Adapting testing technology to serve accountability aims: The case of vertically moderated standard setting

Applied Measurement in Education

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 1-9

  Cizek, Gregory J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17444400462     PISSN: 08957347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15324818ame1801_1     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Angoff, W. A. (1971). Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement (2nd ed., pp. 508-600). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
2. Cizek, G. J. (2001a). Conjectures on the rise and call of standard setting: An introduction to context and practice. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 3-18). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3. Cizek, G. J. (2001b). More unintended consequences of high-stakes testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(4), 19-27.
4. Cizek, G. J., Kenney, P. A., Kolen, M. J., Peters, C. & van der Linden, W. J. (1999). An investigation of the feasibility of linking scores on the proposed Voluntary National Tests and the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: National Assessment Governing Board.
5. Lissitz, R. W., & Huynh, H. (2003). Vertical equating for state assessments: Issues and solutions in determination of adequate yearly progress and school accountability. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(10). Retrieved August 5, 2004 from http://www.pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v= 8&n=10
6. Madaus, G. F. (1988). The influence of testing on the curriculum. In L. N. Tanner (Ed.), Critical issues in the curriculum: Eighty-seventh yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 83-121). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Mitzel, H. C., Lewis, D. M., Patz, R. J., & Green, D. R. (2001). The Bookmark procedure: Psychological perspectives. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 249-282). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
8. National Research Council. (1998). Uncommon measures: Equivalence and linkage among educational tests. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
9. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Pub. L. 107-110, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 (2002).