M. N. Barber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 1516 (1972).
2. S. Giorgini, L. P. Pitaevski, and S. Stringari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5040 (1999).
3. F. Meier and W. Zwerger, Phys. Rev. A 60, 5133 (1999).
4. A. Z. Patashinski and V. L. Pokrovski, Sov. Phys. JETP 37, 733 (1974). The phenomenon was independently discovered for Goldstone particles in high energy physics where it gives rise to logarithmic singularities because one is in four dimensions. See L. F. Li and H. Pagels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 1204 (1971).
5. A. Z. Patashinski and V. L. Pokrovski, Sov. Phys. JETP 37, 733 (1974). The phenomenon was independently discovered for Goldstone particles in high energy physics where it gives rise to logarithmic singularities because one is in four dimensions. See L. F. Li and H. Pagels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 1204 (1971).
6. S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 59, 14054 (1999).
7. G. Parisi, Statistical Field Theory (Perseus Books, Reading, Massachusetts, 1998).
8. F. Dunlop and C. M. Newman, Commun. Math. Phys. 44, 223 (1975), Theorem 13.
9. s∼ V scales with volume in the usual manner.
10. c, there is a crossover to critical singularities, as discussed, e.g., by X. S. Chen, V. Dohm, and N. Schultka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3641 (1996).
11. P. Hasenfratz and H. Leutwyler, Nucl. Phys. B343, 241 (1990).
12. S. Chakravarty, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 481 (1991).
13. The result (11) continues to hold for an ideal Bose gas; however, the numerical constant is larger by a factor of 2 (see Ref. [3]).
14. S. Chakravarty, B. I. Halperin, and D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. B 39, 2344 (1989).
15. M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. Hänsch, and I. Bloch, Nature (London) 415, 39 (2002).
16. s.
17. A. V. Chubukov, S. Sachdev, and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. B 49, 11 919 (1994).
18. G. Aeppli et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2052 (1989).