Plan Execution for Autonomous Spacecraft

AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn FS-96-01, Issue , 1996, Pages 109-116

  Pell, Barney ^a   Gat, Erann ^b   Keesing, Ron ^a   Muscettola, Nicola ^a   Smith, Ben ^b  

^a NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMOUS SPACECRAFT; CLOSED-LOOP; CONCURRENT EXECUTION; LONG TERM PLANNING; MULTI-STAGES; PLAN EXECUTION; REAL- TIME; RESOURCECONSTRAINT;

EID: 17444409226     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Bonasso, R. P.; Kortenkamp, D.; Miller, D.; and Slack, M. 1996. Experiences with an architecture for intelligent, reactive agents. JETALto appear.
2. Bresina, John; Edgington, Will; Swanson, Keith; and Drummond, Mark 1996. Operational closed-loop obesrvation scheduling and execution. In Pryor (Pryor 1996b).
3. Currie, K. and Tate, A. 1991. O-plan: the open planning architecture. Artificial Intelligence 52(1):49-86.
4. Draper, D.; Hanks, S.; and Weld, D. 1994. Probabilistic planning with information gathering and contingent execution. In Proceedings of AIPS94. AAAIPress. 31-36.
5. Drummond, M.; Bresina, J.; and Swanson, K. 1994. Just-in-case scheduling. In Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge, Mass. AAAI, AAAI/MIT Press. 1098-1104.
6. Gat, Erann 1992. Integrating planning and reacting in a heterogeneous asynchronous architecture for controlling real-world mobile robots. In Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge, Mass. AAAI, AAAI/MITPress.
7. Gat, Erann 1996. ESL: A language for supporting robust plan execution in embedded autonomous agents. In Pryor (Pryor 1996b).
8. Hayes-Roth, Barbara 1995. An architecture for adaptive intelligent systems. Artificial Intelligence 72.
9. Levinson, Richard 1994. A general programming language for unified planning and control. Artificial Intelligence. Special Issue on Planning and Scheduling.
10. Musliner, David; Durfee, Ed; and Shin, Kang 1993. Circa: A cooperative, intelligent, real-time control architecture. IEEETransactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 23(6).
11. Ogasawara, Gary H. 1991. Adistributed, decision-theoretic control system for a mobile robot. A CM SIGARTBulletin 2(4):140-145.
12. Pell, Barney; Bernard, Douglas E.; Chien, Steve A.; Gat, Erann; Muscettola, Nicola; Nayak, P. Pandurang; Wagner, Michael D.; and Williams, Brian C. 1996. A remote agent prototype for spacecraft autonomy. In Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Optical Science, Engineering, and Instrumentation.
13. Pryor, Louise 1996a. Opportunity recognition in complexenvironments. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conferenceon Artificial Intelligence, Portland. AAAI, AAAIPress/MIT Press. 1147-1152.
14. Pryor, Louise, editor 1996b. Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Plan Execution. AAAI Press.
15. Simmons, Reid 1990. An architecture for coordinating planning, sensing, and action. In Proceedings DARPAWorkshop on Innovative Approaches to Planning, Scheduling and Control. Morgan Kanfmann: San Mateo, CA. 292-297.
16. Tambe, M.; Johnson, W. Lewis; Jones, R. M.; Koss, F.; Laird, J. E.; Rosenbloom, Paul S.; and Schwamb, K. 1995. Intelligent agents for interactive simulation environments. AI Magazine 16(1):15-39.
17. Wilkins, David E. and Myers, Karen L. 1995. A commonknowledge representation for plan generation and reactive execution. Journal of Logic and Computation.
18. Wilkins, D. E.; Myers, K. L.; Lowrance, J. D.; and Wesley, L. P. 1995. Planning and reacting in uncertain and dynamic environments. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical AI 7(1):197-227.
19. Williams, Brian C. and Nayak, P. Pandurang 1996. A model-based approach to reactive self-configuring systems. In Proceedings of AAAI96. 971-978.