Precaution and solidarity

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 199-206

  Häyry, Matti ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTRUISM; BLOOD BANK; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SERVICE; LAW; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; REVIEW; THEORETICAL STUDY;

BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH;

ALTRUISM; BENEFICENCE; BIOETHICAL ISSUES; CLIMATE; ETHICAL THEORY; EUROPE; HUMANS; SOCIAL VALUES;

EID: 17144423639     PISSN: 09631801     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0963180105050255     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. On "principlist" approaches to bioethics, and on autonomy, justice and dignity, see, e.g., Beauchamp TL, Childress JL. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th ed. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001; Gillon R, ed. Principles of Health Care Ethics, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1994; Holm S. Not just autonomy - The principles of American biomedical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 1995;21:332-8; Häyry M. Ethics committees, principles and consequences. Journal of Medical Ethics 1998;24:81-5; Broberg M, Knox JBL, eds. Dignity, Ethics and Law: Bibliography. Copenhagen: Centre for Ethics and Law; 1999; Takala T. What is wrong with global bioethics? On the limitations of the four principles approach. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2001;10:72-7.
2. On "principlist" approaches to bioethics, and on autonomy, justice and dignity, see, e.g., Beauchamp TL, Childress JL. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th ed. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001; Gillon R, ed. Principles of Health Care Ethics, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1994; Holm S. Not just autonomy - The principles of American biomedical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 1995;21:332-8; Häyry M. Ethics committees, principles and consequences. Journal of Medical Ethics 1998;24:81-5; Broberg M, Knox JBL, eds. Dignity, Ethics and Law: Bibliography. Copenhagen: Centre for Ethics and Law; 1999; Takala T. What is wrong with global bioethics? On the limitations of the four principles approach. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2001;10:72-7.
3. On "principlist" approaches to bioethics, and on autonomy, justice and dignity, see, e.g., Beauchamp TL, Childress JL. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th ed. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001; Gillon R, ed. Principles of Health Care Ethics, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1994; Holm S. Not just autonomy - The principles of American biomedical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 1995;21:332-8; Häyry M. Ethics committees, principles and consequences. Journal of Medical Ethics 1998;24:81-5; Broberg M, Knox JBL, eds. Dignity, Ethics and Law: Bibliography. Copenhagen: Centre for Ethics and Law; 1999; Takala T. What is wrong with global bioethics? On the limitations of the four principles approach. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2001;10:72-7.
4. On "principlist" approaches to bioethics, and on autonomy, justice and dignity, see, e.g., Beauchamp TL, Childress JL. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th ed. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001; Gillon R, ed. Principles of Health Care Ethics, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1994; Holm S. Not just autonomy - The principles of American biomedical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 1995;21:332-8; Häyry M. Ethics committees, principles and consequences. Journal of Medical Ethics 1998;24:81-5; Broberg M, Knox JBL, eds. Dignity, Ethics and Law: Bibliography. Copenhagen: Centre for Ethics and Law; 1999; Takala T. What is wrong with global bioethics? On the limitations of the four principles approach. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2001;10:72-7.
5. On "principlist" approaches to bioethics, and on autonomy, justice and dignity, see, e.g., Beauchamp TL, Childress JL. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th ed. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001; Gillon R, ed. Principles of Health Care Ethics, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1994; Holm S. Not just autonomy - The principles of American biomedical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 1995;21:332-8; Häyry M. Ethics committees, principles and consequences. Journal of Medical Ethics 1998;24:81-5; Broberg M, Knox JBL, eds. Dignity, Ethics and Law: Bibliography. Copenhagen: Centre for Ethics and Law; 1999; Takala T. What is wrong with global bioethics? On the limitations of the four principles approach. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2001;10:72-7.
6. On "principlist" approaches to bioethics, and on autonomy, justice and dignity, see, e.g., Beauchamp TL, Childress JL. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th ed. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001; Gillon R, ed. Principles of Health Care Ethics, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1994; Holm S. Not just autonomy - The principles of American biomedical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 1995;21:332-8; Häyry M. Ethics committees, principles and consequences. Journal of Medical Ethics 1998;24:81-5; Broberg M, Knox JBL, eds. Dignity, Ethics and Law: Bibliography. Copenhagen: Centre for Ethics and Law; 1999; Takala T. What is wrong with global bioethics? On the limitations of the four principles approach. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2001;10:72-7.
7. Häyry M. Another look at dignity. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2004;13:7-14.
8. Ministerial Declaration of the Second International Conference on the Protection of the North Sea (1987); Declaration on the Baltic Sea (1990); London Amendments to the Montreal Protocol on the Protection of the Ozone Layer (1990); Rio Summit Declaration on the Environment and Development (1992); Maastricht Treaty (1992). See Martin PH. "If you don't know how to fix it, then please stop breaking it!" The precautionary principle and climate change. Foundations of Science 1997; 2:263-92 at pp. 282-3.
