Comparison of and investigation into the size effects on the rotational dynamics of two spherical molecules: CCl 4 and C 60

Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Volumn 109, Issue 13, 2005, Pages 3009-3014

  Nichols, Kyle B ^a   Rodriguez, A A ^a  

^a EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL SHIFTS; RELAXATION RATES; ROTATIONAL DYNAMICS; SPIN-LATTICE RELAXATION;

ANISOTROPY; CARBON; CARBON TETRACHLORIDE; CORRELATION METHODS; DIFFUSION; HYDRODYNAMICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RELAXATION PROCESSES; ROTATION; SOLVENTS; VISCOSITY;

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

EID: 17044420462     PISSN: 10895639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp045899b     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Dutt, G. B.; Sachdeva, A. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 8307.
2. Ferris, T. D.; Farrar, T. Mol. Phys. 2002, 100, 303
3. Dutt, G. B.; Krishna, G. R. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112, 4676.
4. Ben-Amotz, D.; Drake, J. M. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 89, 1019.
5. Boere, R. T.; Kidd, R. G. Annu. Rep. NMR Spectrosc. 1982, 13, 319.
6. Jonas, J. J. Chem. Phys. 1968, 49, 4232.
7. Stokes, G. Trans. Cambridge Pilos. Soc. 9 1856, 5. Einstein, A. Investigations on the Theory of the Brownian Movement; Dover: New York, 1956. Deby, P. Polar Molecules; Dover: New York, 1929.
8. Stokes, G. Trans. Cambridge Pilos. Soc. 9 1856, 5. Einstein, A. Investigations on the Theory of the Brownian Movement; Dover: New York, 1956. Deby, P. Polar Molecules; Dover: New York, 1929.
9. Stokes, G. Trans. Cambridge Pilos. Soc. 9 1856, 5. Einstein, A. Investigations on the Theory of the Brownian Movement; Dover: New York, 1956. Deby, P. Polar Molecules; Dover: New York, 1929.
10. Ibuki, K.; Ueno, M. J. Mol. Liq. 1995, 65, 385.
11. Roy, M.; Doraiswamy, S. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 3213.
12. Youngren, G. K.; Acrivos, A. J. Chem. Phys. 1975, 63, 3846.
13. Harris, R. K.; Newman, R. H. Mol. Phys. 1979, 38, 1315.
14. Steinhauser, O.; Neumann, M. Mol. Phys. 1980, 40, 115.
15. Martin, N. H.; Issa, M. H.; McIntyre, R. A.; Rodriguez, A. A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104 (48), 11278.
16. Shang, X.; Issa, M. H.; Rodriguez, A. A. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 7731.
17. Shang, X.; Rodriguez, A. A. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 103.
18. Shang, X.; Fisher, L. A.; Rodriguez, A. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 4361.
19. The volume for this molecule was obtained via the increment method: Brinck, T.; Murray, J. S.; Politzer, P. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98 (5), 4305.
20. 60's volume was calculated using the radius of 3.521 Å as reported by Hedberg, K.; Hedberg, L.; Bethune, D. S. ; Brown, C. A.; Dorn, H. C.; Johnson, R. D.; De Vries, M. Science 1991, 254, 410.
21. Gillen, K. T.; Noggle, J. H.; Leipert, T. K. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1972, 17 (4), 505.
22. (a) Walton, J. H.; Kamasa-Quashie, A. K.; Joers, J. M.; Gullion, T. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1993, 203, 237.
23. (b) Johnson, R. D.; Yannoni, C. S.; Dorn, H. C.; Salem, J. R.; Bethune, D. S. Science 1992, 255, 1235.
24. Huntress, W. T. Advances in Magnetic Resonance; Academic Press: New York, 1970.
25. Abragam, A. The principles of nuclear magnetism; Clarendon: Oxford, 1961.
26. Kivelson, D.; Madden, P. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1980, 31, 523.
27. Alms, G. R.; Bauer, D. R.; Brauman, J. I.; Pecora, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1973, 59, 5310.
28. Dote, J. L.; Kivelson, D.; Schwartz, R. N. J. Phys. Chem. 1981, 85, 2169.
29. Hildebrand, J. H. Science, 1971, 174, 490.
30. Batschinski, A. J. Z. Phys. Chem. 1913, 84, 643.
31. Hynes, J. T.; Kapral, R.; Weinberg, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1978, 69 (6), 2725.
32. Hynes, J. T.; Kapral, R.; Weinberg, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1977, 67 (7), 3256.
33. Subramanian, G.; Davis, H. T. Phys. Rev. 1975, A11, 1430.
34. O'Dell, J.; Berne, B. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1975, 63, 2376.
35. Chandler, D. J. Chem. Phys. 1974, 60, 3508.
36. Hynes, J. T.; Kapral, R.; Weinberg, M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1977, 46, 463.
37. Tanabe, K. Chem. Phys. 1979, 38, 125.
38. Gierer, A.; Wirtz, K. Z. Naturforsch. 1953, A8, 532.
39. 2 + 1). Bottcher, C. S. E. Theory of Electric Polarization; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1973.
40. The volume for this molecule was obtained via the increment method; Hanai, T.; Hatano, H. Analyst 1994, 119, 1167.
41. 60 were obtained indirectly and so must be treated as estimates.
42. Gordon, R. G. Phys. Rev. 1966, 44, 1830.
43. Frankel, J. Kinetic Theory of Liquids; Dover: New York, 1955.
44. Boyd, P. D. W.; Hodgson, M. C.; Rickard, C. E. F.; Oliver, A. G.; Chaker, L. Brothers, P. J.; Bolskar, R. D.; Tham, S. F.; Reed, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10487.