Hamiota, a new genus of freshwater mussel (Bivalvia: Unionidae) from the Gulf of Mexico drainages of the southeastern United States

Nautilus

Volumn 119, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 1-10

  Roe, Kevin J ^a   Hartfield, Paul D ^b  

^a Delaware Museum of Natural History   (United States)

^b US Fish and Wildlife Service   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIVALVIA; LAMPSILIS; LIGUMIA; PISCES; UNIONIDAE; VILLOSA;

EID: 17444386025     PISSN: 00281344     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Blalock-Herod, H. N., J. J. Herod and J. D. Williams. 2002. Evaluation of conservation status, distribution, and reproductive characteristics of an endemic Gulf Coast freshwater mussel, Lampsilis australis (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Biodiversity and Conservation 11: 1877-1887.
2. Brim Box, J. and J. D. Williams. 2000. Unionid mollusks of the Apalachicola basin in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. Bulletin of the Alabama Museum of Natural History 21: 1-143.
3. Burch, J. B. 1975. Freshwater Unionacean clams (Mollusca: Pelecypoda) of North America. Malacological Publications, Hamburg [Michigan], 204 pp.
4. ère série, vol. 3. A. Franck, Paris, 153 pp., 34 pls.
5. Clench, W. J. and R. D. Turner. 1956. Freshwater mollusks of Alabama, Georgia, and Florida from the Escambia to the Suwannee River. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum 1: 97-239.
6. Conrad, T. A. 1834. New fresh water shells of the United States, with coloured illustrations; and a monograph of the genus Anculotus of Say; also a synopsis of the American naiads. Judah Dobson, Philadelphia, 76 pp. + 8 plates.
7. Frierson, L. S. 1927. A classified and annotated check list of the North American naiads. Baylor University Press, Waco, 111 pp.
8. Fuller, S. L. H. and D. J. Bereza. 1973. Recent additions to the naiad fauna of the eastern Gulf Drainage (Bivalvia: Unionoida: Unionidae). Association of Southeastern Biologists Bulletin 20: 53.
9. Haag, W. R., R. S. Butler and P. D. Hartfield. 1995. An extraordinary reproductive strategy in freshwater bivalves: prey mimicry to facilitate larval dispersal. Freshwater Biology 34: 471-476.
10. Haag, W. R. and M. L. Warren. 1999. Mantle displays of freshwater mussels elicit attacks from fish. Freshwater Biology 42: 35-40.
11. Haag, W. R., M. L. Warren and M. Shillingsford. 1999. Host fishes and host attracting behavior of Lampsilis altilis and Villosa vibex (Bivalvia: Unionidae). American Midland Naturalist 141: 149-157.
12. Haas, F. 1969. Superfamilia Unionacea. Das Tierreich (Berlin) 88: x + 663 pp.
13. Hartfield, P. and R. Butler. 1997. Observations on the release of superconglutinates by Lampsilis perovalis (Conrad 1834). In: Cummings, K. S., A. C. Buchanan, C. A. Mayer, and T. J. Naimo (eds.) Conservation and management of freshwater mussels II: Initiatives for the future. Proceedings of a UMRCC symposium, 16-18 October 1995, St. Louis, Missouri. Upper Mississippi Conservation Committee, Rock Island, Illinois, pp. 11-14.
14. Heard, W. H. 1979. Identification manual of the freshwater clams of Florida. State of Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, Technical Series, vol.4, no. 2, 83 pp.
15. Heard, W. H. and R. H. Guckert. 1970. A re-evaluation of the recent Unionacea (Pelycepoda) of North America. Malacologia 10: 333-355.
16. Hubbs, C. L. and R. M. Bailey. 1940. A revision of the black basses (Micropterus and Huro) with descriptions of four new forms. Miscellaneous Publications Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 48: 1-51.
17. Hurd, J. C. 1974. Systematics and zoogeography of the Unionacean mollusks of the Coosa River Drainage of Alabama, Georgia and Tennessee. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Auburn University.
18. Johnson, R. I. and H. B. Baker. 1973. The types of Unionacea (Mollusca: Bivalvia) in the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 125: 145-186, pls. 1-10.
19. nd ed.
20. Lacepéde, B. G. E. 1802. Histoire naturelle des Poissons, vol. 4.
21. Lea, I. 1836. A Synopsis of the family of Naïades. Carey, Lea, and Blanchard, Philadelphia, 59 pp., 1 pl.
22. Lea, I. 1840. Descriptions of new freshwater and land shells. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society of Philadelphia 1: 284-289.
23. Lea, I. 1842a. Description of new freshwater and land shells. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 8[new series]: 163-250, pls. 5-27.
24. Lea, I. 1842b. Observations on the genus Unio, together with descriptions of new species in the families Naïades, Colimacea, Lymnaeana, Melaniana and Peristomiana. 3: 1-88, pls. 5-27.
25. Lea, I. 1852a. A synopsis of the family of Naïades. Philadelphia. 3rd edition, Blanchard and Lea, Philadelphia, 88 pp.
26. Lea, I. 1852b. Descriptions of new species of the family Unionidae. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society of Philadelphia 5: 251-252.
