Response format and method of estimation effects on confirmatory factor analysis;Efectos de formato de respuesta y método de estimación en análisis factorial confirmatorio

Psicothema

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 197-208

  Tomás, José Manuel ^a   Oliver, Amparo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17344366815     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bagozzi, R. P. y Heatherton, T. F. (1994). A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self-esteem. Structural Equation Modeling, 1 (1), 35-67.
2. Bentler, P.M. (1989). EQS estritctural equation program manual. Los Angeles, BMDP Statistical Software.
3. Bernstein, I. H. y Eveland, D. (1982). State vs. trait anxiety: A case study in confirmatory factor analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 3, 361-372.
4. Bernstein, I. H. y Teng, G. (1989). Factoring items and factoring scales are different: spurious evidence for multidimensionality due to item categorization. Psychological Bulletin, 105, (3), 467-477.
5. Bock, R. D. (1972). Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories. Psychometrika, 37, 1,29-51.
6. Budesco, D. V. y Nevo, B. (1985). Optimal number of options: an investigation of the assumption of proportionality. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22, 3, 183-196.
7. Comrey, A. L. y Montag, I. (1982). Comparison of factor analytic results with two-choice and seven choice personality item formats. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 285-289.
8. Ferrando, P. J. (1995). Equivalencia entre los formatos Likert y continuo en ítems de personalidad: Un estudio empírico. Psicológica, 16, (3), 417-428.
9. Garner, W.R. (1960). Rating scales, discriminability, and information transmission. Psychological Review, 67, 343-352.
10. Garner, W. R. (1962). Uncertainity and structure as psychological concepts. New York, Wiley.
11. Gómez, J., Artés, M. y Deumal, E. (1989). Efecto del número de rangos de la escala de medida sobre la calibración de ítems y sujetos mediante credit. II Conferencia Española de Biometría, Segovia, Septiembre.
12. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (second edition). Hillsdale, New Jersey, Erlbaum.
13. Gregoire, T. G. y Driver, B. L. (1987). Analysis of ordinal data to detect population differences. Psychological Bulletin, 101, (1), 159165.
14. Grier, J. B. (1975). The number of alternatives for optimum test reliability. Journal of Educational Measurement, 12, 109-112.
15. Heatherton, T.F. y Polivy, J. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 895-910.
16. Jöreskog, K.G. y Sörbom, D. (1988). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago, SPSS.
17. King, L. A., King, D. W., y Klockars, A. J. (1983). Dichotomous and multipoint scales using bipolar adjectives. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 2, 173-180.
18. Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of Item Response Theory to practical testing problems. New Jersey, Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
19. Marsh, M.W. (1989). Confirmatory factor analysis of multitrait multimethod data: Many problems and a few solutions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 335-361.
20. Morales, P. (1988). Medición de actitudes en psicología y educatión. Constructión de escalas y problemas metodológicos. San Sebastián, Ttarttalo.
21. Oliver, A. y Tomás, J.M. (1994). Indices de ajuste absolutos e incrementales: comportamiento en Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio con muestras pequeñas. Psicológica, 15, (3).
22. Oswald, W. I. y Velicer, W. F. (1980). Item format and the structure of the Eysenck personality inventory: a replication. Journal of Personality Assessment, 44, (3), 283-288.
23. Rasmussen, J. L. (1989). Analysis of Likert-scale data: A reinterpretation of Gregoire and Driver. Psychological Bulletin, 105 (1), 167170.
24. Romero, E., Luengo, M. A. y Otero-López, J. M. (1994). La medición de la autoestima: una revisión. Psicologemas, 8, (15), 41-60.
25. Ruch, G. M. y Charles, J. W. (1928). A comparison of five types of objective tests in elementary psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 12, 398-404.
26. Ruch, G. M. y Stoddard, G. D. (1925). Comparative reliabilities of five types of objective examinations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 16, 89-103.
27. Ruch, G. M. y Stoddard, G. D. (1927). Tests and measurement in high school instruction. Chicago: World Book.
28. Russell, C. J. y Bobko, P. (1992). Moderated regression analysis and Likert scales: Too coarse for comfort. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, (3), 336-342.
29. Sancerni, M. D., Meliá, J. L. y González-Romá, V. (1990). Formato de respuesta, fiablidad y validez en la medición del conflicto de rol. Psicológica, 11, (2), 167-175.
30. Tomás, J. M., Oliver, A. y Pastor, A. (1996). Modelos confirmatorios y efectos de método en la medida de la autoestima. Boletín de Psicología, 51,33-44.
31. Toops, H. A. (1921). Trade tests in education. Teachers College Contributions to Education (n° 115). New York, Columbia University.
32. Tversky, A. ( 1964). On the optimal number of alternatives of a a choice point. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 386-391.
33. Vale, C. D. y Weiss, D. J. (1977). A comparison of information functions of multiple choice and free parameters vocabulary ítems. Research Report 77-2. Minneapolis: Psychometric Methods program, Departament of Psychology, University of Minnesotta.
34. Williams, B. J. y Ebel, R. L. (1957). The effect of varying the number of alternatives per item on multiple-choice vocabulary test ítems. The Fourteenth Yearbook. National Council on Measurements Used in Education.