Temporal integration characteristics of the axial and choroidal responses to myopic defocus induced by prior form deprivation versus positive spectacle lens wear in chickens

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 82, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 318-327

  Nickla, Debora L ^a   Sharda, Vandhana ^a   Troilo, David ^a  

^a NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chickens; Choroids; Emmetropization; Myopic defocus; Ocular growth; Spectacle lenses

Indexed keywords

DISEASES; ERROR ANALYSIS; EYE CONTROLLED DEVICES; OPTICAL INSTRUMENT LENSES; ULTRASONICS;

EMMETROPIZATION SYSTEMS; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; SPECTACLE LENS; VISUAL SIGNALS;

VISION;

A SCAN; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BIRD; CHICKEN; CHOROID; LENS; MYOPIA; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; RETINOSCOPY; SPECTACLES;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; CHICKENS; CHOROID; EYE; EYEGLASSES; FORM PERCEPTION; MYOPIA; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; TIME FACTORS; VISION;

EID: 17444433005     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.OPX.0000159368.31481.DE     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Wiesel TN, Raviola E. Myopia and eye enlargement after neonatal lid fusion in monkeys. Nature 1977;266:66-8.
2. Smith EL III, Harwerth RS, Crawford ML, von Noorden GK. Observations on the effects of form deprivation on the refractive status of the monkey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987;28:1236-45.
3. Troilo D, Judge SJ, Ridley R, Baker H. Myopia induced by brief visual deprivation in a new world primate - the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990;31(suppl):254.
4. Troilo D, Judge SJ. Ocular development and visual deprivation myopia in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Vision Res 1993;33:1311-24.
5. Wallman J, Turkel J, Trachtman J. Extreme myopia produced by modest change in early visual experience. Science 1978;201:1249-51.
6. Norton TT. Experimental myopia in tree shrews. CIBA Found Symp 1990;155:178-94; discussion 94-9.
7. Yinon U, Koslowe KC, Rassin MI. The optical effects of eyelid closure on the eyes of kittens reared in light and dark. Curr Eye Res 1984;3:431-9.
8. Wallman J, Adams JI. Developmental aspects of experimental myopia in chicks: susceptibility, recovery and relation to emmetropization. Vision Res 1987;27:1139-63.
9. Schaeffel F, Troilo D, Wallman J, Howland HC. Developing eyes that lack accommodation grow to compensate for imposed defocus. Vis Neurosci 1990;4:177-83.
10. Andison ME, Sivak JG, Bird DM. The refractive development of the eye of the American kestrel (Falco sparverius): a new avian model. J Comp Physiol (A) 1992;170:5 65-74.
11. Siegwart JT, Norton TT. Refractive and ocular changes in tree shrews raised with plus or minus lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34(suppl):1208.
12. Smith EL III, Hung LF, Harwerth RS. Effects of optically induced blur on the refractive status of young monkeys. Vision Res 1994;34:293-301.
13. Hung LF, Crawford ML, Smith EL III. Spectacle lenses alter eye growth and the refractive status of young monkeys. Nat Med 1995;1:761-5.
14. Shaikh AW, Siegwart JT Jr, Norton TT. Effect of interrupted lens wear on compensation for a minus lens in tree shrews. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:308-15.
15. Rada JA, McFarland AL, Cornuet PK, Hassell JR. Proteoglycan synthesis by scierai chondrocytes is modulated by a vision dependent mechanism. Curr Eye Res 1992;11:767-82.
16. Wallman J, Wildsoet C, Xu A, Gottlieb MD, Nickla DL, Marran L, Krebs W, Christensen AM. Moving the retina: choroidal modulation of refractive state. Vision Res 1995;35:37-50.
17. Schaeffel F, Hagel G, Bartmann M, Kohler K, Zrenner E. 6-Hydroxy dopamine does not affect lens-induced refractive errors but suppresses deprivation myopia. Vision Res 1994;34:143-9.
18. Kee CS, Marzani D, Wallman J. Differences in time course and visual requirements of ocular responses to lenses and diffusers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:575-83.
19. Wildsoet C, Wallman J. Choroidal and scierai mechanisms of compensation for spectacle lenses in chicks. Vision Res 1995;35:1175-94.
20. Troilo D, Wallman J. The regulation of eye growth and refractive state: an experimental study of emmetropization. Vision Res 1991;31:1237-50.
21. Sharda V, Troilo D, Nickla DL. Temporal integration characteristics of responses to myopic defocus induced by spectacle lenses versus form deprivation in chicks. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:E-abstract 191.
22. Nickla DL, Wildsoet C, Wallman J. Visual influences on diurnal rhythms in ocular length and choroidal thickness in chick eyes. Exp Eye Res 1998;66:163-81.
23. Nickla DL, Troilo D. Brief daily periods of vision cause rapid, transient changes in axial length and choroid thickness in form deprived chick eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:S297.
24. Schmid KL, Wildsoet CF. Effects on the compensatory responses to positive and negative lenses of intermittent lens wear and ciliary nerve section in chicks. Vision Res 1996;36:1023-36.
25. Winawer J, Wallman J. Temporal constraints on lens compensation in chicks. Vision Res 2002;42:2651-68.
26. Schaeffel F, Howland HC. Properties of the feedback loops controlling eye growth and refractive state in the chicken. Vision Res 1991;31:717-34.
27. Gottlieb MD, Marran L, Xu A, Nickla DL, Wallman J. The emmetropization process in chicks is compromised by dim light. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32:S1203.
28. Wildsoet CF, Schmid KL. The effects of spectacle lenses on recovery from form deprivation myopia in chicks and the secondary effect of optic nerve section. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996;37:S686.
29. Wildsoet CF, Schmid KL. Optical correction of form deprivation myopia inhibits refractive recovery in chick eyes with intact or sectioned optic nerves. Vision Res 2000;40:3273-82.
30. van Alphen GW. On emmetropia and ametropia. Opt Acta (Lond) 1961;142(suppl):1-92.
31. Nickla DL, Johnson C, Lytle G. Phase relationships between the diurnal rhythms in axial length and choroidal thickness and their association with ocular growth rates in chicks. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:E-abstract 1158.
32. Marzani D, Wallman J. Growth of the two layers of the chick sciera is modulated reciprocally by visual conditions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997;38:1726-39.
33. Winawer JA, Zhu X, Park T, Wallman J. Is myopic blur more important than sharp vision for positive-lens compensation? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:S136.
34. Zhu X, Winawer JA, Wallman J. Potency of myopic defocus in spectacle lens compensation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:2818-27.
35. Nickla DL, Panos SN, Fugate-Wentzek LA, Gottlieb MD, Wallman J. What attributes of visual stimulation determine whether chick eyes develop deprivation myopia? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989;30(suppl):31.
36. Napper GA, Brennan NA, Barrington M, Squires MA, Vessey GA, Vingrys AJ. The duration of normal visual exposure necessary to prevent form deprivation myopia in chicks. Vision Res 1995;35:1337-44.