"Residual change" analysis is not equivalent to analysis of covariance (multiple letters)

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 58, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 540-541

  Forbes, Andrew B ^a   Carlin, John B ^b,c   Twisk, Jos ^d   Proper, Karin ^d  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c ROYAL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^d VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FOLLOW UP; LETTER; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEASUREMENT; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 17444400111     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.12.002     Document Type: Letter

References (7)

1. J. Twisk K. Proper Evaluation of the results of a randomized controlled trial: how to define changes between baseline and follow-up J Clin Epidemiol 57 2004 223 228
2. A. Vickers D. Altman Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow-up measurements Br Med J 323 2001 1123 1124
3. S. Maxwell H. Delaney J. Manheimer ANOVA of residuals and ANCOVA: correcting an illusion by using model comparisons and graphs J Educ Stat 10 1985 197 209
4. C. Werts R. Linn A general linear model for studying growth Psychol Bull 73 1970 17 22
5. R. Smith Statistics of sexual size dimorphism J Hum Evol 36 1999 423 459
6. S. Selvin Practical biostatistical methods 1995 Duxbury Press Belmont
7. S. Senn Covariate imbalance and random allocation in clinical trials Stat Med 8 1989 467 475