Killing economic geography with a "Cultural Turn" overdose

Antipode

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 176-182

  Rodríguez Pose, Andrés ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17244366553     PISSN: 00664812     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8330.00176     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Amin A and Thrift N (2000) What kind of economic theory for what kind of economic geography? Antipode 32:4-9
2. Economic Journal (2000) Section on the state of academic economics in the UK. 110:464
3. Journal of Economic Perspectives (2000) Special issue on economics at the turn of the millennium 14
4. Machin S and Oswald A (2000) UK economics and the future supply of academic economists. The Economic Journal 110:F334-349
5. Markusen A (1999) Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: the case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Regional Studies 33:869-884
6. Martin R (1999a) The new "geographical turn" in economics: some critical reflections. Cambridge Journal of Economics: 23:65-91
7. Martin R (1999b) Editorial: the "new economic geography": challenge or irrelevance? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 24:387-391
8. Martin R (2000) In memory of maps. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 25:3-5
9. Perrons D (1998) Maps of meaning: gender inequality in the regions of western Europe European Urban and Regional Studies 5:13-25