Electroproduction of the S11(1535) resonance at high momentum transfer

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 60, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 1-7

  Armstrong, C S ^b,g   Stoler, P ^f   Adams, G S ^f   Ahmidouch, A ^c,d   Assamagan, K ^c   Avery, S ^c   Baker, O K ^c,g   Bosted, P ^a   Burkert, V ^g   Carlini, R ^g   Dunne, J ^g   Eden, T ^c   Ent, R ^g   Frolov, V V ^f,k   Gaskell, D ^c   Gueye P ^c   Hinton, W ^c   Keppel, C ^c,g   Kim, W ^e   Klusman, M ^f   Koltenuk, D ^h   Mack, D ^g   Madey, R ^c,d   Meekins, D ^b   Minehart, R ⁱ   Mitchell, J ^g   Mkrtchyan, H ^j   Napolitano, J ^f   Niculescu, G ^c   Niculescu, I ^c   Nozar, M ^f   Price, J W ^f,l   Tadevosyan, V ^j   Tang, L ^c,g   Witkowski, M ^f   Wood, S ^g   more..

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b The College of William and Mary   (United States)

^c HAMPTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Kyungpook National University   (South Korea)

^f RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^g THOMAS JEFFERSON NATIONAL ACCELERATOR FACILITY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

ⁱ University of Virginia   (United States)

^j YEREVAN PHYSICS INSTITUTE   (Armenia)

