High strain rate responses and failure analysis in polymer matrix composites - An experimental and finite element study

Journal of Composite Materials

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 423-450

  Haque, A ^a   Ali, M ^b  

^a Box 870280   (United States)

^b FORD MOTOR COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DYNAMIC LOADS; ELASTIC MODULI; ESTERS; FAILURE ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; STRAIN RATE; STRESS ANALYSIS;

HIGH STRAIN RATES (HSR); MICROSTRUCTURAL DAMAGES; POLYMER MATRIX COMPOSITES (PMC); STRESS-STRAIN RESPONSES;

COMPOSITE MATERIALS;

EID: 17444400079     PISSN: 00219983     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0021998305047094     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Harding, J. (1987). Materials at High Strain Rates, In: Blazynski, T. Z. (ed.), Elsevier Applied Science, London and New York, pp. 133.
2. Stabb, G.H. and Gilat, A. (1995). Journal of Composite Materials, 29(10): 1308-1320.
3. Sierakowski, Robert L. (1995). Strain Rate Behavior of Composite: Issues, In: High Strain rate Effects on Polymer, Metal and Ceramic Matrix Composites and Other Advanced Materials, Vol. 48, ASME.
4. Daniel, I.M., Hamilton, W.G. and Labedz, R.H. (1982). Testing and Design, (Sixth Conference), ASTM STP 787, In: Daniel, I. M. (ed.), American Society for Testing and Materials, pp. 393-413.
5. Chiem, C.Y. and Lee, W.S. (1994). Materials Science and Engineering, 186: 43-50.
6. Newill, J.F. and Vinson, J.R. (1993). Some High Strain Rate Effects on Composite Materials, In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM) Madrid, 12-16, July, pp. 269-277.
7. El-Habak, A.M. (1990). Compressive Resistance of Unidirectional GFRP Under High Strain Rate of Loading, Journal of Composites Technology and Research, 15: 11-17.
8. Espinosa, H.D., Emore, G. and Xu, Y. (1995). High Strain Rate Behavior of Composites with Continuous Fibers, In: High Strain Rate Effects on Polymer, Metal and Ceramic Matrix Composites and Other Advanced Materials, AD-Vol. 48, ASME 1995.
9. Takeda, N. and Wan, L. (1995). Impact Compression Damage Evolution in Unidirectional Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites, In: High Strain Rate Effects on Polymer, Metal and Ceramic Matrix Composites and other Advanced Materials, Ad-Vol. 48, pp. 109-113 ASME 1995.
10. Weeks, A.C. and Sun, C.T. (1995). Nonlinear Rate Dependent Response of Thick-Section Composite Laminates, Ad-Vol. 48, In: High Strain Rate Effects on Polymer, Metal and Ceramic Matrix Composites and other Advanced Materials, ASME 1995, pp. 81-85
11. Zukas, J.A. (1995). Numerical Modeling of High Velocity Impact in Non-metallic Materials, Ad-Vol. 48, In: High Strain Rate Effects on Polymer, Metal and Ceramic Matrix Composites and other Advanced Materials, pp. 49-62, ASME 1995.
12. Dandekar, D.P., Green, J.L. and Beaulieu, P. (December 1990). Dynamic Characterization, In: Dynamic Response of S2 Glass Reinforced Plastic Structural Armor-A Progress Report, ARL-SR-5, pp. 09-62, Army Research Laboratory.
13. Harding, J. (1993). Effect of Strain Rate and Specimen Geometry on the Compressive Strength of Woven Glass-Reinforced Epoxy Laminates, Composites, 24(4): 323-332.
14. Karbhari, V.M. (1995). Progressive Crush Response of Multi-Element Foam-Filled Preform RTM Structures, I: Architecture and Rate Effects, Journal of Composite Materials, 29(6): 734-749.
15. Haque, A., Vaidya, U.K., Mahfuz, H. and Jeelani, S. (1996). Effects of Fiber Orientations On High Strain Rate Behavior of Glass/Epoxy Composites, In: 28th International SAMPE Technical Conference, Nov. 4-7.
16. Pintado, P. (1993). Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Composite Materials, (ICCM) Madrid, 12-16 July, pp. 438-444.
17. Monib, A. Gillespie. Jr, J.W. and Fink, B.K., 1999. Damage Tolerance of Thick Section Composites Subjected to Ballistic Impact. CCM Report, No. 99-08, University of Delaware.
18. Haque, A. and Hossain, M.K. (2003). Effects of Moisture and Temperature on High Strain Rate Behavior of S2-Glass/Vinyl Ester Woven Composites, Journal of Composite Materials, 37(7).
19. Gama, B.A., Gillespie Jr., J.W. et.al (2001). High Strain-Rate Behavior of Plain-Weave S2-Glass-Vinyl Ester Composites, Journal of Composite Materials, 35(13): 1201-1226.
20. Davies, E.D.H. and Hunter S.C. (1963). The Dynamic Compression Testing of Solids by the Method of the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar, J. Mech. of the Solids, 11: 155-179.
21. Lindholm, U.S. (1964). Some Experiments with the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar, J. Mech. and Phys. Of Solids, 12: 317-335.
22. Hauser, F.E. (1966). Technique for Measuring Stress-strain Relations at High Strain Rates, Experimental Mechanics, 6(8): 395-402.
23. Meyers, M. C. (1995). Dynamic Behavior of Materials, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
24. Nasser, S. N., Dynamic Deformation and Failure, In: Meyers, M.A., Murr L.E. and Staudhammer, K.P. (eds), Shock-Wave and High Strain Rate Phenomena in Materials, pp. 3-11, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.
25. Nasser, S.N., Isaacs, J.B. and Starrett, J.E. (1991). Hopkinson Techniques for Dynamic Recovery Experiments, Proc. R. Soc. London, 435A: 371-387.
26. Issacs, J. (1996). Program HBTuskegee.
27. ANSYS Finite Element Analysis, Theory Manual.
28. Garry III T George (2000). Classic Split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing, ASM handbook, Vol. 8, Mechanical Testing and Evaluation, ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio 44073-0002, pp. 462-476.