Pubovaginal sling for urodynamic stress incontinence: Effect on patient quality of life

Irish Medical Journal

Volumn 98, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 75-77

  Clyne, Oonagh J ^a,b   O'Sullivan, O ^a   Flood, H D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL LIMERICK   (Ireland)

^b CITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; CHOLINERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; COLLAGEN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MORBIDITY; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEROMA; SHORT FORM 36; STRESS INCONTINENCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; URGE INCONTINENCE; URINALYSIS; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; URINARY URGENCY; URODYNAMICS; UROLOGIC SURGERY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; QUALITY OF LIFE; SURGICAL MESH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 17144401474     PISSN: 03323102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Goebell R. Zur operation beseitigung der angebornen incontinentia vesicae. Zeitsch Gynakol 1910; 2: 105
2. McGuire EJ and Lytton B. Pubovaginal sling procedure for stress incontinence. J Urol 1978; 119: 82
3. Zaragoza MR. Expanded indications for the pubovaginal sling: treatment of type 2 or 3 stress incontinence. J Urol 996; 156: 1620-22
4. Morgan TO, Westney OL and McGuire EJ. Pubovaginal sling: 4 year outcome analysis and quality of life assessment. J Urol 2000; 163: 1845-48
5. Bowling A, Bond M, Jenkinson C et al. Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey questionnaire: which normative data should be provided by the Omnibus Survey in Britain, the Health Survey for England and the Oxford healthy life survey. Journal of Pubic Health Medicine 1999; Vol 21, pp 255-270
6. Kelleher CJ, Cardozo LD, Khullar V et al. A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women. BJOG 1997; Vol 104, pp 1374-1379
7. Brady CM, Ahmed I, Drumm J et al. A prospective evaluation of the efficiency of early postoperative bladder emptying after the Stamey procedure or pubovaginal sling for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 2001; 165: 160-04
8. Kelleher CJ, Cardozo LD and Toozs-Hobson PM. Quality of life and urinary incontinence. Curr Opin Obstst Gynecol 1995; 7(5): 404-8
9. Hunt SM, McEwen J. The development of a subjective health indicator. Social Health Illness 1980; 2: 231-246
10. Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NMB et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: New Outcome measure for primary care. BMJ 1992; 305: 160-164
11. Jenkinson C, Wright L and Coulter A. Quality of life measurement in health care. A review of measures and population norms for the UK SF-36. Health services research unit 1993; Department of Public Health and Primary Care. University of Oxford. Pp 1-65
12. Badia LX, Castro DD and Conejero ST. Validity of the Kings Health Questionnaire in the assessment of quality of life of patients with urinary incontinence. The Kings Group. Med Clin (Barc) 2000; 114 (117): 647-652
13. Kelleher CJ, Cardozo LD, Khullar V et al. A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women. BJOG 1997; 104 (12): 1374-9
14. Uebersax J, Wyman J, Schumker S et al. Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress nventory. Neurology and Urodynamics 1995; 12: 131-139
15. Beulieu S, Collet JP, Tu LM et al. Performance of the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire in Canada. Can J Urol 1999; 6(1): 692-699
16. Wyman JF. Influence of functional, urological and environmental characteristics on urinary incontinence in community dwelling older women. Nurs Res 1993; 42: 270-275
17. Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS et al. Health related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the incontinence impact questionnaire and the urogenital distress inventory. Continence Program in Women (CPW) 1994; Res Group Qual Life Res 3: 291-306
18. Bidmead J, Cardozo L, McLellan A et al. A comparison of the objective and subjective outcomes of colposuspnsion for stress incontinence in women. BJOG 2001; 108: 408-13
19. Kobelt G, Kichberger I and Malone-Lee J. Quality of life aspects of the overactive bladder and the effects of treatment with tolterodine. BJUI 1999; 83: 583-90
20. Black N, Griffiths J, Pope C et al. Impact of surgery for stress incontinence on morbidity: cohort study. BMJ 1997; 315: 1493-8
21. Litwiller SE, Nelson RS, Fone PD et al. Vaginal wall sling: Long-term outcome analysis of factors contributing to patient satisfaction and surgical success. J Urol 1997; 157: 1279-82
22. McGuire EJ, Bennett CJ, Konnak JA et al. Experience with pubovaginal slings for urinary incontinence at the University of Michigan. J Urol 1987; 138: 525
23. Leach GE, Dmochowski RR, Appell RA et al. Female stress urinary incontinence clinical guidelines panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. The American Urological Association. J Urol 1997; 158: 875
24. McGuire EJ, Lytton B, Kohorn EI et al. The value of urodynamic testing in stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 1980; 124: 256
25. Chaikin DC, Rosenthal J and Blaivas JG. Pubovaginal fascial sling for all types of stress urinary incontinence: Long-term analysis. J Urol 1998; 160:1312