Impact of |ΔI|=5/2 transitions in K→ππ decays

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 62, Issue 9, 2000, Pages 1-15

  Gardner, S ^a   Valencia, G ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b FERMI NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY   (United States)

^c IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17044440114     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.094024     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. J. Bijnens and J. Prades, J. High Energy Phys. 01, 023 (1999); T. Hambye, G.O. Kohler, and P.H. Soldan, Eur. Phys. J. C 10, 271 (1999); S. Bertolini, J. O. Eeg, M. Fabbrichesi, and E. I. Lashin, Nucl. Phys. B514, 63 (1998).
2. J. Bijnens and J. Prades, J. High Energy Phys. 01, 023 (1999); T. Hambye, G.O. Kohler, and P.H. Soldan, Eur. Phys. J. C 10, 271 (1999); S. Bertolini, J. O. Eeg, M. Fabbrichesi, and E. I. Lashin, Nucl. Phys. B514, 63 (1998).
3. J. Bijnens and J. Prades, J. High Energy Phys. 01, 023 (1999); T. Hambye, G.O. Kohler, and P.H. Soldan, Eur. Phys. J. C 10, 271 (1999); S. Bertolini, J. O. Eeg, M. Fabbrichesi, and E. I. Lashin, Nucl. Phys. B514, 63 (1998).
4. J. Gasser and U-G. Meissner, Phys. Lett. B 258, 219 (1991).
5. B. Ananthanarayan, G. Colangelo, J. Gasser, and H. Leutwyler, hep-ph/0005297.
6. B.R. Holstein, Phys. Rev. D 20, 1187 (1979).
7. H.-Y. Cheng, Phys. Lett. B 201, 155 (1988).
8. S. Bosch et al., Nucl. Phys. B565, 3 (2000).
9. A.J. Buras, Eur. Phys. J. C, 11, 93 (1999); in Probing the Standard Model of Particle Interactions, Les Houches Lectures, edited by F. David and R. Gupta (Elsevier, New York, in press), and references therein.
10. A.J. Buras, Eur. Phys. J. C, 11, 93 (1999); in Probing the Standard Model of Particle Interactions, Les Houches Lectures, edited by F. David and R. Gupta (Elsevier, New York, in press), and references therein.
11. J. Bijnens and M. Wise, Phys. Lett. 137B, 245 (1984).
12. J.F. Donoghue et al., Phys. Lett. B 179, 361 (1986).
13. A.J. Buras and J.M. Gerard, Phys. Lett. B 192, 156 (1987).
14. S. Gardner and G. Valencia, Phys. Lett. B 466, 355 (1999).
15. G. Ecker, G. Müller, H. Neufeld, and A. Pich, Phys. Lett. B 477, 88 (2000).
16. T.J. Devlin and J.O. Dickey, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 237 (1979).
17. J. Kambor, J. Missimer, and D. Wyler, Phys. Lett. B 261, 496 (1991).
18. V. Cirigliano, J.F. Donoghue, and E. Golowich, Phys. Rev. D 61, 093001 (2000); 61, 093002 (2000). The specific results we include come from the latter reference.
19. V. Cirigliano, J.F. Donoghue, and E. Golowich, Phys. Rev. D 61, 093001 (2000); 61, 093002 (2000). The specific results we include come from the latter reference.
20. E. de Rafael, TASI 94 lectures, hep-ph/9502254.
21. - is a factor of 2 larger than suggested by Eq. (2.2).
22. 2=l, so that the J=0 state is of odd parity.
23. K is the transition of 2π→4π with a threshold of √s≃0.56 GeV; this reaction is also strongly phase-space suppressed near threshold, so that no significant inelasticity exists for √s<0.8 GeV [3].
24. In writing Eq. (2.8), we follow the form of the coupled-channel S matrix for J=1, S=1 nucleon-nucleon scattering in the presence of a tensor force; note M.A. Preston and R.K. Bhaduri, Structure of the Nucleus (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975), p. 141ff.
25. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 158, 142 (1984).
26. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Nucl. Phys. B250, 465 (1985).
27. T.D. Lee, Particle Physics and Introduction to Field Theory (Harwood Academic, Chur, Switzerland, 1981), p. 274ff.
28. I,I3, where I =0,2, is identically zero.
29. 2 assumes that these neglected terms are negligible relative to the electromagnetic effects we consider.
30. 5/2 contributions - so that, in this basis, the extra amplitude is labeled "I=1".
31. Particle Data Group, C. Caso et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 3, 1 (1998).
32. Choosing the - sign in Eq. (3.5) yields |y|>|x|, which is unacceptable.
33. M. Knecht and R. Urech, Nucl. Phys. B519, 329 (1998); U.-G. Meissner, G. Müller, and S. Steininger, Phys. Lett. B 406, 154 (1997); 407, 454(E) (1997).
34. M. Knecht and R. Urech, Nucl. Phys. B519, 329 (1998); U.-G. Meissner, G. Müller, and S. Steininger, Phys. Lett. B 406, 154 (1997); 407, 454(E) (1997).
35. M. Knecht and R. Urech, Nucl. Phys. B519, 329 (1998); U.-G. Meissner, G. Müller, and S. Steininger, Phys. Lett. B 406, 154 (1997); 407, 454(E) (1997).
36. We thank M. Sevior and G. Smith for discussions concerning this point.
37. G. Amoros, J. Bijnens, and P. Talavera, hep-ph/0003258, and references therein.
38. W. Ochs, πN Newslett. 3, 25 (1991).
39. J.F. Donoghue, C. Ramirez, and G. Valencia, Phys. Rev. D 38, 2195 (1988).
40. E. Chell and M.G. Ohlssen, Phys. Rev. D 48, 4076 (1993).
41. The authors of Ref. [15] also conclude this.
42. - branching ratio were varied by +3σ or +0.84%, the value of y decreases by 50%.
43. J.A. Cronin, Phys. Rev. 161, 1483 (1967).
44. A. Pich and E. de Rafael, Nucl. Phys. B358, 311 (1991).
45. H. Leutwyler, Phys. Lett. B 378, 313 (1996).
46. I or of the amplitudes themselves, but the form of the parametrization in Eq. (2.25) persists.
47. J.F. Donoghue, E. Golowich, and B.R. Holstein, Dynamics of the Standard Model (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1994).
48. A. Pich, B. Guberina, and E. de Rafael, Nucl. Phys. B277, 197 (1986).
49. J. Kambor, J. Missimer, and D. Wyler, Nucl. Phys. B346, 17 (1990).
50. J.F. Donoghue (private communication).
51. C.E. Wolfe and K. Maltman, Phys. Lett. B 482, 77 (2000).
52. KTeV Collaboration, A. Alavi-Harati et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 22 (1999); NA48 Collaboration, V. Fanti et al., Phys. Lett. B 465, 335 (1999).
53. KTeV Collaboration, A. Alavi-Harati et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 22 (1999); NA48 Collaboration, V. Fanti et al., Phys. Lett. B 465, 335 (1999).
54. NA31 Collaboration, G.D. Barr et al., Phys. Lett. B 317, 233 (1993); E731 Collaboration, L.K. Gibbons et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1203 (1993).
55. NA31 Collaboration, G.D. Barr et al., Phys. Lett. B 317, 233 (1993); E731 Collaboration, L.K. Gibbons et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1203 (1993).
56. G. Branco, L. Lavoura, and J. P. Silva, CP Violation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 1999), p. 99.
57. η+η′=0.16 of Ref. [12].