Effectiveness of using cross-sections in the recognition of anatomical structures in radiological images

Anatomical Record - Part B New Anatomist

Volumn 283, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 9-13

  Khalil, Mohammed K ^a   Payer, Andrew F ^b,c   Johnson, Tristan E ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c AAA Educational Affairs Committee

Author keywords

Anatomy; Computed tomography; Computer based instruction; Cross section; Magnetic resonance imaging; Radiological images

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS; ANATOMY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MEDICAL STUDENT; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; REVIEW; VOLUNTEER;

ADULT; ANATOMY, CROSS-SECTIONAL; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION, GRADUATE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RADIOLOGY; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 17044399289     PISSN: 0003276X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ar.b.20053     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Barros N, Rodrigues CJ, Rodrigues AJ Jr, Negri Germano MA, Cerri GG. 2001. The value of teaching sectional anatomy to improve CT scan interpretation. Clin Anat 14:36-41.
2. Bruner JS. 1966. Toward a theory of instruction. New York: Norton.
3. Canade A, Palladino F, Pitzalis G, Campioni P, Marano P. 2003. Web-based radiology: a future to be created. Rays 28:109-117.
4. Dienes Z. 1969. Building up mathematics. London: Hutchinson Educational Press.
5. Durfee SM, Jain S, Shaffer K. 2003. Incorporating electronic media into medical student education: a survey of AMSER members on computers and web use in radiology courses. Acad Radiol 10:205-210.
6. Erkonen WE, Albanese MA, Smith WL, Pantazis NJ. 1990. Perspectives in radiologic education: gross anatomy instruction with diagnostic images. Invest Radiol 25:292-294.
7. Erkonen WE, Albanese MA, Smith WL, Pantazis NJ. 1992. Perspectives in radiologic education: effectiveness of teaching radiologic image interpretation in gross anatomy - a long-term follow-up. Invest Radiol 27:264-266.
8. Hiebert J, Behr M. 1988. Introduction: capturing the major themes. In: Hiebert J, Behr M, editors. Research agenda for mathematics education: number concepts and operations in the middle grades. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. p 1-18.
9. Johnson TE, Lesh R. 2003. Models and modeling perspective on technology-based representational media. In: Lesh R, Dorr H, editors. A models and modeling perspective on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. p 265-278.
10. Parker JA, Wallis JW, Halama JR, Brown CV, Cradduck TD, Graham MM, Wu E, Wagenaar DJ, Mammone GL, Greenes RA, Holman BL. 1996. Collaboration using internet for the development of case-based teaching files: report of the computer and instrumentation council internet focus group. J Nucl Med 37:178-184.
11. Shapiro LB, Watt-Smith SR, Milosevic AM, Walters ID, Young P, Anderson RH. 1998. Cross-sectional imaging of a cadaveric human heart. Clin Anat 11:75-80.
12. Sparacia G, Tartamella M, Finazzo M, Bartolotta T, Banco A, Lo Casto A, La Tona G, Bentivenga E. 1997. Server world-wide web on the internet for the provision of clinical cases and digital radiolgic images for training and continuing education in radiology. Radiol Med 93:743-750.
13. Sparacia G, Bartolotta TV, Brancatelli G, Carmella D, Vimercati F. 1999. Design and implementation of a World Wide Web teaching files database on diagnostic radiology. Radiol Med 97:76-80.