9. Ministerial Declaration of the Second International Conference on the Protection of the North Sea (1987); Declaration on the Baltic Sea (1990); London Amendments to the Montreal Protocol on the Protection of the Ozone Layer (1990); Rio Summit Declaration on the Environment and Development (1992); Maastricht Treaty (1992). See Martin PH. "If you don't know how to fix it, then please stop breaking it!" The precautionary principle and climate change. Foundations of Science 1997; 2:263-92 at pp. 282-3.
10. See note 3, Martin 1997:264.
11. Kaiser M. The precautionary principle and its implications for science: Introduction. Foundations of Science 1997;2:201-5 at p. 202.
12. See note 3, Martin 1997:282, 290; Hermitte M-A. Le Principe de Précaution à la lumière du drame de la transfusion sanguine en France. In: Godard O, ed. Le Principe de Pré caution dans la Conduite des Affaires Humaines. Coéditions INRA, MSH et Association Natures, Sciences, Société-Dialogues; 1997: 179-89.
13. Cf. Häyry M. Playing God: Essays on Bioethics. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press; 2001 at pp. 69, 71-3.
14. See note 3, Representative Dana Rohrabacker, cited in Martin 1997:281.
15. Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1972.
16. Hansson SO. The limits of precaution. Foundations of Science 1997;2:293-306.
17. See, e.g., Bayertz K. Solidarity and the welfare state. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1998;1:293-392; Houtepen R, ter Meulen R. Solidarity in health care. Health Care Analysis 2000;8:329-411; Takala T. Justice for all? The Scandinavian approach. In: Battin M, Rhodes R, Silvers A, eds. Medical and Social Justice: Essays on the Distribution of Health Care. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002:183-90.
18. See, e.g., Bayertz K. Solidarity and the welfare state. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1998;1:293-392; Houtepen R, ter Meulen R. Solidarity in health care. Health Care Analysis 2000;8:329-411; Takala T. Justice for all? The Scandinavian approach. In: Battin M, Rhodes R, Silvers A, eds. Medical and Social Justice: Essays on the Distribution of Health Care. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002:183-90.
19. See, e.g., Bayertz K. Solidarity and the welfare state. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1998;1:293-392; Houtepen R, ter Meulen R. Solidarity in health care. Health Care Analysis 2000;8:329-411; Takala T. Justice for all? The Scandinavian approach. In: Battin M, Rhodes R, Silvers A, eds. Medical and Social Justice: Essays on the Distribution of Health Care. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002:183-90.
20. See, e.g., Hume D. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, orig. 1751, Schneewind JB, ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company; 1983.
21. See, e.g., Bentham J. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, orig. 1789, Burns JH, Hart HLA, eds. London: Methuen; 1982; Mill JS. Utilitarianism, orig. 1861, Sher G, ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company; 1979.
22. See, e.g., Bentham J. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, orig. 1789, Burns JH, Hart HLA, eds. London: Methuen; 1982; Mill JS. Utilitarianism, orig. 1861, Sher G, ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company; 1979.
23. See note 9, Rawls 1972.
24. Häyry M. Liberal Utilitarianism and Applied Ethics. London: Routledge; 1994.
25. Nozick R. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell; 1974; cf. Kant I. Ethical Philosophy, 2nd ed. Ellington JW, transl. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company; 1995.
26. Nozick R. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell; 1974; cf. Kant I. Ethical Philosophy, 2nd ed. Ellington JW, transl. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company; 1995.
27. Houtepen R, ter Meulen R. New types of solidarity in the European welfare state. Health Care Analysis 2000;8:329-40.
28. von Nell-Breuning O. Baugesetze der Gesellschaft. Freiburg: Herder; 1990; McFaden A. The Call to Personhood: A Christian Theory of the Individual in Social Relationships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
29. von Nell-Breuning O. Baugesetze der Gesellschaft. Freiburg: Herder; 1990; McFaden A. The Call to Personhood: A Christian Theory of the Individual in Social Relationships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
30. See note 17, Houtepen, ter Meulen 2000:335.
31. Schuyt K. The sharing of risks and the risks of sharing: Solidarity and social justice in the welfare state. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1998;1:297-311; Ashcroft RE, Campbell AV, Jones S. Solidarity, society and the welfare state in the United Kingdom. Health Care Analysis 2000;8:377-94 at p. 381.
32. Schuyt K. The sharing of risks and the risks of sharing: Solidarity and social justice in the welfare state. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1998;1:297-311; Ashcroft RE, Campbell AV, Jones S. Solidarity, society and the welfare state in the United Kingdom. Health Care Analysis 2000;8:377-94 at p. 381.
33. Pasini N, Reichlin M. Solidarity and the role of the state in Italian health care. Health Care Analysis 2000;8:341-54; Bergmark Å. Solidarity in Swedish welfare: Standing the test of time? Health Care Analysis 2000;8:395-411.
34. Pasini N, Reichlin M. Solidarity and the role of the state in Italian health care. Health Care Analysis 2000;8:341-54; Bergmark Å. Solidarity in Swedish welfare: Standing the test of time? Health Care Analysis 2000;8:395-411.
35. Houtepen R, ter Meulen R. The expectation (s) of solidarity: Matters of justice, responsibility and identity in the reconstruction of the health care system. Health Care Analysis 2000;8:355-76; cf. Habermas J. Zur Bestimmung der Moral. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1986.
36. Houtepen R, ter Meulen R. The expectation (s) of solidarity: Matters of justice, responsibility and identity in the reconstruction of the health care system. Health Care Analysis 2000;8:355-76; cf. Habermas J. Zur Bestimmung der Moral. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp; 1986.
37. Cf. note 22, Houtepen, ter Meulen 2000:361.