Evaluating the reliability of causes of death in published clinical research

British Medical Journal

Volumn 314, Issue 7076, 1997, Pages 271-

  Start, R D ^a   Bury, J P ^a   Strachan, A G ^a   Cross, S S ^a   Underwood, J C E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOPSY; CAUSE OF DEATH; CLINICAL RESEARCH; HUMAN; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 17144466987     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.314.7076.271     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Britton M. The role of autopsy findings in multicenter treatment evaluations as exemplified by two aspirin trials. Qual Assur Health Care 1993;5:299-302.
2. Bangdiwala SI, Cohn R, Hazard C, Davis CE, Prineas RJ. Comparisons of cause of death verification methods and costs in the lipid research clinics program mortality follow-up study. Control Clin Trials 1989;12:876-80.
3. Research after death [editorial]. Lancet 1994;344:1517-8.
4. Working Group on Recommendations for Reporting of Clinical Trials in the Biomedical literature. Call for comments on a proposal to improve reporting of clinical trials in the biomedical literature. Ann Intern Med 1994;121:894-5.
5. Standards of Reporting Trials Group. A proposal for structured reporting of randomized controlled trials. JAMA 1994;272:1926-31.