Light verbs and structural case

Lingua

Volumn 115, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 1737-1756

  Karimi Doostan, Gholamhossein ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KURDISTAN   (Iran)

Author keywords

Argument structure; Case; Light verbs; Little v; Transitivity; Verbal nouns

Indexed keywords

EID: 17144391853     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2004.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. D. Adger Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach 2003 Oxford University Press Oxford
2. H. Ahn On light verb construction in Korean and Japanese In: H. Hajime (Ed.) Japanese and Korean Linguistics 1988 Centerfor Study of Language and Information Stanford 221-237
3. Ahn, H., 1991. Light verbs, VP movement, negation and clausal architecture in Korean and English. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
4. M. Baker Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Change 1988 University of Chicago Press Chicago
5. H. Borer The projection of arguments In: Benedicto J. Runner (Ed.) Occasional Papers in Linguistics vol. 17 1994 GLSA, University of Massachusetts Amherst 19-48
6. H. Borer Passive without Theta Grids In: S. Lapointe (Ed.) Morphology and Its Relation to Syntax and Phonology 1998 SCLI Publications Stanford 60-99
7. L. Burzio Italian Syntax: A Government Binding Approach 1986 Reidel
8. L. Burzio Anatomy of a generalization In: E. Reuland (Ed.) Arguments and Case 2000 John Benjamins Publishing Co. Amsterdam 195-240
9. R. Cattell Syntax and Semantics: Composite Predicates in English 1984 Academic Press London
10. L.W. Chafe Meaning and the Structure of Language 1970 University of Chicago Press Chicago
11. R.A. Chametzky Phrase structure In: R. Hendrick (Ed.) Minimalist Syntax 2003 Blackwell Publishing Co. Oxford 192-225
12. I. Choi S. Wechsler Mixed categories and argument transfer in the Korean LVCs Proceedings of Eighth International HPSG Conference Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 3-5 August 2001
13. N. Chomsky Lectures on Government and Binding 1981 Foris Dordrecht
14. N. Chomsky The Minimalist Program 1995 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
15. Chomsky, N., 1999. Derivation by phase. Manuscript. MIT.
16. Chomsky, N., 2001. Beyond explanatory adequacy. Manuscript. MIT.
17. C. Collins The internal structure of vP in JUI'HOAS and #HOAN Studia Linguistica 57 2003 1-25
18. A. Cornilescu Romanian nominalization: Case and aspectual structure Journal of Linguistics 37 2001 467-501
19. Folli, R., Harley, H., Karimi, S., 2003. Determinants of the event type in Persian Complex predicates. In: Astruc, L., Richards, M. (Eds.), Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics.
20. J. Fu T. Roeper H. Borer The VP within process nominals: Evidence from adverbs and VP anaphor do-so NLLT 19 2001 549-582
21. A. Goldberg Words by default: The Persian Complex Predicate Construction In: E.J. Francis L.A. Michaelis (Eds.) Mismatch 2003 Center for the Study of Language and Information Stanford 117-146
22. J. Grimshaw Argument Structure, Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 18 1990 MIT Press Cambridge
23. J. Grimshaw A. Mester Light verbs and theta-marking Linguistic Inquiry 19 1988 205-232
24. K. Hale S.J. Keyser On argument structure and lexical expression of syntactic relations In: K. Hale J. Keyser (Eds.) Views From Building 20 1993 MIT
25. K. Hale S.J. Keyser Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure 2002 MIT Press Cambridge
26. H. Han light verbs and raising Language Research 24 1988 565-581
27. C. Han O. Rambow The Sino-Korean Light Verb Construction and Lexical Argument Structure Paper Presented in Tag+5 Conference Paris, May 2000 25-27
28. Harley, H., 1995. Subjects, events and licensing. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
29. T. Hoekstra The nature of the verbs and Burzio's generalization In: E. Reuland (Ed.) Arguments and Case 2000 John Benjamins Publishing Co. Amsterdam 57-78
30. P.J. Hopper E.C. Traugott Grammaticalization 1993 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
31. M. Isoda The Light Verb Construction in Japanese. Chicago Linguistic Society, vol. 27 1991 University of Chicago Press Chicago pp. 261-275
32. R. Jackendoff Semantic Structure 1990 MIT Press Cambridge
33. K.A. Jayaseelan Complex Predicate and Theta-theory In: Wendy Wilkins (Ed.) Syntax and Semantics 21, Thematic Relations 1988 Academic Press San Diego
34. O. Jespersen A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principle 1965 George & Unwin London
35. Kang, S.Y., 1996. Unaccusative verbs in Korean with a special reference to ci and toy. Manuscript. Ulsan University.
36. Karimi-Doostan, Gh., 1997. Light Verb Constructions in Persian. Ph.D. dissertation, Essex University, England.
37. Gh. Karimi-Doostan N + V Complex Predicates in Persian In: Nicole Dehe A. Wanner (Eds.) Structural Aspects of Semantically Complex Verbs 2001 Peterlang Frankfort 277-292
38. Gh. Karimi-Doostan Ilami Kurdish 2001 Kurdistan University Press Sanandaj
39. S. Karimi Persian Complex Verbs: Idiomatic or Compositional Lexicology 3 1997 273-318
