Personal paradigm shifts in PBS experts: Perceptions of treatment acceptability of decelerative consequence-based behavioral procedures

Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 93-108

  Michaels, Craig A ^a   Brown, Fredda ^a   Mirabella, Niki ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17244380456     PISSN: 10983007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/10983007050070020101     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. AAMD position statement on aversive therapy. (1987). Mental retardation, 25, 118.
2. American Psychological Association. (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
3. Butterfield, E. C. (1990). The compassion of distinguishing punishing behavioral treatment from aversive treatment. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 95, 137-141.
4. Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111-126.
5. Durand, V. M. (1990). Severe behavior problems: A functional communication training approach. New York: Guilford Press.
6. Eisner, E. W. (1992). Curriculum ideologies. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 302-326). New York: MacMillan.
7. Evans, I. M., Scotti, J. R., & Hawkins, R. P. (1999). Understanding where we are going by looking at where we have been. In J. R. Scotti & L. H. Meyer (Eds.), Behavioral intervention: Principles, models, and practices (pp. 3-23). Baltimore: Brookes.
8. Ferguson, D. L. (1987). Curriculum decision making for students with severe handicaps: Policy and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
9. Ferguson, D. L. (1995). The real challenge of inclusion: Confessions of a "rabid inclusionist." Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 281-287.
10. Guess, D., Helmstetter, E., Turnbull, H. R., III, & Knowlton, S. (1987). Use of aversive procedures with persons who are disabled: An historical review and critical analysis (Monograph No. 2). Seattle, WA: The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps.
11. Helms, B. J., & Moore, S. C. (1993). Perceptions of aversiveness by supported employment supervisors and job coaches. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 28, 212-219.
12. Horner, R. H., Albin, R. W., Sprague, J. R., & Todd, A. W. (2000). Positive behavior support. In M. E. Snell & F. Brown (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (5th ed., pp. 207-243). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
13. Horner, R. H., Dunlap, G., Koegel, R. L., Carr, E. G., Sailor, W., Anderson, J., et al. (1990). Toward a technology of "nonaversive" behavioral support. Journal of the Association of Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15, 125-132.
14. Jackson, L., & Panyan, M. V. (2002). Positive behavioral support in the classroom: Principles and practices. Baltimore: Brookes.
15. Johnson, J. C. (1990). Selecting ethnographic informants (Qualitative Research Methods Series, Vol. 22). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16. Kahng, S., Iwata, B. A., & Lewin, A. B. (2002). Behavioral treatment of self-injury, 1965 to 2000. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 107, 212-221.
17. Kazdin, A. E. (1980). Acceptability of alternative treatments for deviant child behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 259-273.
18. Keyes, J., Creekmore, W., Karst, R., Crow, R., & Dayan, M. (1988). The AAMR position statement on aversive therapy: The controversy. Mental Retardation, 26, 314-318.
19. Kincaid, D., Knoster, T., Harrower, J. K., Shannon, P., & Bustamante, S. (2002). Measuring the impact of positive behavior support. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4, 109-117.
20. Knoster, T., Anderson, J., Carr, E. G., Dunlap, G., & Horner, R. H. (2003). Emerging challenges and opportunities: Introducing the Association for Positive Behavior Support. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 5, 183-186.
21. Koegel, L. K., Koegel, R. L., & Dunlap, G. (Eds.). (1996). Positive behavior support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community. Baltimore: Brookes.
22. Lennox, D. B., & Miltenberger, R. G. (1990). On the conceptualization of treatment acceptability. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 25, 211-224.
23. Luiselli, J. K., & Cameron, M. J. (1998). Conclusions and future directions. In J. K. Luiselli & M. J. Cameron (Eds.), Antecedent control: Innovative approaches to behavioral support (pp. 373-379). Baltimore: Brookes.
24. Martin, G., & Pear, J. (1999). Behavior modification: What it is and how to do it (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Miltenberger, R. G., Lennox, D. B., & Erfanian, N. (1989). Acceptability of alternative treatments for persons with mental retardation: Ratings from institutional and community-based staff. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 93, 388-395.
27. Nevo, B. (1985). Face validity revisited. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22, 287-293.
28. Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Pickering, D., & Morgan, S. B. (1985). Parental ratings of treatments of self-injurious behavior. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 15, 303-314.
30. Reimers, T. M., & Wacker, D. P. (1988). Parents' ratings of behavioral treatment recommendations made in an outpatient clinic: A preliminary analysis of the influence of treatment effectiveness. Behavior Disorders, 14, 7-15.
31. Ricketts, R., Goza, A., & Matese, M. (1992). Case study: Effects of Naltrexone and SIBIS on self-injury. Behavioral Residential Treatment, 7, 315-326.
32. Scotti, J. R., & Kennedy, C. H. (2000). Introduction to issues in the application of functional assessment. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 25, 195-196.
33. Smith, F. A., & Linscheid, T. R. (1994). Effect of parental acceptance or rejection of a proposed aversive intervention on treatment acceptability. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 99, 262-269.
34. Spreat, S., & Walsh, D. E. (1994). Impact of treatment efficacy and professional affiliation on ratings of treatment acceptability. Mental Retardation, 32, 227-233.
35. SPSS, Inc. (2000). SPSS for Windows V 10.0. Chicago: Author.
36. Tarnowski, K. J., Mulick, J. A., & Rasnake, L. K. (1990). Acceptability of behavioral interventions for self-injurious behavior: Replication and inter-institutional comparison. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 95, 182-187.
37. Tarnowski, K. J., Rasnake, L. K., Mulick, J. A., & Kelly, P. A. (1989). Acceptability of behavioral interventions for self-inuuirous behavior. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 93, 575-580.
38. Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. New York: Falmer.
39. Williams, D. E., Kirkpatrick-Sanchez, S., & Iwata, B. A. (1993). A comparison of shock intensity in the treatment of longstanding and severe self-injurious behavior. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 14, 207-219.
40. Wolfensberger, W., Nirje, B., Olshansky, S., Perske, R., & Roos, P. (1972). The principle of normalization in human services. Toronto, Canada: National Institute on Mental Retardation.