Packaging models for the storage and distribution of complex digital objectsin archival information systems: A review of MPEG-21 DID principles

Multimedia Systems

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 286-301

  Bekaert, Jeroen ^a,b   De Kooning, Emiel ^b   Van De Walle, Rik ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b Dept of Architecture and Urbanism   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Complex digital object; MPEG 21 DID; OAIS Reference Model

Indexed keywords

CODES (STANDARDS); COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; DATA REDUCTION; DIGITAL LIBRARIES; IMAGE COMPRESSION; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS; XML;

ARCHIVAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; DIGITAL OBJECTS; ISO OAIS REFERENCE MODELS; MPEG; PACKAGING MODELS;

IMAGE CODING;

EID: 17444422825     PISSN: 09424962     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00530-005-0163-x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Advance Distributed Learning (2003) The Sharable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM), version 1.3, WD, March 2003
2. Beaubien R, Hurley B (2001) (University of California, Berkeley Library), the making of America II. http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/MOA2
3. Bekaert J, Hochstenbach P, De Neve W, Van de Sompel H, Van de Walle R (2003) Suggestions concerning MPEG-21 Digital Item Declaration, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, M9755, Trondheim, Norway, July 2003
4. CCSDS Panel 2 (2003) XML structure and construction rules concept paper, August 2003. http://www.ccsds.org/docu/dscgi/ds.py/Get/File-727/0831XFDUv09.pdf
5. deCarmo L (1999) Core Java multimedia framework. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
6. De Keukelaere F, Rogge B, Van de Walle R (2001) Temporal synchronization of media within MPEG-21 Digital Items. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, M7728, Pattaya, December 2001
7. IMS Global Learning Consortium (2001) IMS Content Packaging XML Binding, version 1.1.2, final specification
8. Kahn R, Wilensky R (1995) A framework for distributed digital object services. Corporation for National Research Initiatives, http://www.cnri.reston. va.us/k-w.html
9. Library of Congress (1999) EAD application guidelines for version 1.0. http://www.loc.gov/ead/ag/agappb.html
10. Library of Congress (2005) Marc Standards Office, MARC standards, January 2005. http://www.loc.gov/marc
11. Library of Congress (2002) Metadata encoding and transmission standard, February 2002. http://www.loc.gov/Standards/mets
12. Library of Congress (2004) Network Development and MARC Standards Office, International Standard, ISO 23950: Information Retrieval (Z39.50): Application service definition and protocol specification, February 2004. http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency
13. ISO/IEC, MPEG-21, Information Technology, Multimedia Framework, Part 1 : Vision, technologies and strategy, ISO/IEC TR 21000-1:2001, December 2001
14. ISO/IEC, MPEG-21, Information Technology, Multimedia Framework, Part 2: Digital Item Declaration, ISO/IEC 21000-2:2003, March 2003
15. ISO/IEC, MPEG-21, Information Technology, Multimedia Framework, Part 2: Digital Item Declaration, 2nd edn WD v.2, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, N6409, Munich, March 2004
16. ISO/IEC, MPEG-21, Information Technology, Multimedia Framework, Part 3: Digital Item Identification, ISO/IEC 21000-3:2003, March 2003
17. ISO/IEC, MPEG-21, Information Technology, Multimedia Framework, Part 7: Digital Item Adaptation, FCD, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC 29/WG 11, N5933, Brisbane, October 2003
18. ISO/IEC, MPEG-21, Information Technology, Multimedia Framework, Part 10: MPEG-21 Digital Item Processing, Study of CD, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, N6415, Munich, March 2004
19. Nelson ML, Argue B, Efron M, Denn S, Pattuelli MC (2001) A survey of complex object technologies for digital libraries, NASA/TM-2001-211426, December 2001
20. OCLC/RLG (2002) A recommendation for preservation description information, April 2002. http://www.oclc.org/research/pmwg/
21. Rogge B, Bekaert J, Van de Walle R (2004) Timing issues in multimedia formats: review of the principles and comparison of existing formats. IEEE Trans Multimedia 6(6):910-924
22. Space data and information transfer systems, Open Archival Information System, reference model, ISO 14721:2003, February 2003
23. TEI Consortium (2003) Text Encoding Initiative (TEI), August 2001 (revised January 2003). http://www.tei-c.org
24. Wahl T, Rothermel K (1993) Representing time in multimedia systems. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on multimedia computing and systems, pp 538-543
25. W3C (2004) OWL, Web Ontology Language, recommendation, February 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/
26. W3C (2004) RDF, Resource Description Framework, recommendation, February 2004. http://www.w3.org/RDF/
27. W3C (2001) Synchronized multimedia integration language specification (SMIL 2.0), W3C recommendation, August 2001. http://www.w3.org/TR/smil20/