40. Kiefer, F., 1996. The inheritance of aspectual structure. Manuscript. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.
41. J.R. Kim Noun incorporation of ha-verb in Korean The Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Korean Linguistics held at Osaka, Japan 1990
42. Kim, J.R., 1991. A lexical functional account of light verbs. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawaii.
43. S.W. Kim A study of Light Verb Constructions Language Research 30 1994 137-159
44. A. Kratzer Serving the external argument from its verb In: J. Rooryck L. Zaring (Eds.) Phrase and the Lexicon 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht 109-137
45. Karatzer, A., 2002. Telecity and the meaning of object case. Manuscript. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
46. T. Laczko Derived nominals, possessors and Lexical Mapping Theory In: M. Butt T.H. King (Eds.) Argument Realization 2000 CSLI Publications Stanford 189-227
47. Lebeaux, D., 1988. Language acquisition and the form of the Grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
48. B. Levin Hovav M. Rappaport Unaccusativity 1995 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
49. Malouf, R., 1998. Mixed Categories in Hierarchical Lexicon. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University.
50. A. Marantz No escape from syntax: Do not try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon In: A. Dimitriadis L. Seigel (Eds.) University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics vol. 4.2 1997 201-225
51. Marantz A. 1991 Case and licensing. In: Reuland, E. (Ed.), Arguments, Case. John Benjamins Publising Co., Amsterdam, pp. 1-30.
52. J. McCloskey The distribution of subject properties in Irish In: D.W. Davies S. Dublinsky (Eds.) Objects and Other Subjects 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht 157-192
53. Megerdoomian, K., 2000. Beyond words and phrases: A unified theory of predicate composition. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California.
54. K. Megerdoomian Event structure and Complex Predicates in Persian Canadian Journal of Linguistics 46 2001 97-125
55. T. Miyamoto The Light Verb Construction in Japanese 1999 John Benjamins Publishing Co. The Netherlands
56. Mohammad, J., Karimi, S., 1992. Light verbs are taken over: Complex verbs in Persian. In: Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics, vol. 5, pp. 195-212.
57. F.J. Newmeyer Grammatical functions, thematic roles, and phrase structure: Their underliying disunity In: D.W. Davies S. Dublinsky (Eds.) Objects and Other Subjects 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht 53-75
58. O'Grady, W., 1992. On the status of hata in multiple complement. In: Proceedings of the 1992 Seoul International Conference on Linguistics, pp. 238-247.
59. Park, K., 1992. Light Verb Constructions in Korean and Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel.
60. D.M. Perlmutter Impersonal passives and unaccusativity Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society Berkeley Linguistics Society, University of California, Berkeley 1978 157-189
61. A. Radford Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English 2004 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
62. E. Ritter S.T. Rosen Strong and weak predicates: Reducing the lexical burden Linguistic Analysis 26 1996 29-62
63. I. Roberts A. Roussou Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization 2003 Cambridge University Press
64. Saito, M., Hoshi, H., 2000. The Japanese Light Verb Construction and the Minimalist Program. In: Martin, R., Michaels, D., Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 261-295.
65. Sato, Y., 1993. Complex Predicate Formation with verbal nouns in Japanese and Korean: Argument transfer at LV. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawaii.
66. C.T. Schutze On Korean Case Stacking: The varied functions of the particles ka and lul The Linguistic Review 18 2001 193-232
67. Sells, P., 1995. The category and case-marking properties of verbal nouns in Korean. Manuscript. Stanford University.
68. H.A. Sigurdsson The locus of case and agreement Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 65 2000 65-108
69. H.A. Sigurdsson Case: Abstract vs. morphological In: B. Ellen H. Zinzmeister (Eds.) New Perspectives on Case Theory 2003 CSLI Publications Stanford 223-268
70. T. Stroik On the light verb hypothesis Linguistic Inquiry 32 2001 362-369
71. P. Svenonius Case is uninterpretable aspect Proceedings on Perspectives on Aspect Utrecht 2002
72. Terada, M., 1990. Incorporation and argument structure in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
73. Vainikka, A., 1996. Verb raising in questions. Presentation at the Penn Linguistics Colloquiuam, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, February.
74. Vahedi-Langrudi, M., 1996. The syntax, semantics and argument structure of Complex Predicates in modern Farsi. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Ottawa.
75. J. Zeller Prefixes as Transitivizers In: N. Dehe A. Wanner (Eds.) Structural Aspects of Semantically Complex Verbs 2001 Peterlang Frankfort 1-31