27. Lea, I. 1852c. Descriptions of new species of the family Unionidae. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 10[New Series]: 253-294, pls. 12-29.
28. Lea, I. 1852d. Observations on the genus Unio, together with descriptions of new species in the families Unionidae, Colimacea and Melaniana 5: 9-61, pls. 30.
29. Lea, I. 1861. Descriptions of twenty-five new species of Unionidae from Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee and Florida. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 13: 38-41.
30. Lea, I. 1862a. Descriptions of ten new species of Unionidae from the United States. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 14: 168-169.
31. Lea, I. 1862b. New Unionidae of the United States and arctic America. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 5[New Series]: 187-216, pls. 24-33.
32. Lea, I. 1862c. Observations on the genus Unio, together with descriptions of new species, their soft parts, and embryonic forms, in the family Unionidae, and descriptions of new genera and species of the Melanidae. 9: 9-178, pls. 24-38.
33. Lea, I. 1862d. New Unionidae of the United States. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 5 [New Series]: 14-109, pls. 1-18.
34. Lea, I. 1862e. Observations on the genus Unio, together with descriptions of new species, their soft parts, and embryonic forms, in the family Unionidae. 8: 9-114, 34 pls.
35. Lea, I. 1865. Descriptions of eight new species of Unio from the United States. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 17: 88-89.
36. Lea, I. 1868. New Unionidae, Melanidae, etc., chiefly of the United States. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 6 [New Series]: 249-302, pls. 29-45.
37. Lea, I. 1869. Observations on the genus Unio, together with descriptions of new species in the family Unionidae, and descriptions of new species of the Melanidae and Paludinae. 12: 9-105, 26 pls.
38. Lea, I. 1870. A synopsis of the family of Naïades. Philadelphia, 4th edition, H. C. Lea, Philadelphia, 184 pp.
39. O'Brien, C. and J. Brim Box. 1999. Reproductive biology and juvenile recruitment of the Shinyrayed Pocketbook, Lampsilis subangulata (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in the Gulf Coastal Plain. American Midland Naturalist 142: 129-140.
40. Parmalee, P. W. and A. E. Bogan. 1998. The Freshwater Mussels of Tennessee. The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, 328 pp.
41. Rafinesque, C. S. 1819. Prodrome de 70 nouveaux generes d'animaux découverts dans l'intérieur des Etats-Unis d'Amérique, Durant l'année 1818. Journal de Physique, de Chimie, d'Histoire Naturelle, et des Arts, Paris 88: 417-429.
42. Rafinesque, C. S. 1820. Monographie des coquilles bivalves fluviatiles de la Rivière Ohio, contenant douze generes et soixante-huit espèces. Annales générales des sciences Physiques, a Bruxelles 5: 287-322.
43. Reeve, L. 1865-1868. Monograph of the genus Unio. Conchologica Iconica. L. Reeve and Co., London.
44. Roe, K. J., P. D. Hartfield and C. Lydeard. 2001. Phylogeographic analysis of the threatened and endangered superconglutinate-producing mussels of the genus Lampsilis (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Molecular Ecology 10: 2225-2234.
45. Simpson, C. T. 1892. Notes on the Unionidae of Florida and the southeastern United States. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 15: 405-436, pls. 49-74.
46. Simpson, C. T. 1900a. Synopsis of the naiads or pearly freshwater mussels. Proceedings of U.S. National Museum 22: 501-1044.
47. Simpson, C. T. 1900b. New and unfigured Unionidae. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 52: 74-86.
48. Swainson, W. 1840. A treatise on malacology or the natural classification of shells and shell-fish. London, 419 pp.
49. nd edition. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland, 526 pp.
50. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1994. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants, 50 CFR 17.11 and 17.12. Division of Endangered Species, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.
51. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1998. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants, Determination of endangered status for five freshwater mussels and threatened status for two freshwater mussels from eastern Gulf slope drainages of Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. Federal Register 63: 12664-12687.
52. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; proposed designation of critical habitat for three threatened mussels and eight endangered mussels in the Mobile River Basin; proposed rule. Federal Register 68: 14752-14832.
53. van der Schalie, H. 1934. Lampsilis jonesi, a new naiad from southeastern Alabama. The Nautilus 47: 125-127.
54. von Ihering, H. 1901. The Unionidae of North America. The Nautilus 15: 37-39, 50-53.
55. Wright, S. H. 1897. Contribution to the knowledge of the United States Unionidae. The Nautilus 10: 136-139.