Image-based rendering using image-based priors

International Journal of Computer Vision

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 141-151

  Fitzgibbon, Andrew ^a   Wexler, Yonatan ^b   Zisserman, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

Image based rendering; New view synthesis

Indexed keywords

CAMERAS; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERPOLATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STATISTICS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

IMAGE-BASED PRIORS; IMAGE-BASED RENDERING; NEW VIEW SYNTHESIS; STEREO CONSTRUCTION;

IMAGE ANALYSIS;

EID: 17444366593     PISSN: 09205691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-005-6643-9     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. 2d3 Ltd. http://www.2d3.com, 2002.
2. Besag, J. 1986. On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures. J. Royal Stat. Soc. B, 48(3):259-302.
3. Broadhurst, A. and Cipolla, R. 2001. A statistical consistency check for the space carving algorithm. In Proc. ICCV.
4. Debevec, P.E., Taylor, C.J., and Malik, J. 1996. Modeling and rendering architecture from photographs: A hybrid geometry- and image-based approach. In Proceedings, ACM SIGGRAPH, pp. 11-20.
5. Efros, A. and Leung, T. 1999. Texture synthesis by non-parametric sampling. In Proc. ICCV, pp. 1039-1046.
6. Freeman, W. and Pasztor, E. 1999, Learning low-level vision. In ICCV, pp. 1182-1189.
7. Gortler, S.J., Grzeszczuk, R., Szeliski, R., and Cohen, M.F. 1996. The lumigraph. In SIG-GRAPH96.
8. Grenander, U. and Srivastava, A. 2001. Probability models for clutter in natural images. IEEE PAMI, 23(4):424-429.
9. Huang, J. and Mumford, D. 1999. Statistics of natural images and models. In Proc. CVPR, pp. 1541-1547.
10. Irani, M., Hassner, T., and Anandan, P. 2002. What does the scene look like from a scene point? In Proc. ECCV.
11. Koch, R. 1995. 3D surface reconstruction from stereoscopic image sequences. In Proc. ICCV, pp. 109-114.
12. Koch, R., Heigl, B., and Pollefeys, Marc 2001. Image-based rendering from uncalibrated light-fields with scalable geometry. In G. Gimel'farb (Eds.) R. Klette, T. Huang, Multi-Image Analysis, Springer LNCS 2032, pp. 51-66.
13. Kutulakos, K. and Seitz, S. 1999. A theory of shape by space carving. In Proc. ICCV, pp. 307-314.
14. Levoy, M. and Hanrahan, P. 1996. Light field rendering. In SIGGRAPH96.
15. Matusik, W., Buehler, C., Raskar, R., McMillan, L., and Gortler, S. 2000. Image-based visual hulls. In Proc. ACMSIGGRAPH, pp. 369-374.
16. Matusik, W., Pfister, H., Beardsley, P.A., Ngan, A., Ziegler, R., and McMillan, L. 2002. Image-based 3d photography using opacity hulls. In Proc. ACMSIGGRAPH.
17. McMillan, L. and Bishop, G. 1995. Plenoptic modeling: An image-based rendering system. In SIGGRAPH95.
18. Rademacher, P. 1999. View-dependent geometry. In Proc. ACM. SIGGRAPH pp. 439-446.
19. Scharstein, D. 1999. View Synthesis Using Stereo Vision, Vol. 1583 of LNCS. Springer-Verlag.
20. Scharstein, D. and Szeliski, R. 2002. A taxonomy and evaluation of dense two-frame stereo correspondence algorithms. IJCV, 47(1):7-42.
21. Seitz, S.M. and Dyer, C.R. 1997. Photorealistic scene reconstruction by voxel coloring. In Proc. CVPR, pp. 1067-1073.
22. Sminchisescu, C. and Triggs, B. 2002. Building roadmaps of local minima of visual models. In Proc. ECCV, Vol. 1, pp. 566-582.
23. Srivastava, A., Lee, A., Simoncelli, E., and Zhu, S. 2003. On advances in statistical modeling of natural images, 18(1):17-33.
24. Szeliski, R. and Golland, P. 1998. Stereo matching with transparency and matting. In Proc. ICCV, pp. 517-524.
25. Wei, L.-Y. and Levoy, M. 2000. Fast texture synthesis using tree-structured vector quantization. In Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH, pp. 479-488.
26. Wexler, Y. and Chellappa, R. 2001. View synthesis using convex and visual hulls. In Proc. BMVC.