Discrete event fluid modeling of background TCP traffic

ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 211-250

  Nicol, David M ^a,c   Yan, Guanhua ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

^c United States of America   (United States)

^d Dartmouth College   (United States)

Author keywords

TCP; Traffic modeling

Indexed keywords

SWITCHING MODELS; TCP; TRAFFIC MODELING; TRANSPORT LAYER PROTOCOL (TCP);

ALGORITHMS; BANDWIDTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISCRETE TIME CONTROL SYSTEMS; FLUID DYNAMICS; INTERNET; MULTICASTING; PACKET NETWORKS; TELECOMMUNICATION TRAFFIC;

NETWORK PROTOCOLS;

EID: 17044435120     PISSN: 10493301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1010621.1010622     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. AHN, J. AND DANZIG, P. 1996. Packet network simulation : Speedup and accuracy versus timing granularity. IEEE I ACM Trans. Network. 4, 5 (Oct.), 743-757.
2. ALTMAN, E., AVRACHENKOV, K., AND BARAKAT, C. 2000. A stochastic model of TCP/IPs with stationary random losses. In Proceedings of SIGCOMM '00 (Stockholm, Sweden).
3. NICOL, D. 2001. Discrete-event fluid modeling of TCP. In Proceedings of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference (Arlington, VA).
4. Guo, Y., GONG, W., AND TOWSLEY, D. 2000. Time-stepped hybrid simulation (TSHs) for large scale networks. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2000 (Tel Aviv, Israel). 441-450.
5. KESIDIS, G., SINGH, A., CHEUNG, D., AND KWOK, W. 1996. Feasibility of fluid event-driven simulation for ATM networks. In IEEE Globecom 1996.
6. KESIDIS, G. AND WALRAND, J. C. 1993. Quick simulation of ATM buffers with on-off multiclass Markov fluid sources. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Sim. 3, 3, 269-276.
7. KUMARAN, K. AND MITRA, D. 2001. Performance and fluid simulations of a novel shared buffer management system. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simulation 11, 1 (Jan.), 43-75.
8. LIU, B., FIGUEIREDO, D. R., Guo, Y., KUROSE, J. F., AND TOWSLEY, D. F. 2001. A study of networks simulation efficiency: Fluid simulation vs. packet-level simulation. In INFOCOM. 1244-1253.
9. LIU, B., GUO, Y., KUROSE, J., TOWSLEY, D., AND GONG, W. 1999. Fluid simulation of large scale networks: Issues and tradeoffs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Processing Techniques and Applications, vol. IV. 2136-2142.
10. LIU, Y., PRESTI, F. L., MISRA, V., TOWSLEY, D., AND GU, Y. 2003. Fluid models and solutions for large-scale IP networks. In Proceedings of the 2003 Sigmetrics Cosnference (San Diego, CA). 91-101.
11. MISRA, V., GONG, W., AND TOWSLEY, D. 1999. Stochastic differential equation modeling and analysis of TCP-windowsize behavior. In Proceedings of PERFORMANCE99 (Istanbul, Turkey).
12. NICOL, D., GOLDSBY, M., AND JOHNSON, M. 1999. Fluid-based simulation of communication networks using SSF. In Proceedings of the 1999 SCS European Simulation Conference (Erlanger-Nuremberg, Germany).
13. OTT, T., KEMPERMAN, J., AND MATHIS, M. 1996. The stationary behavior of ideal TCP congestion avoidance. Tech. rep., Bellcore. ftp://ftp.bellcore.com/pub/tjo/TCPwindow.ps.
14. BIDDER, A. 1996. Fast simulation of Markov fluid models. J. Appl. Prob. 33, 3, 786-804.
15. YAN, A. AND GONG, W. 1999. Time-driven fluid simulation for high speed networks. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theor., IT-45, 1588-1599.
16. YUNG, T., MARTIN, J., TAKAI, M., AND BAGRODIA, R. 2001. Integration of fluidbased analytical model with packet-level simulation for analysis of computer networks. In Proceedings of SPIE.