Improving undergraduate learning with computer-assisted assessment

Journal of Research on Computing in Education

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 46-54

  Gretes, John A ^a   Green, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Computerized practice testing

Indexed keywords

EID: 17144431515     PISSN: 08886504     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08886504.2000.10782299     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. American Psychological Association. (1986). Guidelines for computer-based tests and interpretations. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Bugbee, A. C. (1992). Examination on demand: Findings in ten years of testing by computer 1982-1991. Edina, MN: TRO Learning.
3. Bugbee, A. C. (1996). The equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computer based testing. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28, 282-299.
4. Bugbee, A. C., & Bernt, F. M. (1990). Testing by computer: Findings in six years of use 1982-1988. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23, 87-100.
5. Bunderson, C. V, Inouye, D. K., & Olsen, J. B. (1989). The four generations of computerized educational measurement. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 367-407). New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan.
6. Croy, M., Cook, J., & Green, M. (1993). Human versus computer feedback: An empirical and pragmatic study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(2), 185-204.
7. Croy, M., Green, M., & Cook, J. (1995). Assessing the impact of a proposed expert system via simulation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13(1), 1-15.
8. Gretes, J. A., & Green, M. (1994). Use of computerized practice tests in undergraduate teacher education. In M. Thomas, T. Sechrest, & N. Estes (Eds.), Deciding our future: Technological imperatives for education. Proceedings of the eleventh International Conference on Technology and Education (vol. 2, pp. 729-731). Austin: University of Texas at Austin.
9. Grist, S., Rudner, L., & Wise, L. (1989). Computer adaptive tests. (ERIC Digest 107). Washington, DC: American Institute for Research and ERIC Clearinghouse on Tests, Measurement, and Evaluation. (ERIC No. ED 31 5 425)
10. Hambleton, R. K., Zaal, J. N., & Pieters, J. IP.M. (1991). Computerized adaptive tests: Theory, applications, and standards. In R. K. Hambleton & J. N. Zaal (Eds.), Advances in educational and psychological testing (pp. 34 1-366). Boston: Kluwer.
11. Kyllonen, P.C. (1991). Principles for creating a computerized test battery. Intelligence, 15, 1-15.
12. Mitra, A. (1998). Categories of computer use and their relationship with attitudes toward computers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30, 281-295.
13. Wise, S. L., & Plake, B. S. (1989). Research on the effects of administering tests via computers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 8, 5-10.