Brane-world creation and black holes

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 1-8

  Garriga, Jaume ^a   Sasaki, Misao ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17044371547     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.043523     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. See, e.g., J. Polchinski, String Theory I & II (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1998).
2. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 429, 263 (1998); Phys. Rev. D 59, 086004 (1999); I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 436, 257 (1998); A. Pomarol, hep-ph/9911294.
3. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 429, 263 (1998); Phys. Rev. D 59, 086004 (1999); I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 436, 257 (1998); A. Pomarol, hep-ph/9911294.
4. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 429, 263 (1998); Phys. Rev. D 59, 086004 (1999); I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 436, 257 (1998); A. Pomarol, hep-ph/9911294.
5. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3370 (1999).
6. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4690 (1999).
7. T. Shiromizu, K. Maeda and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D 62, 024012 (2000).
8. J. Garriga and T. Tanaka, hep-th/9911055.
9. C. Csaki, M. Graesser, L. Randall and J. Terning, Phys. Rev. D 62, 045015 (2000); W. Goldberger and M. Wise, hep-th/9911457.
10. A. Chamblin, S.W. Hawking and H.S. Reall, Phys. Rev. D 61, 065007 (2000).
11. R. Emparan, G.T. Horowitz and R.C. Myers, J. High Energy Phys. 01, 007 (2000).
12. N. Kaloper, Phys. Rev. D 60, 123506 (1999).
13. P. Binétruy, C. Deffayet, U. Ellwanger and D. Langlois, hep-th/9910219; E.E. Flanagan, S.-H.H. Tye and I. Wasserman, hep-ph/9910498.
14. We were informed by T. Shiromizu that the Lorentzian version of a family of spherically symmetric brane solutions has been recently discussed by Kraus [25] (see also [26]).
15. H. Kodama and M. Sasaki, Suppl. Prog. Theor. Phys. 78, 1 (1984).
16. J.B. Hartle and S.W. Hawking, Phys. Rev. D 28, 2960 (1983).
17. A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 30, 509 (1984); 33, 3560 (1986).
18. A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 30, 509 (1984); 33, 3560 (1986).
19. J. Garriga and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 56, 2464 (1997).
20. A. Chamblin and G.W. Gibbons, hep-th/9909130.
21. M. Sasaki, T. Shiromizu and K. Maeda, Phys. Rev. D 62, 024008 (2000).
22. R. Gregory and R. Laflamme, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2837 (1993).
23. P. Ginsparg and M.J. Perry, Nucl. Phys. B222, 245 (1983).
24. R. Caldwell, A. Chamblin and G. Gibbons, Phys. Rev. D 53, 7103 (1996); R.B. Mann, Nucl. Phys. B516, 357 (1998); A. Chamblin and J.A.M. Ashbourn-Chamblin, Phys. Rev. D 57, 3529 (1998).
25. R. Caldwell, A. Chamblin and G. Gibbons, Phys. Rev. D 53, 7103 (1996); R.B. Mann, Nucl. Phys. B516, 357 (1998); A. Chamblin and J.A.M. Ashbourn-Chamblin, Phys. Rev. D 57, 3529 (1998).
26. R. Caldwell, A. Chamblin and G. Gibbons, Phys. Rev. D 53, 7103 (1996); R.B. Mann, Nucl. Phys. B516, 357 (1998); A. Chamblin and J.A.M. Ashbourn-Chamblin, Phys. Rev. D 57, 3529 (1998).
27. The use of compact Euclidean solutions in order to describe nucleation processes in a preexisting background is the subject of some debate (see e.g. [23,24] for a recent discussion). The problem is that the instanton itself does not represent a semiclassical path interpolating between the original configuration and the configuration after tunneling (incidentally, this is true even for the well-known Coleman-de Lucchia instanton describing false vacuum decay in the presence of gravity). Here, we shall not delve into this problem, adopting the interpretation given in the original references. Our emphasis will be in the case corresponding to creation from nothing, where the interpretation of instantons as semiclassical paths is perhaps less controversial.
28. R. Bousso and A. Chamblin, Phys. Rev. D 59, 084004 (1999).
29. U. Gen and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D 61, 103508 (2000).
30. P. Kraus, J. High Energy Phys. 12, 011 (1999).
31. M. Cvetic, S. Griffies and H.H. Soleng, Phys. Rev. D 48, 2613 (1993); M. Cvetic and H.H. Soleng, Phys. Rep. 282, 159 (1997); A. Chamblin and H. Reall, Nucl. Phys. B562, 133 (1999); D. Ida, gr-qc/9912002.
32. M. Cvetic, S. Griffies and H.H. Soleng, Phys. Rev. D 48, 2613 (1993); M. Cvetic and H.H. Soleng, Phys. Rep. 282, 159 (1997); A. Chamblin and H. Reall, Nucl. Phys. B562, 133 (1999); D. Ida, gr-qc/9912002.
33. M. Cvetic, S. Griffies and H.H. Soleng, Phys. Rev. D 48, 2613 (1993); M. Cvetic and H.H. Soleng, Phys. Rep. 282, 159 (1997); A. Chamblin and H. Reall, Nucl. Phys. B562, 133 (1999); D. Ida, gr-qc/9912002.
34. See e.g. S.S. Gubser, hep-th/9912001, and references therein.
35. S.W. Hawking and N. Turok, Phys. Lett. B 425, 25 (1998); 432, 271 (1998).
36. S.W. Hawking and N. Turok, Phys. Lett. B 425, 25 (1998); 432, 271 (1998).