Comparison of a T1-weighted inversion-recovery-, gradient-echo- and spin-echo sequence for imaging of the brain at 3.0 Tesla;Vergleich einer T1-gewichteten inversion-recovery-, gradienten-echo- und spin-echo-sequenz zur zerebralen bildgebung bei 3,0 Tesla

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 177, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 536-542

  Stehling, C ^a   Niederstadt, T ^a   Kramer S ^a   Kugel, H ^a   Schwindt, W ^a   Heindel, W ^a   Bachmann, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

3 Tesla; Brain; Cerebral imaging; CNR; Magnetic resonance imaging; T1 weighted sequences

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOBUTROL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BRAIN; BRAIN TUMOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTRAST NOISE RATIO; FEMALE; GRAY MATTER; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; WHITE MATTER;

BRAIN; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEURONS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 17144384835     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-857902     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Takahashi M, Uematsu H, Hatabu H. MR imaging at high magnetic fields. Eur J Radiol 2003; 46: 45-52
2. Willinek WA, Gieseke J, Falkenhausen Mvon et al. Sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for high spatial resolution time-of-flight MR angiography of the intracranial arteries at 3.0 T. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 21-26
3. Hawighorst H, Knopp MV, Debus J et al. Morphologische MR-Bildgebung mit T1-gewichteten Sequenzen zur radiotherapeutischen Zielvolumendefinition von intrakraniellen Tumoren: Vergleich von FLASH-, Turbo-FLASH- und SE-Sequenzen. Radiologe 1997; 37: 243-250
4. Chappell PM, Pelc NJ, Foo TK et al. Comparison of lesion enhancement on spin-echo and gradient-echo images. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994; 15:37-44
5. Fellner F, Fellner C, Held P et al. Comparison of spin-echo MR pulse sequences for imaging of the brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997; 18: 1617-1625
6. Koenig SH, Brown RD 3rd, Spiller M et al. Relaxometry of brain: why white matter appears bright in MRI. Magn Reson Med 1990; 14: 482-495
7. Duewell S, Wolff SD, Wen H et al. MR imaging contrast in human brain tissue: assessment and optimization at 4 T. Radiology 1996; 199: 780-786
8. Henkelman RM. Measurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR images. Med Phys 1985; 12: 232-233
9. Schwindt W, Kugel H, Bachmann R et al. Magnetic resonance imaging protocols for examination of the neurocranium at 3 T. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 2170-2179
10. Schmitt F, Grosu D, Mohr C et al. 3 Tesla-MRT: Der Erfolg höherer Feldstärken. Radiologe 2004; 44: 31-47
11. Daldrup HE, Schuierer G, Link TM et al. Evaluation of myelination and myelination disorders with turbo inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 1997; 7: 1478-1484
12. Barkovich AJ, Kjos BO, Jackson DE Jr et al. Normal maturation of the neonatal and infant brain: MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1988; 166: 173-180
13. Nitz WR. Magnetresonanztomographie: Sequenzakronyme und weitere Kürzel in der MR-Bildgebung. Radiologe 2003; 43: 745-763
14. Lee JK, Choi HY, Lee SW et al. Usefulness of T1-weighted image with fast inversion recovery technique in intracranial lesions: Comparison with T1-weighted spin echo image. Clin Imaging 2000; 24: 263-269
15. Reich CA, Hudgins PA, Sheppard SK et al. A high-resolution fast spin-echo inversion-recovery sequence for preoperative localization of the internal globus pallidus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21: 928-931
16. Rydberg JN, Hammond CA, Huston J et al. T1-weighted MR imaging of the brain using a fast inversion recovery pulse sequence. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6: 356-362
17. Barbier EL, Marrett S, Danek A et al. Imaging cortical anatomy by high-resolution MR at 3.0 T: detection of the stripe of Gennari in visual area 17. Magn Reson Med 2002; 48: 735-738
18. Pan JW, Vaughan JT, Kuzniecky RI et al. High resolution neuroimaging at 4.1 T. Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 13: 915-921
19. Nakamura H, Yamada K, Kizu O et al. Optimization of T1 values in inversion-recovery MR sequences for the depiction of fine structures within gray and white matter: separation of globus pallidus interna and externa. Acad Radiol 2003; 10: 58-63
20. Wu HM, Yousem DM, Chung HW et al. Influence of Imaging Parameters on High-Intensity Cerebrospinal Fluid Artifacts in Fast-FLAIR MR Imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23: 393-399
21. Trattnig S, Ba-Ssalamah A, Nobauer-Huhmann IM et al. Kontrastmittelanwendung auf Hochfeld-(3 T-)MRT. Radiologe 2004; 44: 56-64
22. Nobauer-Huhmann IM, Ba-Ssalamah A, Mlynarik V et al. Magnetic resonance imaging contrast enhancement of brain tumors at 3 tesla versus 1.5 tesla. Investigative Radiology 2002; 37: 114-119
23. Rinck PA, Muller RN. Field strength and dose dependence of contrast enhancement by gadolinium-based MR contrast agents. Eur Radiol 1999; 9: 998-1004
24. Krautmacher C, Tschampa HJ, Born M et al. 3.0 Tesla versus 1.5 Tesla MRI of Contrast Enhancing Brain Tumors: Evaluation of T1-weighted SE, FFE and MDEFT Sequences. RSNA 2003; Abstract code: T09-1458