Field-scale modeling to explore salinity problems in irrigated agriculture

Irrigation and Drainage

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 77-90

  Droogers, P ^a   Torabi, M ^b   Akbari, M ^b   Pazira, E ^c  

^a INTERNATIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE   (Sri Lanka)

^b Esfahan Agricultural Research Center Iran   (Iran)

^c AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Iran)

Author keywords

Agriculture; Field scale modeling; Salinity

Indexed keywords

EID: 17144419837     PISSN: 15310353     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ird.3     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Boesten JJTI, Stroosnijder L. 1986. Simple model for daily evaporation from fallow tilled soil under spring conditions in a temperate climate. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 34: 75-90.
2. Doorenbos J, Kassam AH. 1979. Yield Response to Water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 33, Rome, Italy.
3. Droogers P, Bastiaanssen WGM, Beyazgül M, Kayam Y, Kite GW, Murray-Rust H. 2000a. Distributed agro-hydrological modeling of an irrigation system in western Turkey. Agric. Water Manag. 43: 183-202.
4. Droogers P, Kite G, Murray-Rust H. 2000b. Use of simulation models to evaluate irrigation performances including water productivity, risk and system analyses. Irrigation Sci. (in press).
5. Feddes RA, Kowalik PJ, Zaradny H. 1978. Simulation of Field Water Use and Crop Yield. Simulation monographs, Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
6. Ghassemi F, Jakeman AJ, Nix HA. 1995. Salinisation of Land and Water Resources: Human Causes, Extent, Management and Case Studies. Canberra, Australia: Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies.
7. Kijne JW, Prathapar SA, Woperis MCS, Sahrawat KL. 1998. How to Manage Salinity in Irrigated Lands: A Selective Review with Particular Reference to Irrigation in Developing Countries. SWIM Paper 2, Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Irrigation Management Institute.
8. Kuper M. 1997. Irrigation management strategies for improved salinity and sodicity control. PhD thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands.
9. Ma QL, Hook JE, Wauchope RD. 1999. Evapotranspiration predictions: a comparison among GLEAMS, Opus, PRZM-2, and RZWQM models in a humid and thermic climate. Agric. Syst. 59: 41-55.
10. Stockle CO, Jara J. 1998. Modeling transpiration and soil water content from a corn (Zea Maize L.) field: 20 min. vs. daytime integration step. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 92: 119-130.
11. Tietje O, Tapkenhinrichs M. 1993. Evaluation of pedo-transfer functions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57: 1088-1095.
12. van Dam JC, Huygen J, Wesseling JG, Feddes RA, Kabat P, vanWalsum PEV, Groenendijk P, van Diepen CA. 1997. Theory of SWAP Version 2.0. Technical Document 45, Wageningen Agricultural University and DLO Winand Staring Centre, The Netherlands.
13. van Diepen CA, Wolf J, van Keulen H, Rappoldt C. 1989. WOFOST: a simulation model of crop production. Soil Use Manag. 5: 16-25.
14. van Genuchten MTh. 1980. A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44: 892-898.
15. Wösten JHM, Lilly A, Nemes A, Le Bas C. 1998. Using Existing Soil Data to Derive Hydraulic Parameters for Simulation Models in Environmental Studies and in Land Use Planning. Report 156, DLO Winand Staring Centre, The Netherlands.