-
11
-
-
84922370883
-
-
S. Khlebnikov, L. Kofman, A. Linde, and I. I. Tkachev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2012 (1998)
-
(1998)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.81
, pp. 2012
-
-
Khlebnikov, S.1
Kofman, L.2
Linde, A.3
Tkachev, I.I.4
-
12
-
-
0000970170
-
-
I. I. Tkachev, S. Khlebnikov, L. Kofman, and A. Linde, Phys. Lett. B 440, 262 (1998)
-
(1998)
Phys. Lett. B
, vol.440
, pp. 262
-
-
Tkachev, I.I.1
Khlebnikov, S.2
Kofman, L.3
Linde, A.4
-
22
-
-
33748856197
-
-
D. Boyanovsky, H. J. de Vega, R. Holman, D. S. Lee, and A. Singh, Phys. Rev. D 51, 4419 (1995)
-
(1995)
Phys. Rev. D
, vol.51
, pp. 4419
-
-
Boyanovsky, D.1
de Vega, H.J.2
Holman, R.3
Lee, D.S.4
Singh, A.5
-
23
-
-
0000939243
-
-
Phys. Rev. DD. Boyanovsky, M. D’Attanasio, H. J. de Vega, R. Holman, D. S. Lee, and A. Singh, 52, 6805 (1995)
-
(1995)
Phys. Rev. D
, vol.52
, pp. 6805
-
-
Boyanovsky, D.1
D’Attanasio, M.2
de Vega, H.J.3
Holman, R.4
Lee, D.S.5
Singh, A.6
-
24
-
-
0000678539
-
-
Phys. Rev. DD. Boyanovsky, H. J. de Vega, R. Holman, D. S. Lee, A. Singh, and J. F. J. Salgado, 54, 7570 (1996)
-
(1996)
Phys. Rev. D
, vol.54
, pp. 7570
-
-
Boyanovsky, D.1
de Vega, H.J.2
Holman, R.3
Lee, D.S.4
Singh, A.5
Salgado, J.F.J.6
-
25
-
-
0000438537
-
-
Phys. Rev. DD. Boyanovsky, D. Cormier, H. J. de Vega, R. Holman, A. Singh, and M. Srednicki, 56, 1939 (1997)
-
(1997)
Phys. Rev. D
, vol.56
, pp. 1939
-
-
Boyanovsky, D.1
Cormier, D.2
de Vega, H.J.3
Holman, R.4
Singh, A.5
Srednicki, M.6
-
33
-
-
0001415982
-
-
P. B. Greene, L. Kofman, A. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. D 56, 6175 (1997).
-
(1997)
Phys. Rev. D
, vol.56
, pp. 6175
-
-
Greene, P.B.1
Kofman, L.2
Linde, A.3
Starobinsky, A.A.4
-
41
-
-
85037195900
-
-
other papers, the value of (Formula presented) is often adopted. However, we have confirmed that the difference for these two cases of (Formula presented) is negligibly small and hardly alters our results and discussions
-
In other papers, the value of (Formula presented) is often adopted. However, we have confirmed that the difference for these two cases of (Formula presented) is negligibly small and hardly alters our results and discussions.
-
-
-
-
45
-
-
0033536836
-
-
B. A. Bassett, F. Tamburini, D. I. Kaiser, and R. Maartens, Nucl. Phys. B561, 188 (1999)
-
(1999)
Nucl. Phys.
, vol.561
, pp. 188
-
-
Bassett, B.A.1
Tamburini, F.2
Kaiser, D.I.3
Maartens, R.4
-
49
-
-
16644403351
-
-
B. A. Bassett, C. Gordon, R. Maartens, and D. I. Kaiser, Phys. Rev. D 61, 061302 (2000).
-
(2000)
Phys. Rev. D
, vol.61
, pp. 61302
-
-
Bassett, B.A.1
Gordon, C.2
Maartens, R.3
Kaiser, D.I.4
-
50
-
-
85037191056
-
-
We have also obtained the approximate equation of the fluctuation around (Formula presented). This is expressed as (Formula presented), and the structure of resonance is different from that of the minimally coupled case. In this case, however, since the (Formula presented) field moves very slowly, the nonadiabatic increase of the fluctuation hardly occurs
-
We have also obtained the approximate equation of the fluctuation around (Formula presented). This is expressed as (Formula presented), and the structure of resonance is different from that of the minimally coupled case. In this case, however, since the (Formula presented) field moves very slowly, the nonadiabatic increase of the fluctuation hardly occurs.
-
-
-
-
57
-
-
0000313434
-
-
Phys. Rev. DV. Zanchin, A. Maia, Jr., W. Craig, and R. Brandenberger, 57, 4651 (1998)
-
(1998)
Phys. Rev. D
, vol.57
, pp. 4651
-
-
Zanchin, V.1
Maia, A.2
Craig, W.3
Brandenberger, R.4
-
58
-
-
16444375396
-
-
Phys. Rev. DV. Zanchin, A. Maia, Jr., W. Craig, and R. Brandenberger, 60, 023505 (1999).
-
(1999)
Phys. Rev. D
, vol.60
, pp. 23505
-
-
Zanchin, V.1
Maia, A.2
Craig, W.3
Brandenberger, R.4
|