|
|
|
Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 30-36
|
|
Paternalistic or protective? Freedom of expression and direct-to-consumer drug advertising policy in Canada.
a
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
DRUG;
ADVERTIZING;
ARTICLE;
CANADA;
CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
CONSUMER;
DRUG INDUSTRY;
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
HEALTH CARE POLICY;
HUMAN;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
METHODOLOGY;
PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION;
TELEVISION;
CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
LEGAL APPROACH;
ADVERTISING;
CANADA;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
CONSUMER PARTICIPATION;
DRUG INDUSTRY;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HEALTH POLICY;
HUMANS;
MARKETING OF HEALTH SERVICES;
PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION;
PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS;
TELEVISION;
|
|
EID: 17444365060
PISSN: 11888725
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (4)
|
|
References (0)
|
