Nucleon magnetic moments beyond the perturbative chiral regime

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 1999, Pages

  Leinweber, Derek B ^a   Lu, Ding H ^a   Thomas, Anthony W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17044419985     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.034014     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Lattice ’98, Proceedings of the International Symposium, Boulder, Colorado, 1998, edited by T. DeGrand, C. DeTar, R. Sugar, and D. Toussaint, [Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.), (in press)].
2. D. B. Leinweber and T. D. Cohen, Phys. Rev. D 47, 2147 (1993)
3. A. W. Thomas, Aust. J. Phys. 44, 173 (1991).
4. M. F. L. Golterman, Acta Phys. Pol. B 25, 1731 (1994).
5. J. N. Labrenz and S. R. Sharpe, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 34, 335 (1994).
6. C. Bernard and M. Golterman, Phys. Rev. D 46, 853 (1992).
7. S. R. Sharpe, Phys. Rev. D 46, 3146 (1992).
8. B. Holstein, in Future Directions in Quark Nuclear Physics, CSSM, Adelaide, SA, 1998, edited by K. Tsushima and A. W. Thomas (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998), nucl-th/9806037.
9. P. Langacker and H. Pagels, Phys. Rev. D 8, 4595 (1973).
10. S. Weinberg, Physica A 96, 327 (1979).
11. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 158, 142 (1984).
12. J. Gasser, M. E. Sainio, and A. Suarc, Nucl. Phys. B307, 779 (1988).
13. M. Butler, D. B. Leinweber, and R. Springer (unpublished).
14. E. Jenkins, M. Luke, A. V. Manohar, and M. J. Savage, Phys. Lett. B 302, 482 (1993)
15. Phys. Lett. BE. JenkinsM. LukeA. V. ManoharM. J. Savage388, 866(E) (1996).
16. L. Durand and P. Ha, Phys. Rev. D 58, 013010 (1998).
17. D. B. Leinweber, R. M. Woloshyn, and T. Draper, Phys. Rev. D 43, 1659 (1991).
18. W. Wilcox, T. Draper, and K. F. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 46, 1109 (1992).
19. S. J. Dong, K. F. Liu, and A. G. Williams, Phys. Rev. D 58, 074504 (1998).
20. S. Théberge, A. W. Thomas, and G. A. Miller, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2838 (1980)
21. Phys. Rev. DS. ThébergeA. W. ThomasG. A. Miller23, 2106(E) (1981).
22. A. W. Thomas, in Advances in Nuclear Physics, edited by J. Negle and E. Vogt (Plenum, New York, 1984), Vol. 13, p. 1
23. G. A. Miller, Int. Rev. Nucl. Phys. 2, 90 (1984).
24. Magnetic moment contributions from the coupling of the electromagnetic current directly to sea-quark loops are neglected in these simulations. However, the net effect from u, d, and s sea-quark loops is small due to approximate SU(3)-flavor symmetry where the net loop contribution vanishes.
25. S. Cabasino, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 20, 399 (1991).
26. B. Efron, SIAM (Soc. Ind. Appl. Math.) Rev. 21, 460 (1979).
27. A. Chodos, Phys. Rev. D 9, 3471 (1974)
28. Phys. Rev. DA. Chodos, 10, 2599 (1974)
29. Phys. Rev. DT. A. DeGrand, 12, 2060 (1975).
30. D. H. Lu, A. W. Thomas, and A. G. Williams, Phys. Rev. C 57, 2628 (1998).
31. S. Théberge and A. W. Thomas, Nucl. Phys. A393, 252 (1983).
32. S. Aoki, in Lattice ’97, Proceedings of XVth International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, Edinburgh, UK, 1997, edited by C. T. H. Davies et al. [Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 60A, 14 (1998)].
33. T. D. Cohen and D. B. Leinweber, Comments Nucl. Part. Phys. 21, 137 (1993).
34. This dependence on (Formula presented) will eventually be alleviated as better lattice data become available at smaller quark masses, allowing a three parameter fit of Eq. (4).