QTL mapping in testcrosses of European flint lines of maize: I. Comparison of different testers for forage yield traits

Crop Science

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 921-931

  Lübberstedt, Thomas ^a   Melchinger, Albrecht E ^a   Schön, Chris C ^b   Utz, H Friedrich ^a   Klein, Dietrich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

^b KWS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 17044452877     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700030037x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abler, B. S. B., M. D. Edwards, and C.W. Stuber. 1991. Isoenzymatic identification of QTL in crosses of elite maize inbreds. Crop Sci. 31:267-274.
2. Ajmone-Marsan, P., G. Monfredini, W.F. Ludwig, A.E. Melchinger, P. Franceschini, G. Pagnotto, and M. Motto. 1994. Identification of genomic regions affecting plant height and their relationship with grain yield in an elite maize cross. Maydica. 39:133-139.
3. Argillier, O., Y. Barrière, and Y. Hébert. 1995. Genetic variation and selection criterion for digestibility traits of forage maize. Euphytica. 82:175-184
4. Barriere., Y., Y. Hébert, B. Julier, E. Young, and V. Furstoss. 1993. Genetic variation for silage and NIRS traits in an half-diallel design of 21 inbred lines of maize. Maydica. 38:7-13.
5. Beavis, W.D., D. Grant, M. Albertsen, and R. Fincher. 1991. Quantitative trait loci for plant height in four maize populations and their associations with qualitative genetic loci. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 141-145.
6. Beavis, B. 1994. The power and deceit of QTL experiments: Lessons from comparative QTL studies. p. 250-266. In Proceedings of the Forty-Ninth Annual Corn and Sorghum Industry Research Conference, ASTA, Washington, DC.
7. 4 progeny from maize. Crop Sci. 34:882-896.
8. Bohn, M., M.M. Khairallah, D. Gonzalez-de-Leon, D. Hoisington, H.F. Utz, J.A. Deutsch, D.C. Jewell, J.A. Mihm, and A.E. Melchinger. 1996. QTL mapping in tropical maize: I. Genomic regions affecting leaf feeding resistance to sugarcane borer and other traits. Crop Sci. 36:1352-1361.
9. Darvasi, A., A. Weinreb, V. Minke, J.I. Weller, and M. Soller. 1993. Detecting marker-QTL linkage and estimating QTL gene effect and map location using a saturated genetic map. Genetics. 134:943-951.
10. Degenhardt, H. 1996. NIRS-Untersuchungen zur Erfassung futterwer-trelevanter Qualitätsparameter von Silomaissorten in einem Gerätenetzwerk. Landbauforschung Völkenrode, Sonderheft 163. Ph. D. Thesis, Martin-Luther Universitaet, Halle-Wottenberg, Germany.
11. Dhillon, B.S., C. Paul, E. Zimmer, P.A. Gurrath, D. Klein, and W.G. Pollmer. 1990a. Variation and covariation in stover digestibility traits in diallel crosses of maize. Crop Sci. 30:931-936.
12. Dhillon, B.S., P.A. Gurrath, E. Zimmer, M. Wermke, and W.G. Pollmer. 1990b. Analysis of diallel crosses of maize for variation and covariation in agronomic traits at silage and grain harvests. Maydica. 35:297-302.
13. Draper, N.R., and H. Smith. 1981. Applied regression analysis. Wiley & Sons, New York.
14. Edwards, M., and L. Johnson. 1994. RFLPs for rapid recurrent selection. Proc. Symposium Analysis of Molecular Marker Data. Joint Plant Breeding Symposia Series, Corvallis, OR.
15. Gallais, A., M. Pollacsek, and L. Huguet. 1976. Possibilites de selection du maïs en tant que plante fourragere. Annales d'Amelioration des Plantes. 26:591-605.
16. Geiger, H.H., A.E. Melchinger, and G.A. Schmidt. 1986. Analysis of factorial crosses between flint and dent inbred lines for forage performance and quality traits. In Proceedings of the 13th Congress of the Maize and Sorghum Section of EUCARPIA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
17. Geiger, H.H., G. Seitz, A.E. Melchinger, and G.A. Schmidt. 1992. Genotypic correlations in forage maize. I. Relationships among yield and quality traits in hybrids. Maydica. 37:95-99.
18. Haley, C.S. and S.A. Knott. 1992. A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity 69:315-324.
19. Jansen, R.C. 1993. Interval mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci. Genetics 135:205-211.
20. Jansen, R.C. 1994. Controlling the type I and type II errors in mapping quantitative trait loci. Genetics. 138:871-881.
21. Jansen, R.C. and P. Stam. 1994. High resolution of quantitative traits into multiple loci via interval mapping. Genetics. 136:1447-1455.
22. Jansen, R.C., J.W. van Oijen, P. Stam, C. Lister, and C. Dean. 1995. Genotype-by-environment interaction in genetic mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91:33-37.
23. Jiang, C. and Z.-B. Zeng. 1995. Multiple trait analysis of genetic mapping for quantitative trait loci. Genetics. 140:1111-1127.
24. Knapp, S.J., W.W. Stroup, and W.M. Ross. 1985. Exact confidence intervals for heritability on a progeny mean basis. Crop Sci. 25: 192-196.
25. Lande, R. and R. Thompson. 1990. Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics. 124: 743-756.
26. Lander, E.S. and D. Botstein. 1989. Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics. 121:185-199.
27. Lee, M. 1995. DNA markers and plant breeding programs. Adv. Agron. 55:265-344.
28. Lin, Y.-R., K.F. Schertz, and A.H. Paterson. 1995. Comparative analysis of QTL affecting plant height and maturity across the poaceae, in reference to an interspecific sorghum population. Genetics. 141:391-411.
29. Mistele, M., J. Zeddies, H.F. Utz, and A.E. Melchinger. 1994. Economic aspects of breeding for yield and quality traits in forage maize: I. Determination of economic weights. Plant Breeding 112: 102-109.
30. Mode, C.J., and H.F. Robinson. 1959. Pleiotropism and the genetic variance and covariance. Biometrics. 15:518-537.
31. Moreno-Gonzalez, J. 1993. Relationships for linked loci in advanced random and nonrandom mating populations. J. Genet. Breed. 47: 9-14.
32. Ooijen, J.W. van. 1992. Accuracy of mapping quantitative trait loci in autogamous species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84:803-811.
33. Paterson, A.H., S. Damon, J.D. Hewitt, D. Zamir, H.D. Rabinowitch, S.E. Lincoln, E.S. Lander, and S.D. Tanksley. 1990. Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: Comparison across species, generations, and environments. Genetics 127:181-197.
34. Paterson, A.H., J.W. DeVerna, B. Lanini, and S.D. Tanksley. 1991. Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using selected overlapping recombinant chromosomes, in an interspecies cross of tomato. Genetics 124:735-742.
35. Patterson, H.D., and E.R. Williams. 1976. A new class of resolvable incomplete block designs. Biometrika 63:83-92.
36. Satterthwaite, F.E. 1946. An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biom. Bull. 2:110-114.
37. Schön, C.C., A.E. Melchinger, J. Boppenmaier, E. Brunklaus-Jung, R.G. Herrmann, and J.F. Seitzer. 1994. RFLP mapping in maize: Quantitative trait loci affecting testcross performance of elite European flint lines. Crop Sci. 34:378-389.
38. Searle, S.R. 1971. Linear models. Wiley & Sons, New York.
39. Stam, P. 1994. Marker-assisted breeding. p. 32-44. In J.W. van Ooijen et al. (ed.) Biometrics in plant breeding: Applications of molecular markers. Proceedings of the Ninth Meeting of the EUC-ARPIA Section Biometrics in Plant Breeding, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
40. Struik, P.C., and B. Deinum. 1990. The ideotype for forage maize. p. 223-242. Proceedings of the 15th Congress of Maize and Sorghum Section of EUCARPIA. Baden, Austria.
41. Stuber, C.W. 1994. Successes in the use of molecular markers for yield enhancement in corn. p. 232-238. In Proceedings of the Forty-Ninth Annual Corn and Sorghum Industry Research Conference, ASTA, Washington DC.
42. Stuber, C.W., S.E. Lincoln, D.W. Wolff, T. Helentjaris, and E.S. Lander. 1992. Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics. 132:823-839.
43. Utz, H.F., A.E. Melchinger, G. Seitz, M. Mistele, and J. Zeddies. 1994. Economic aspects of breeding for yield and quality traits in forage maize. Plant Breeding 112:110-119.
44. Utz, H.F., A.E. Melchinger. 1994. Comparison of different approaches to interval mapping of quantitative trait loci. p. 195-204. In J.W. van Ooijen et al. (ed.) Biometrics in plant breeding: Applications of molecular markers. Proceedings of the Ninth Meeting of the EUCARPIA Section Biometrics in Plant Breeding, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
45. Utz, H.F., and A.E. Melchinger. 1996. PLABQTL: A program for composite interval mapping of QTL. J. Quant. Trait Loci. http: //probe.nalusda.gov:8000/otherdocs/jqtl.
46. Vattikonda, M.R., and R.B. Hunter. 1983. Comparison of grain yield and whole-plant silage production of recommended corn hybrids. Can. J. Plant Sci. 63:601-609.
47. Veldboom, L.R., M. Lee, and W.L. Woodman. 1994. Molecular marker-facilitated studies in an elite maize population: I. Linkage analysis and determination of QTL for morphological traits. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88:7-16.
48. Zeng, Z.-B. 1994. Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics. 136:1457-1468.