Black hole formation in the Friedmann universe: Formulation and computation in numerical relativity

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 60, Issue 8, 1999, Pages

  Sasaki, Misao ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17144413043     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.084002     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. For example, Ya. B. Zel’dovich and I. D. Novikov, Astron. Zh. 43, 758 (1966)
2. S. W. Hawking, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 152, 75 (1971)
3. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.B. J. Carr and S. W. Hawking, 168, 399 (1974)
4. S. W. Hawking, Nature (London) 248, 30 (1974)
5. D. K. Nadezin, I. D. Novikov, and A. G. Polnarev, Sov. Astron. 22, 129 (1978).
6. MACHO Collaboration, C. Alcock, Astrophys. J. 471, 774 (1996).
7. For example, R. Kippenhahn and A. Weigert, Stellar Structure and Evolution (Springer, Berlin, 1990).
8. T. Nakamura, M. Sasaki, T. Tanaka, and K. S. Thorne, Astrophys. J. Lett. 487, L139 (1997).
9. J. Garcia-Bellido, A. Linde, and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D 54, 6040 (1996).
10. J. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. D 58, 083510 (1998).
11. B. J. Carr, Astrophys. J. 201, 1 (1975).
12. P. Ivanov, Phys. Rev. D 57, 7145 (1998).
13. H. Kodama and M. Sasaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 78, 1 (1984).
14. M. Sasaki and T. Tanaka, Prog. Theor. Phys. 99, 763 (1998).
15. J.C. Niemeyer and K. Jedamzik, Phys. Rev. D 59, 124013(1999)
16. Phys. Rev. DK. Jedamzik and J.C. Niemeyer, 59, 124014 (1999).
17. M. Shibata and H. Asada, Prog. Theor. Phys. 94, 11 (1995).
18. M. Shibata, K. Nakao, T. Nakamura, and K. Maeda, Phys. Rev. D 50, 708 (1994).
19. L. Smarr and J.W. York, Phys. Rev. D 17, 1945 (1978).
20. S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1973).
21. H. Kodama, Prog. Theor. Phys. 63, 1217 (1980):We thank K. Nakao for giving us a paper in which Kodama’s result is concisely described.
22. In particular, for 3D simulation in which the grid number we can take is restricted, the minimum distortion gauge may not be appropriate for a black hole formation problem, because the coordinate spreads outward (i.e., (Formula presented) when a matter is collapsing (i.e., (Formula presented) and hence it is soon difficult to keep the numerical accuracy around the collapsing matter. In the case of 3D simulation, it will be necessary to choose the spatial gauge condition more carefully.
23. G.V. Bicknell and R.N. Henriksen, Astrophys. J. 232, 670 (1979).