New considerations in the prevention of aversives, restraint, and seclusion: Incorporating the role of relationships into an ecological perspective

Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 263-272

  Amos, Patricia A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Aversives; Human development; Positive behavior support; Relationships; Restraint; Seclusion

Indexed keywords

EID: 17044404269     PISSN: 15407969     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2511/rpsd.29.4.263     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law. (2003). Suspending disbelief: Moving beyond punishment to promote effective interventions for children with mental or emotional disorders. Washington, D.C.
2. Bloom, S. L. (2002). Creating sanctuary. In Violence and coercion in mental health settings: Eliminating the use of seclusion and restraint, a special edition of NTAC networks, Summer-Fall. Alexandria, VA: National Technical Assistance Center for State Mental Health Planning.
3. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Carr, E. G., Dunlap, G., Horner, R., Koegel, R., Turnbull, A., Sailor, W., et al. (2002). Positive behavior support: evolution of an applied science. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4, 4-16, 20.
5. Center for Outreach and Services for the Autism Community. (2003). Restrictive procedures within behavior support plans and essential elements of comprehensive behavior support plans that include restrictive procedures. Online: http:// www.njcosac.org/Essential-Rest%20Proc%20Statement
6. Children's Health Act. (P.L. 106-310), Parts H & I. (2000).
7. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.
8. Donnellan, A. M., LaVigna, G. W., Negri-Shoultz, N., & Fass-bender, L. (1988). Progress without punishment: Effective approaches for learners with behavior problems. New York: Teachers College Press.
9. Durand, V. M. (1990). The aversives debate is over: and now the work begins. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15, 140-141.
10. Fogel, A. (1993). Developing through relationships: Origins of communication, self, and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Greenspan, S. I., & Wieder, S. (1997a). An integrated developmental approach to interventions for young children with difficulties in relating and communicating. In: Assessing and Treating Infants and Young Children with Severe Difficulties in Relating and Communicating, A Bulletin of Zero to Three: National Center for Infants, Toddlers, and Families, 17(5), 5-17.
12. Greenspan, S. I., & Wieder, S. (1997b). Developmental patterns and outcomes in infants and children with disorders in relating and communicating: a chart review of 200 cases of children with autistic spectrum diagnoses. The Journal of Developmental and Learning Disorders, 1, 87-141.
13. Gross, G. (2003). Restraint and seclusion: Overview of federal laws and policies. National Association of Protection and Advocacy Systems. Online: http://www.napas.org/ AbuseNeglect/Restraintoutline03.htm
14. Hardenstine, B. (2001). Leading the way toward a seclusion and restraint-free environment. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: Department of Public Welfare.
15. Harris, S. L., Handleman, J. S., Gill, M. J., & Fong, P. L. (1991). Does punishment hurt? The impact of aversives on the clinician. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 12, 17-24.
16. Herman, J. L. (1992). Trauma and recovery. New York: Basic Books.
17. Hurley-Geffner, C. M. (1995). Friendships between children with and without developmental disabilities. In R. L. Koegel & L. K. Koegel (eds.), Teaching children with autism: Positive strategies for initiating positive interactions and improving learning opportunities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
18. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. 20 U.S.C. sections 1400 et seq. (1999).
19. Interdisciplinary Council on Developmental and Learning Disorders. (2000). Clinical practice guidelines: Overview and recommendations. Bethesda, MD: Author.
20. Kennedy, S. S., & Mohr, W. K. (2001). A prolegomena on restraint of children: implicating constitutional rights. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 71(1), 26-37.
21. Kipnis, D. (1987). Psychology and behavioral technology. American Psychologist, 42(1), 30-36.
22. Kuhn, T. S. (1962), The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Lovett, H. (1996). Learning to listen: Positive approaches and people with difficult behavior. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
24. Maslow, A. (1970). Motivation and personality (2d ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
25. Michaels, C., Brown, F., & Mirabella, N. Personal paradigm shifts in PBS experts: Perceptions of treatment acceptability of consequence-based behavioral procedures. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions. (In Press).
