Effect of genotype and overfeeding on lipid deposition in myofibres and intramuscular adipocytes of breast and thigh muscles of ducks

Reproduction Nutrition Development

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 87-99

  Chartrin, Pascal ^a   Schiavone, Achille ^b   Bernadet, Marie Dominique ^c   Guy, Gérard ^c   Mourot, Jacques ^c   Duclos, Michel J ^a   Baéza, Elizabeth ^a  

^a STATION DE RECHERCHES AVICOLES   (France)

^b Dipto Prod Anim Epidemiol/Ecol   (Italy)

^c CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Adipocytes; Ducks; Lipids; Muscles; Myofibres

Indexed keywords

LIPID; TRIACYLGLYCEROL;

ADIPOCYTE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; BREAST; CELL LEVEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS BREEDING; DUCK; GENOTYPE; HISTOLOGY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LEG MUSCLE; LIPID STORAGE; MALE; MUSCLE CELL; MUSCLE MASS; NONHUMAN; OVERNUTRITION; PECTORALIS MAJOR MUSCLE; REARING; SARTORIUS MUSCLE; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; THIGH; TISSUE TYPES; WEIGHT GAIN;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ANIMAL FEED; ANIMAL NUTRITION PHYSIOLOGY; ANIMALS; BODY COMPOSITION; BODY WEIGHT; DUCKS; ENERGY INTAKE; GENOTYPE; LIPID METABOLISM; MALE; MUSCLE DEVELOPMENT; MUSCLE FIBERS; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PECTORALIS MUSCLES; RANDOM ALLOCATION;

ANAS; ANAS PLATYRHYNCHOS; AVES; CAIRINA MOSCHATA;