^k UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^l LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17144425401     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.052004     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. N. Isgur and G. Karl, Phys. Lett. 72B, 109 (1977); 74B, 353 (1978).
2. N. Isgur and G. Karl, Phys. Lett. 72B, 109 (1977); 74B, 353 (1978).
3. S. Capstick and B. D. Keister, Phys. Rev. D 51, 3598 (1995).
4. This is a calculation in the light-front model of Ref. [2], which assumes pointlike quarks and simple wave functions, but (in contrast to the published work) uses the standard convention for the normalization of states and a different method for extraction of helicity amplitudes, along with numerical improvements. This effort is ongoing at the time of this writing. S. Capstick (personal communication).
5. R. Stanley and H. Weber, Phys. Rev. C 52, 435 (1995).
6. Z. Li and F. Close, Phys. Rev. D 42, 2207 (1990).
7. M. Warns et al., Z. Phys. C 45, 613 (1990); 45, 627 (1990); Phys. Rev. D 42, 2215 (1990).
8. M. Warns et al., Z. Phys. C 45, 613 (1990); 45, 627 (1990); Phys. Rev. D 42, 2215 (1990).
9. M. Warns et al., Z. Phys. C 45, 613 (1990); 45, 627 (1990); Phys. Rev. D 42, 2215 (1990).
10. C. E. Carlson and J. L. Poor, Phys. Rev. D 38, 2758 (1988).
11. D. B. Leinweber, T. Draper, and R. M. Woloshyn, Phys. Rev. D 46, 3067 (1992).
12. C. S. Armstrong, Ph.D. dissertation, College of William and Mary, 1998.
13. V. V. Frolov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 45 (1999); V. V. Frolov, Ph.D. thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1998.
14. V. V. Frolov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 45 (1999); V. V. Frolov, Ph.D. thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1998.
15. Mp [M. Gari and W. Krümpelmann, Z. Phys. A 322, 689 (1985)].
16. L. N. Hand, Phys. Rev. 129, 1834 (1963).
17. B. Krusche et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3736 (1995).
18. F. Brasse et al., Z. Phys. C 22, 33 (1984).
19. R. L. Walker, Phys. Rev. 182, 1729 (1969).
20. Particle Data Group, C. Caso et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 3, 1 (1998).
21. C. Keppel, Workshop on CEBAF at Higher Energies, Newport News, 1994, edited by N. Isgur and P. Stoler, and C. Keppel, Ph.D. thesis, The American University, 1994. This is a global fit to SLAC resonance electroproduction data. It is similar to earlier work done by Bodek [A. Bodek, Phys. Rev. D 20, 1471 (1979)] and Stoler [P. Stoler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1003 (1991); Phys. Rev. D 44, 73 (1991)]. A similar fit, but to a reduced data set, is found in L. M. Stuart et al., ibid. 58, 032003 (1998). In the kinematic region of the present work, the Keppel and Stuart fits are in agreement at the 2% level.
22. C. Keppel, Workshop on CEBAF at Higher Energies, Newport News, 1994, edited by N. Isgur and P. Stoler, and C. Keppel, Ph.D. thesis, The American University, 1994. This is a global fit to SLAC resonance electroproduction data. It is similar to earlier work done by Bodek [A. Bodek, Phys. Rev. D 20, 1471 (1979)] and Stoler [P. Stoler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1003 (1991); Phys. Rev. D 44, 73 (1991)]. A similar fit, but to a reduced data set, is found in L. M. Stuart et al., ibid. 58, 032003 (1998). In the kinematic region of the present work, the Keppel and Stuart fits are in agreement at the 2% level.
23. C. Keppel, Workshop on CEBAF at Higher Energies, Newport News, 1994, edited by N. Isgur and P. Stoler, and C. Keppel, Ph.D. thesis, The American University, 1994. This is a global fit to SLAC resonance electroproduction data. It is similar to earlier work done by Bodek [A. Bodek, Phys. Rev. D 20, 1471 (1979)] and Stoler [P. Stoler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1003 (1991); Phys. Rev. D 44, 73 (1991)]. A similar fit, but to a reduced data set, is found in L. M. Stuart et al., ibid. 58, 032003 (1998). In the kinematic region of the present work, the Keppel and Stuart fits are in agreement at the 2% level.
24. C. Keppel, Workshop on CEBAF at Higher Energies, Newport News, 1994, edited by N. Isgur and P. Stoler, and C. Keppel, Ph.D. thesis, The American University, 1994. This is a global fit to SLAC resonance electroproduction data. It is similar to earlier work done by Bodek [A. Bodek, Phys. Rev. D 20, 1471 (1979)] and Stoler [P. Stoler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1003 (1991); Phys. Rev. D 44, 73 (1991)]. A similar fit, but to a reduced data set, is found in L. M. Stuart et al., ibid. 58, 032003 (1998). In the kinematic region of the present work, the Keppel and Stuart fits are in agreement at the 2% level.
25. C. Keppel, Workshop on CEBAF at Higher Energies, Newport News, 1994, edited by N. Isgur and P. Stoler, and C. Keppel, Ph.D. thesis, The American University, 1994. This is a global fit to SLAC resonance electroproduction data. It is similar to earlier work done by Bodek [A. Bodek, Phys. Rev. D 20, 1471 (1979)] and Stoler [P. Stoler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1003 (1991); Phys. Rev. D 44, 73 (1991)]. A similar fit, but to a reduced data set, is found in L. M. Stuart et al., ibid. 58, 032003 (1998). In the kinematic region of the present work, the Keppel and Stuart fits are in agreement at the 2% level.
26. L. W. Whitlow et al., Phys. Lett. B 250, 193 (1990).
27. Particle Data Group, Rev. Mod. Phys. 48, S1 (1976).
28. F. Ravndal, Phys. Rev. D 4, 1466 (1971).
29. H. Breuker et al., Phys. Lett. 74B, 409 (1978).
30. F. Brasse et al., Nucl. Phys. B139, 37 (1978).
31. P. Kummer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 873 (1973).
32. U. Beck et al., Phys. Lett. 51B, 103 (1974).
33. J. Alder et al., Nucl. Phys. B91, 386 (1975).
34. M. Aiello, M. M. Giannini, and E. Santopinto, J. Phys. G 24, 753 (1998). The curve shown is the calculation for "potential 1" of that work.
35. N. Kaiser et al., Phys. Lett. B 362, 23 (1995); Nucl. Phys. A612, 297 (1997).
36. N. Kaiser et al., Phys. Lett. B 362, 23 (1995); Nucl. Phys. A612, 297 (1997).
37. N. Isgur and C. H. Llewellyn Smith, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1080 (1984); A. V. Radyushkin, Nucl. Phys. A527, 153c (1991).
38. N. Isgur and C. H. Llewellyn Smith, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1080 (1984); A. V. Radyushkin, Nucl. Phys. A527, 153c (1991).
39. The angular distribution data are available upon request; contact C. S. Armstrong.