26. Mohr, W. K., Petti, T. A., & Mohr, B. D. (2003). Adverse effects associated with physical restraint. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 48, 330-337.
27. Mulick, J. A. (1994). Should only positive methods be used by professionals who work with children and youth? No. In M. A. Mason & E. Gambrill (eds.), Debating children's lives: Current controversies on children and adolescents (pp. 228-236). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors. (1999). Reducing the use of seclusion and restraint: Findings, strategies and recommendations. Alexandria, VA.
29. National Council on Disability. (2002). The well being of our nation: An inter-generational vision of effective mental health services and supports. Online: http://www.ncd.gov/ newsroom/publications/2002/mentalhealth.htm
30. National Mental Health Association. (2004). Treatment works for youth in the juvenile justice system. Online: http:// www.nmha.org/children/justjuv/ treatment.cfm
31. National Technical Assistance Center for State Mental Health Planning. (2002). Eliminating the use of seclusion and restraint: Special edition of NTAC networks. Alexandria, VA.
32. O'Brien, J. (1991). Against pain as a tool in professional work on people with severe disabilities. Disability, Handicap and Society, 6, 81-90.
33. Perry, B. D. (1997). Incubated in terror: Neurodevelopmental factors in the "cycle of violence." In J. Osofsky (ed.), Children in a violent society (pp. 124-149). New York: Guilford Press.
34. Perry, B. D., Pollard, R. A., Blakley, T. L., Baker, W. L., & Vigilante, D. (1995). Childhood trauma, the neurobiology of adaptation and use-dependent development of the brain: how states become traits. Infant Mental Health Journal, 16, 271-289.
35. Pflueger, W. (2002). Consumer view: Restraint is not therapeutic. In Violence and coercion in mental health settings: Eliminating the use of seclusion and restraint, a special edition of NTAC networks (Summer-Fall). Alexandria, VA: National Technical Assistance Center for State Mental Health Planning.
36. Prescott, L. (1998). Veterans of abuse and daughters of the dark: The politics of naming and risk of transformation in building partnerships for change. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 34, 95-100.
37. Salinski, A. (2004, Nov.). Family responses to children's experiences of aversives, restraint, and seclusion: A longitudinal study. Paper presented at the annual TASH Conference, Reno, Nevada.
38. Scotti, J. R., Evans, I. M., Meyer, I. H., & Walker, P. (1991). A meta-analysis of intervention research with problem behavior: Treatment validity and standard of practice. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 96, 233-256.
39. Singer, G. H. S., Gert, B., & Koegel, R. (1999). A moral framework for analyzing the controversy over aversive behavioral interventions for people with severe mental retardation. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 1, 88-100.
40. Staub, D., Peck, C. A., Gallucci, C., & Schwartz, I. (2000). Peer relationships. In M. E. Snell & F. Brown (eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (5th ed., pp. 381-408). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
41. Steel, E. (1999). Seclusion and restraint practice standards: A review and analysis. National Mental Health Association Consumer Supporter Technical Assistance Center.
42. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2003a). Seclusion and restraint: Breaking the bonds. SAMHSA News, XI.
43. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2003b). SAMHSA national call to action: Eliminating the use of seclusion and restraint.
44. Tsakiris, E. (2000). Evaluating effective interventions for children with autism and related disorders: Widening the view and changing the perspective. In The Interdisciplinary Council on Developmental and Learning Disorders Clinical Practice Guidelines: Redefining the Standards of Care for Infants, Children, and Families with Special Needs (pp. 725-817). Bethesda, MD: ICDL Press.
45. Turnbull, H. R., Wilcox, B. L., Stowe, M., Raper, C., & Hedges, L. P. (2000). Public policy foundations for positive behavioral interventions, strategies, and supports. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 2, 218-230.
46. Turnbull, H. R., Wilcox, B. L., Turnbull, A. P., Sailor, W., & Wickham, D. (2001). The IDEA, positive behavioral supports, and school safety. Journal of Law and Education, 30.
47. U.S. General Accounting Office. (1999). Improper restraint or seclusion use places people at risk. (GAO publication HEH-99-176). Washington, D.C.: USGAO.
48. Vygotsky, L. A. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49. Weiss, E. M. (1998). Deadly restraint: A nationwide pattern of death. Hartford Courant, October 11-15.
50. Weiss, N. R. (1993; updated 2000). Toward the elimination of the use of aversive procedures to control individuals with disabilities: A call to action from TASH. Baltimore, MD: TASH.