EID: 17244382510     PISSN: 09265287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/rnd:2005006     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Moody WG, Cassens RG. A quantitative and morphological study of bovine longissimus fat cells. J Food Sci 1968, 33: 47-52.
2. Gondret F, Mourot J, Bonneau M. Comparison of intramuscular adipose tissue cellularity in muscles differing in their lipid content and fibre type composition during rabbit growth. Livest Prod Sci 1998, 54: 1-10.
3. Hood RL, Allen CE. Cellularity of bovine adipose tissue. J Lipid Res 1973, 14: 605-610.
4. Lee YB, Kauffman RG. I. Cellular and enzymatic changes with animal growth in porcine intramuscular adipose tissue. II. Cellularity and lipogenic enzyme activities of porcine intramuscular adipose tissue. J Anim Sci 1974, 38: 532-544.
5. Rabot C. Vitesse de croissance et caractŗistiques lipidiques et sensorielles des muscles de poulet. PhD thesis, INA PG, Paris, France 1998, p 156.
6. Guy G, Hermier D, Davail S, Bely M, André JM, Hoo-Paris R. Meat production and force feeding ability of different types of ducks. In: 1st World Waterfowl Conference, Taichung Taïwan, 1-4 December, 1999, p 462-468.
7. Hermier D, Guy G, Guillaumin S, Davail S, André JM, Hoo-Paris R. Differential channelling of liver lipids in relation to susceptibility to hepatic steatosis in two species of ducks. Comp Biochem Physiol Part B 2003, 135: 663-675.
8. Chartrin P, Mourot J, Bernadet MD, Guy G, Duclos MJ, Baéza E. Effect of genotype and forcefeeding on the intramuscular fat deposition in duck. In: XVIth European Symposium on the Quality of Poultry Meat, St Brieuc France, 23-26 September, 2003, p 224-230.
9. Baéza E, Marché G, Wacrenier N. Effect of sex on muscular development of Muscovy ducks. Reprod Nutr Dev 1999, 39: 675-682.
10. Guth L, Samaha FJ. Qualitative differences between actomyosin ATPase of slow and fast mammalian muscle. Exp Neurol 1969, 25: 138-152.
11. Ashmore CR, Doerr L. Postnatal development of fibre types in normal and dystrophic skeletal muscle of the chick. Exp Neurol 1971, 30: 331-346.
12. Torrella JR, Fouces V, Palomeque J, Viscor G. Capillarity and fibre types in locomotory muscles in wild Mallard ducks (Anas platyrhynchos). J Comp Physiol B 1996, 166: 164-177.
13. Buche P. Racine: un système d'analyse multiimages de coupes sériées. Application à la caractérisation de fibres musculaires. PhD thesis, Rennes I University, France, 1990, p 202.
14. Koopman R, Schaart G, Hesselink MKC. Optimisation of oil red O staining permits combination with immunofluorescence and automated quantification of lipids. Histochem Cell Biol 2001, 116: 63-68.
15. Dubowitz V. In: Muscle biopsy. A practical approach. WB Saunders Company LTD, London, Philadelphia, Toronto 1985, p 707-715.
16. Fernandez X, Meunier-Salaün MC, Ecolan P. Glycogen depletion according to muscle and fibre types in response to dyadic encounters in pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus)-relationships with plasma epinephrine and aggressive behaviour. Comp Biochem Physiol A 1994, 109: 869-879.
17. AS. In: SAS/STAT user's guide. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, 1989.
18. Auvergne A. Facteurs de variation de la composition corporelle et tissulaire des canards avant et après gavage. PhD thesis, INP Toulouse, France, 1992, p 252.
19. Babilé R. La production de foies gras de canards de Barbarie (Caïrina moschata): aspects génétiques, nutritionnels et technologiques. PhD thesis, INP Toulouse, France, 1989, p 315.
20. Zanusso J, Rm̧ignon H, Guy G, Manse H, Babilé R. The effects of overfeeding on myofibre characteristics and metabolical traits of the breast muscle in Muscovy ducks (Caïrina moschata). Reprod Nutr Dev 2003, 43: 105-115.
21. Rémignon H, Gardahaut MF, Marché G, Ricard FH. Selection for rapid growth increases the number and the size of muscles fibres without changing their typing in chickens. J Muscle Res Cell Motility 1995, 16: 95-102.
22. Baéza E, Dessay C, Wacrenier N, Marché G, Listrat A. Effect of selection for improved body weight and composition on muscle and meat characteristics in Muscovy ducks. Br Poult Sci 2002, 43: 560-568.
23. Maxwell LC, Enwemeka CS, Fernandes G. Effects of exercice and food restriction on rat skeletal muscles. Tissue Cell 1992, 24: 491-498.
24. Brandstetter AM, Picard B, Geay Y. Muscle fibre characteristics in four muscles of growing male cattle. II. Effect of castration and feeding level. Livest Prod Sci 1998, 53: 25-36.
25. Candek-Potokar M, Lefaucheur L, Zlender B, Bonneau M. Effect of slaughter weight and/or age on histochemical characteristics of pig longissimus dorsi muscle as related to meat quality. Meat Sci 1999, 52: 195-203.
26. Gondret F, Lebas F, Bonneau M. Restricted feed intake during fattening reduces intramuscular lipid deposition without modifying muscle fiber characteristics. J Nutr 2000, 130: 228-233.
27. Seideman SC, Crouse JD. The effects of sex condition, genotype and diet on bovine muscle fiber characteristics. Meat Sci 1986, 17: 55-72.
28. Solomon MB, Lynch GP. Biochemical, histological, and palatability characteristics of young ram lambs as affected by diet and electrical stimulation. J Anim Sci 1988, 66: 1955-1962.
29. Harrisson AP, Rowlerson AM, Dauncey MJ. Selective regulation of myofiber differentiation by energy status during postnatal development. Am J Physiol 1996, 270: R667-R674.
30. Ricard FH. Composition anatomique de la carcasse du canard mulard comparé aux deux types parentaux. In: Comptes rendus de la Conférence Avicole WPSA-SIMAVIP, Cahier no 3, 1986, p 47-64.
31. Gille U, Salomon FV, Kattein S. Post-hatching myofibre development in the M. pectoralis of white Pekin ducks. Anat Rec 1998, 250: 154-158.
32. Baéza E, Salichon MR, Marché G, Wacrenier N, Dominguez B, Culioli J. Effects of age and sex on the structural, chemical and technological characteristics of mule duck meat. Br Poult Sci 2000, 41: 300-307.
33. e Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, Pau (France), 9-10 October, 2002, p 29-32.