Interagent ties in team-based computational configuration design

Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 135-152

  Olson, Jesse T ^a   Cagan, Jonathan ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Agents; Collaboration; Computational Synthesis; Configuration Design; Teams

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; PRODUCT DESIGN;

COMPUTATIONAL CAPACITY; COMPUTATIONAL SYNTHESIS; COMPUTATIONAL TEAMING; CONFIGURATION DESIGN;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 17444395511     PISSN: 08900604     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0890060404040107     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Antonsson, E.K., & Cagan, J., Eds. (2001). Formal Engineering Design Synthesis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bar-Yam, Y. (1997). Dynamics of Complex Systems. Boston: Perseus Books.
3. Bar-Yam, Y. (2001). Introducing Complex Systems. Boston: NECSI Press.
4. Campbell, M.I., Cagan, J., & Kotovsky, K. (1999). A-design: An agent-based approach to conceptual design in a dynamic environment. Research in Engineering Design 11, 172-192.
5. Campbell, M.I., Cagan, J., & Kotovsky, K. (2000). Agent-based synthesis of electromechanical design configurations. Journal of Mechanical Design 722, 61-69.
6. Campbell, M.I., Cagan, J., & Kotovsky, K. (2003). The A-design approach to managing automated design synthesis. Research in Engineering Design 15.
7. Carley, K. (2001a). Computational organizational science: A new frontier. Paper presented at the NAS Sackler Colloquium.
8. Carley, K. (2001b). Smart Agents and Organizations of the Future. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
9. Carley, K. (2003). Intra-organizational computation and complexity. Working Paper, Carnegie Mellon University. Available on-line at www.heinz.cmu.edu/wpapers/retrievePDF?id=2000-15
10. Carley, K., & Hill, V. (2001). Structural change and learning within organizations. In Dynamics of Organizations: Computational Modeling and Organizational Theories (Lomi, A., Eds.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/AAAI Press/Live Oak.
11. Carley, K., Kjaer-Hansen, J., Newell, A., & Prietula, M. (1992). Pluralsoar: A prolegomenon to artificial agents and organizational behavior. In Artificial Intelligence in Organization and Management Theory: Models of Distributed Activity (Michael, M., & Warglien, M., Eds.), pp. 87-118. New York: North-Holland.
12. Carley, K.M., & Gasser, L. (1999). Computational organization theory. In Distributed Artificial Intelligence (Weiss, G., Eds.), Chap. 7. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Deshpande, S., & Cagan, J. (2003). An agent based optimization approach to manufacturing process planning. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design.
14. Fischer, C.E., Gunasekera, J., & Malas, J.C. (1997). Process model development for optimization of forged disk manufacturing processes. In Steel Forging: ASTM STP 1259 (Nisbett, E.G., & Meiilli, A.S., Eds.), Vol. 2. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
15. Gunasekera, J.S., Fischer, C.E., Malas, J.C., Mullins, W.M., & Yang, M.S. (1996). Development of process models for use with global optimization of a manufacturing system. Proc. ASME Symp. Modeling, Simulation and Control of Metal Processing. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress, Atlanta, GA, November.
16. Hustin, S., & Sangiovanni-Vicentelli, A. (1987). TIM, a new standard cell placement program based on the simulated annealing algorithm. IEEE Physical Design Workshop on Placement and Floorplanning, Hilton Head, SC, April.
17. Rich, E. (1983). Artificial Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. Wholey, D., Kiesler, S., & Carley, K. (1995). Learning Teamwork: Emergence of Communication and Structure in Novice Software Development Teams. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.