Economic threshold as a criterion for management decision of concurrent rice genotypes in flooded rice;Dano econômico como critério na decisão sobre manejo de genótipos de arroz concorrentes em arroz irrigado

Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 1-9

  Agostinetto, Dirceu ^a   Fleck, Nilson Gilberto ^a   Rizzardi, Mauro Antonio ^a   Balbinot Jr , Alvadi Antonio ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Economic analysis; Interference; Mathematical models; Oryza sativa

Indexed keywords

ORYZA RUFIPOGON; ORYZA SATIVA;

EID: 17444400109     PISSN: 0100204X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2005000100001     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. AGOSTINETTO, D.; FLECK, N.G.; RIZZARDI, M.A.; VIDAL, R.A.; MEROTTO JUNIOR, A. Arroz-vermelho: ecofisiologia e manejo. Ciência Rural, v.31, p.341-349, 2001.
2. BAUER, T.A.; MORTENSEN, D.A. A comparison of economic and economic optimum thresholds for two annual weeds in soybeans. Weed Technology, v.6, p.228-235, 1992.
3. BECKETT, T.H.; STOLLER, E.W.; WAX, L.M. Interference of four annual weeds in corn (Zea mays). Weed Science, v.36, p.764-769, 1988.
4. CARDINA, J.; REGNIER, E.; SPARROW, D. Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) competition and economic thresholds in conventional and no-tillage corn (Zea mays). Weed Science, v.43, p.81-87, 1995.
5. COBLE, H.D.; MORTENSEN, D.A. The threshold concept and its application to Weed Science. Weed Technology, v.6, p.191-195, 1992.
6. COUSENS, R. An empirical model relating crop yield to weed and crop density and a statistical comparison with other models. Journal of Agricultural Science, v.105, p.513-521, 1985.
7. DIELEMAN, A.; HAMILL, A.S.; FOX, G.C.; SWANTON, C.J. Decision rules for postemergence control of pigweed (Amaranthus spp.) in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Science, v.44, p.126-132, 1996.
8. EMBRAPA CLIMA TEMPERADO. Arroz irrigado: recomendações técnicas da pesquisa para o Sul do Brasil. Pelotas: Embrapa Clima Temperado; Irga; Epagri, 1999. 124p. (Documento, 57).
9. IRGA. Arroz irrigado no RS: área, produção e rendimento. Disponível em: 〈http://www.irga.rs.gov.br〉 Acesso em 5 out. 2002.
10. KNEZEVIC, S.Z.; HORAK, M.J.; VANDERLIP, R.L. Relative time of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) emergence is critical in pigweed-sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] competition. Weed Science, v.45, p.502-508, 1997.
11. KROPFF, M.J.; SPITTERS, C.J.T. A simple model of crop loss by weed competition from early observations on relative leaf area of weeds. Weed Research, v.31, p.97-105, 1991.
12. LINDQUIST, J.L.; KROPFF, M.J. Applications of an ecophysiologjcal model for irrigated rice (Oryza sativa) - Echinochloa competition. Weed Science, v.44, p.52-56, 1996.
13. LINDQUIST, J.L.; MORTENSEN, D.A.: CLAY. S.A.: SCHMENK. R.; KELLS, J.J.; HOWATT, K.; WESTRA. P. Stability of corn (Zea mays) velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference relationships. Weed Science, v.44, p.309-313, 1996.
14. McDONALD, A.J.; RIHA, S.J. Model of crop:weed competition applied to maize: Abutilon theophrasti interactions: II. Assessing the impact of climate: implications for economic thresholds. Weed Research, v.39, p.371-381, 1999.
15. MENEZES, V.G.; SILVA, P.R.F. da. Manejo de arroz-vermelho através do tipo e arranjo de plantas em arroz irrigado. Planta Daninha. v.16, p.45-58, 1998.
16. NORRIS, R.F. Case history for weed competition/population ecology: barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris). Weed Technology, v.6, p.220-227, 1992.
17. OLIVER, L.R. Principles of weed threshold research. Weed Technology, v.2, p.398-403, 1988.
18. ONOFRI, A.; TEI, F. Competitive ability and threshold levels of three broadleaf weed species in sunflower. Weed Research, v.34, p.471-479, 1994.
19. PAOLINI, R.; DEL PUGLIA, S.; PRINCIPI, M.; BARCELLONA, O.: RICCARDI, E. Competition between safflower and weeds as influenced by crop genotype and sowing time. Weed Research, v.38. p.247-255. 1998.
20. RATKOWSKY. D.A. Nonlinear regression modeling: a unified practical approach. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1983. p.135-154.
21. RIZZARDI, M.A.; FLECK, N.G.; RIBOLDI, J.; AGOSTINETTO, D. Ajuste de modelo para quantificar o efeito de plantas daninhas e época de semeadura no rendimento de soja. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v.38, p.35-43, 2003.
22. SAS INSTITUTE (Cary, Estados Unidos). User's guide: version 6.4. Cary, 1989. 846p.
23. SMITH JUNIOR, R.J. Red rice control. Agribusiness Worldwide, Sept./Oct., p.18-23, 1992.
24. SWINTON, S.M.; BUHLER, D.D.; FORCELLA, F.; GUNSOLUS, J.L.: KING, R.P. Estimation of crop yield loss due to interference by multiple weed species. Weed Science, v.42, p.103-109, 1994.
25. VAN DEVENDER, K.W.; COSTELLO, T.A.; SMITH JUNIOR, R.J. Model of rice (Oryza sativa) yield reduction as a function of weed interference. Weed Science, v.45, p.218-224, 1997.