Phenotypic plasticity in Philonotis fontana (Bryopsida: Bartramiaceae)

Journal of Bryology

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 13-22

  Buryová, Blanka ^a,b   Shaw, A Jonathan ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (Czech Republic)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Bryophytes; Norms of reaction; Phenotypic plasticity; Philonotis fontana; Vegetative reproduction

Indexed keywords

BARTRAMIACEAE; BRYOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTES; PHILONOTIS FONTANA;

EID: 17144379728     PISSN: 03736687     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1179/174328205X40545     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Allen B. 1999. The genus Philonotis (Bartramiaceae, Musci) in Central America. Haussknectnia Beiheft 9: 19-36.
2. Anon. 1998. User's guide 2: data analysis and quality tools. State College, PA: Minitab.
3. Bradshaw AD. 1965. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Advances in Genetics 13: 115-155.
4. Buryová B. 2004. Genetic variation in two closely related species of Philonotis based on isozymes: Bryologist 107: 316-327.
5. Crum H, Anderson LE. 1981. Mosses of eastern North America. Volume 1. New York: Columbia University Press.
6. Daniels RE. 1993. Phenotypic and genotypic variation in Sphagnum. Advances in Bryology 5: 31-60.
7. Dismier MG. 1907. Essai monographique sur les Philonotis de France. Mémoires de la Société Nationale des Sciences Naturelles et Mathématiques de Cherbourg 36: 367-428.
8. Dismier MG. 1910. Revision des Philonotis de l'Amérique. Mémoires de la Société Botanique de France 17: 1-37.
9. Flowers S. 1935. Bartramiaceae. In: Grout AJ, ed. Moss flora of North America north of Mexico, Volume 2. Newfane: by the author, 152-180.
10. Griffin D. 2003. Philonotis. In: Version: 1, Date: November 26, 2003, Bryophyte flora of North America, Provisional Publication, Missouri Botanical Garden (http://ridgwaydb.mobot.org/bfna/V2/BartPhilonotis.htm)
11. Horton DG, Vitt DH. 1976. Morphological characters relative to distribution and taxonomic considerations of the genus Climacium in North America. Canadian Journal of Botany 54: 1872-1883.
12. Kabiersch W. 1938. Studien über die ostasiatischen Arten einiger Laubmossfamilien II. Rhizogoniaceae, Bartramiaceae, Aulacomniaceae, Meeseaceae. Hedwigia 77: 71-136.
13. Kammerer K. 1998. Kulturversuche und morphologische Taxonomie bei Philonotis Brid. (Musci). Diploma thesis, Institut für Botanik der Universität Hohenheim.
14. Koponen T. 1998. Notes on Philonotis (Musci, Bartramiaceae). 3. A synopsis of the genus in China. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 84: 21-27.
15. Koponen T, Norris DH. 1996. Bryophyte flora of the Huon Peninsula, Papua New Guinea. LVII. Fleischerobryum and Philonotis (Bartramiaceae, Musci). Acta Botanica Fennica 156: 1-21.
16. Lodge E. 1960. Effects of certain cultivation treatments on the morphology of some British species of Drepanocladus. Botanical Journal of Linnean Society, 56: 218-224.
17. Loeske L. 1906. Kritische Übersicht der europäischen Philonoten. Hedwigia 45: 195-212.
18. Nyholm E. 1998. Illustrated flora of Nordic mosses. Fasc. 4. Copenhagen and Lund: Nordic Bryological Society.
19. Ochi H. 1962. Contribution to the mosses of Bartramiaceae in Japan and the adjacent region (1). Nova Hedwigia 4: 87-108.
20. Rohlf FJ. 1992. NTSYS-pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis. Version 1.70. Setauket.
21. Ross SE, Callaghan TV, Sonesson M, Sheffield E. 2001. Variation and control of growth-form in the moss Hylocomium splendens. Journal of Bryology 23: 283-292.
22. SAS Institute 1991. SAS user's guide: statistics. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
23. Såstad SM, Pedersen B, Digre K. 1999. Habitat-specific genetic effects on growth rate and morphology across pH and water-level gradients within a population of the moss Sphagnum angustifolium (Sphagnaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 1687-1698.
24. Schlichting CD, Levin DA. 1986. Phenotypic plasticity: an evolving plant character. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 29: 37-47.
25. Shaw AJ. 1990. Genetic and environmental effects on morphology and asexual reproduction in the moss, Bryum bicolor. Bryologist 93: 1-6.
26. Shaw AJ, Bartow SM, 1991. Genetic structure and phenotypic plasticity in proximate populations of the moss, Funaria hygrometrica. Systematic Botany 17: 257-271.
27. Shaw AJ, Beer SC, 1999. Life history variation in gametophyte populations of the moss Ceratodon purpureus (Ditrichaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 512-521.
28. Stenøien H, Bakken S, Flatberg KI. 1997. Phenotypic variation in the Sphagnum recurvum complex: a cultivation experiment. Journal of Bryology 19: 731-750.
29. Ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P. 2002. CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user's guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Ithaca, NY: Microcomputer Power.
30. Vanderpoorten A, Jacquemart AL. 2004. Evolutionary mode, tempo, and phylogenetic association of continuous morphological traits in the aquatic moss genus Amblystegium. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17: 279-287.
31. Via S. 1993. Adapative phenotypic plasticity - target or by-product of selection in a variable environment. American Naturalist 142: 352-365.
32. Via S, Gomulkiewicz R, de Jong G, Schemer SM, Schlichting CD, van Tienderen PH. 1995. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10: 212-217.
33. Zales WM. 1973. A taxonomic revision of the genus Philonotis for North America, north of Mexico. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
34. Zastrow E. 1934. Experimentelle Studien über die Anpassung von Wasser- und Sumpfmoosen. Pflanzenforschung Heft 17. Jena: Fischer.