Methodology in family science: Introduction to the special issue

Journal of Family Psychology

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 3-5

  Snyder, Douglas K ^a   Kazak, Anne E ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Family research; Methodology; Research methods

Indexed keywords

EID: 17244367635     PISSN: 08933200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.19.1.3     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Atkins, D. C. (2005). Using multilevel models to analyze couple and family treatment data: Basic and advanced issues. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 98-110.
2. Christensen, A., Baucom, D. H., Vu, C. T.-A., & Stanton, S. (2005). Methodologically sound, cost-effective research on the outcome of couple therapy. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 6-17.
3. Cook, W. L., & Snyder, D. K. (2005). Analyzing non-independent outcomes in couple therapy from the actor-partner interdependence model. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 133-141.
4. Fals-Stewart, W., Yates, B. T., & Klostermann, K. (2005). Assessing the costs, benefits, cost-benefit ratio, and cost-effectiveness of marital and family treatments: Why we should and how we can. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 28-39.
5. Fiese, B. H., & Spagnola, M. (2005). Narratives in and about families: An examination of coding schemes and a guide for family researchers. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 51-61.
6. Gilgun, J. F. (2005). Qualitative research and family psychology. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 40-50.
7. Heatherington, L., Friedlander, M. L., & Greenberg, L. (2005). Change process research in couple and family therapy: Methodological challenges and opportunities, Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 18-27.
8. Henry, D. B., Tolan, P. H., & Gorman-Smith, D. (2005). Cluster analysis in family psychology research. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 121-132.
9. Howe, G. W., Dagne, G., & Brown, C. H. (2005). Multilevel methods for modeling observed sequences of family interaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 72-85.
10. Keiley, M. K., & Martin, N. C. (2005). Survival analysis in family research. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 142-156.
11. Kimble, G. A. (1989). Psychology from the standpoint of a generalist. American Psychologist, 44, 491-499.
12. Laurenceau, J.-P., & Bolger, N. (2005). Using diary methods to study marital and family processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 86-97.
13. Margolin, G., Chien, D., Duman, S. E., Fauchier, A., Gordis, E. B., Oliver, P. H., Ramos, M. C., & Vickerman, K. A. (2005). Ethical issues in couple and family research. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 157-167.
14. Sprenkle, D. H., & Moon, S. M. (1996). Toward pluralism in family therapy research. In D. H. Sprenkle & S. M. Moon (Eds.), Research methods in family therapy (pp. 3-19). New York: Guilford Press.
15. Welsh, D. P., & Dickson, J. (2005). Video-recall procedures for examining subjective understanding in observational data. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 62-71.
16. Whisman, M. A., & McClelland, G. H. (2005). Designing, testing, and interpreting interactions and moderator effects in family research. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 111-120.