Commuters and the regional assignment of innovative activities: A methodological patent study of German districts

Research Policy

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 221-234

  Deyle, Hanno G ^a   Grupp, Hariolf ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Commuters; Patent statistics; Regional innovation

Indexed keywords

GEOGRAPHICAL REGIONS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; STATISTICAL METHODS;

COMMUTERS; HYPOTHESIS; PATENT STATISTICS; REGIONAL INNOVATION;

REGIONAL PLANNING;

EID: 17044371579     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. K. Blind, and H. Grupp Interdependencies between the science and technology infrastructure and innovation activities in German regions: empirical findings and policy consequences Research Policy 28 1999 451 468
2. Cohen, W., 1995. Empirical studies of innovative activity. In: Stoneman, P. (Ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Oxford and Cambridge, pp. 182-264.
3. R. Coombs, P. Saviotti, and V. Walsh Economics and Technological Change 1987 Houndsmill
4. Dosi, G., 1988. The nature of the innovative process. In: Dosi, G., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., Freeman, C., Soete, L. (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory. London, pp. 221-238.
5. Feldman, M.P., 1994. The Geography of Innovation. Dordrecht.
6. Freeman, C., Soete, L., 1997. The Economics of Industrial Innovation, third ed. London.
7. G.M. Grossman, and E. Helpman Endogenous product cycles The Economic Journal 101 1991 1214 1229
8. Grupp, H., 1998. Foundations of the Economics of Innovation. Cheltenham.
9. E. von Hippel 'Sticky information' and the locus of problem solving: implications for innovation Management Science 40 1994 429 439
10. Koesel, M.A., Heydebreck, P., 1994. Technologiekooperationen und -verflechtungen Kleiner und Mittlerer Unternehmen im Grenzüberschreitenden Bodenseeraum. In: Muller, E., Gundrum, U., Koschatzky, K. (Eds.), Horizontal Review of Regional Innovation Capabilities. Karlsruhe.
11. Koschatzky, K, 2000. Regionale Verteilung von Innovations- und Technologiepotentialen in Deutschland und Europa. Karlsruhe.
12. P.R. Krugman Increasing returns, monopolistic competition and international trade Journal of International Economics 9 1979 469 479
13. Krugman, P., 1991. Geography and Trade. Cambridge.
14. R.E. Lucas On the mechanics of economic development Journal of Monetary Economics 22 1988 3 42
15. Mansfield, E.J., 1984. Comments on using linked patent and R&D data to measure interindustry technology flows. In: Griliches, Z. (Ed.), R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Chicago, pp. 461-464.
16. Pyka, A., Knueppers, G., 2002. Innovation Networks - Theory and Practice. Cheltenham.
17. Reger, G., 1994. Grenzüberschreitende Kooperationen in der Euregio - Empirische Analyse technologieorientierter Außenbeziehungen von Betrieben in der Euregio Maas-Rhein. In: Muller, E., Gundrum, U., Koschatzky, K. (Eds.), Horizontal Review of Regional Innovation Capabilities. Karlsruhe.
18. P.M. Romer Endogenous technological change Journal of Political Economy 98 5 1990 S71 S102
19. Rothwell, R., Zegveld, W., 1982. Innovation and the Small and Medium Sized Firm - Their Role in Employment and in Economic Change. London.
20. Schmookler, J., 1966. Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge.