A prospect theory analysis of California's initiatives in implementation of its zero emission vehicles (ZEV) Mandate

Review of Policy Research

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 157-169

  Majumdar, Sarmistha R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMISSION CONTROL; TRAFFIC EMISSION;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

EID: 17444421151     PISSN: 1541132X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2005.00127.x     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Air Resources Board. (2001a). A report on outreach and public education for zero emission vehicles, attachment 1. Sacramento, CA.
2. Air Resources Board. (2001b). A report on outreach and public education for zero emission vehicles, attachment 2. Sacramento, CA.
3. Air Resources Board. (2004). Information accessed at www.arb.ca.gov/ msprog/macs/mac0401/mac0401.pdf
4. California Air Resources Board. (2004). California's zero emission vehicle program-2003 fact sheet. Retrieved September 19, 2003, from http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/zevprog.
5. California ZEV Alliance Report. (2000). Drivers of zero-emission vehicles gain HOV lane. Media materials. Retrieved July 1, 2000, from http://www.zevnow.org.
6. Energy Policy Act of 1992. Retrieved January 22, 2005, from http:// www.eere.energy/gov/vehicles and fuels/epact.
7. Etzioni, A. (1967). Mixed scanning: A third approach to decision-making. Public Administration Review, 385, 27, 392.
8. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1325-1348.
9. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193-206.
10. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
11. Levy, J. (1996). An introduction to prospect theory. In B. Farnham (Ed.). Avoiding losses/Taking risks (pp. 7-22). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
12. Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19, 78-88.
13. Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14. Press Release. (2002). Governor Davis signs historic global warming bill. Retrieved July 24, 2002, from http://www.governor.ca.gov/state/ govsite/gov_htmlprint.
15. Sharpless, J. (2000, August 7). Op-cd, the Sacramento Bee.
16. Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39-60.
17. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 3-22). New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. ZEV Outreach Plan. (2001). A report on public outreach and public education for zero emission vehicles, prepared for California's Air Resources Board.